Biologists Rate the Rain Forests
9/24/97
*******************************
RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:
Headline: Biologists Rate the Rain Forests
Source: The Christian Science Monitor
Date: 9/24/97
Author: Clara Germani, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
To determine conservation priorities, a scientific team sizes up unexplored
tropical areas
MORE than just bumper-sticker chic, the ``save the rain forest'' slogan
represents a single overarching concern shared by the world's diverse
environmental movement.
But the save-the-rain-forest consensus raises the urgent scientific
question of which rain forests to save.
In a SWAT team-style approach to that scientific dilemma, Conservation
International has started a Rapid Assessment Program (RAP) to survey
unexplored tropical rain-forest areas believed to have the greatest
diversity of living species and rank them as world conservation priorities.
The Washington environmental group's pilot expedition this summer dropped
four world-renowned field biologists into the uninhabited Alto Madidi of
Bolivia, where the Andes mountains meet the Amazonian jungle.
The RAP team was given about a month to catalog as many species as it
could. Under the rigor of traditional science, this kind of research can
take up to 30 or 40 years, involving the collection of species samples
through several changes of season and the independent verification of those
samples by other scientists throughout the world.
The draft report of the RAP team's first expedition now being circulated
among environmental groups is notable not just for the pioneering of a new
``conservation science,'' but also because the Alto Madidi rivaled the most
biodiverse areas known to science. For example, the list of bird species
identified there is longer than for any other place in the world.
``RAP is cutting-edge biology that will set the conservation agenda for the
next century,'' says Russell A. Mittermeier, president of Conservation
International. ``We know more about the surface of Mars than about these
forests, the most diverse ecosystems on Earth. Now we will be able to show
where the plant and animal species are concentrated while there is still
time to protect them.''
The struggle to prioritize rain-forest conservation is not new.
``Hotspots,'' ``environmentally sensitive areas,'' ``environmental
imperatives,'' and similar designations are given to rain-forest areas by
environmental organizations on the basis of accumulated data.
But such specific research as the Rapid Assessment Program is new, says Bob
Jenkins, vice president and director of science for the Nature Conservancy.
(Conservation International is a breakaway group from the Nature
Conservancy.)
``The driving impulse behind their approach is the emergency of getting the
most done in the shortest period of time, because the whole world of
biodiversity is evaporating,'' Mr. Jenkins says.
Logging or slash-and-burn clearing for farming destroys tropical jungles
from Madagascar to Brazil at an estimated pace of 42 million acres a year,
according to environmental specialists. These rain forests are believed to
harbor two-thirds of all plant and animal species, most of which are still
unidentified by scientists.
``... there is a surprising lack of knowledge about what exists and where.
If an inventory isn't done now, we'll end up missing [what there is to
save],'' says Walt Reid, associate in program and forests and biodiversity
for the World Resources Institute, a Washington-based environmental
organization.
The World Bank's tropical ecologist, Robert Goodland, says he anticipates
RAP data to be ``of great interest, importance, and utility'' to
development groups and lending institutions.
He says not enough World Bank money goes to environmental studies. So RAP
surveys - even though narrowly focused on animal and plant species - could
certainly be important ``when we want to know if a road goes from point A
to point B, does it cut through an area of special significance?''
The RAP team's Bolivian expedition this summer was the first of six
sponsored by a $750,000 grant from the John D. and Catherine T. McArthur
Foundation.
Because the accelerated research of the RAP team could be criticized for
not being ``real'' science, the use of top field biologists whose expertise
could not be quarreled with is key to the program, says Murray Gell-Mann,
the Nobel Prize-winning physicist who helped develop the RAP concept as
chairman of the McArthur Foundation's world environment and resources
committee.
The RAP team was led by Theodore A. Parker III, a Louisiana State
University ornithologist who can identify close to 3,000 species of birds
by their song.
As tropical rain forests go, the Alto Madidi region was expected to be a
``pale'' finger of the Amazon basin and not as biologically diverse as
those in Peru or Brazil, say Alwyn H. Gentry, curator at the Missouri
Botanical Gardens and a RAP team botanist. But, he says, the biologists
were astonished at what they found: the longest recorded list of bird
species in the world; unusually large numbers of tapirs and spider monkeys
for Latin America; the first scientific sighting in the wild of a rare
short-eared dog; numerous sightings of plants, mammals, and birds never
before seen in Bolivia.
``What struck me most wasn't plants but tapirs ... to actually see them in
broad daylight is rare,'' Dr. Gentry says.
While the Conservation International project is narrowly focused, not
taking into account political or social factors that would affect the
ultimate question of whether to protect an area studied by RAP teams, it is
a concept welcomed by the environmental community.
So it was ironic that the specter of controversy was raised in campfire
musings of the RAP team members themselves.
Considering the riches of the Alto Madidi, Gentry says ``the four
biologists were wondering in fact what would happen to internal politics
[of Conservation International as well as the environmental movement in
general] if we spoke strongly and said this is better probably than the
Beni.''
The Beni Biosphere Reserve is a Bolivian park created by Conservation
International and the Bolivian government in the first debt-for-nature swap
and has been a major focus of publicity and fund-raising.
``A lot of international conservation sites have been chosen
opportunistically and not for biological reasons,'' explains Brent Bailey,
Conservation International coordinator of biological programs. Often the
difficulties of setting up a protected tract of land - from buying it to
politically assuring its protection - mean that conservation groups cannot
be choosey. But RAPs, he says, can be models for how to find more valuable
areas to protect. New finds like the Alto Madidi should not diminish the
importance of conserving other areas too, he says.