*********************************************** 

WORLDWIDE FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS 

Amazonians File Complaint Against Bank 

*********************************************** 

Forest Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises 

June 23, 1995 

 

OVERVIEW & SOURCE 

Brazilian forest peoples and activists have lodged a complaint  

against the World Bank; alleging the PLANOFLORO project, intended  

to to set up "extractive" reserves, has been largely ineffectual.   

This bank project was largely meant to make amends for past  

development failures, such as Rondonia highway building, which  

were financed by the bank and caused much environmental  

deterioration.  This item was posted by IPS in econet's  

rainfor.general.  Note this item is a draft article. 

 

******************************* 

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE: 

 

/** rainfor.genera: 159.0 **/ 

** Topic: amazonians file complaint against bank ** 

** Written  4:18 PM  Jun 15, 1995 by pchatterjee in  

cdp:rainfor.genera ** 

From: Pratap Chatterjee <pchatterjee> 

Subject: amazonians file complaint against bank 

 

please note this is a pre-edited version 

 

ENVIRONMENT: Brazilian forest people lodge complaint against World 

Bank 

 

   By Pratap Chatterjee 

 

WASHINGTON, Jun 15 (IPS) - A 300 page package from forest  

communities in the Brazilian Amazon was expected to arrive 

Thursday at the World Bank's offices asking for a formal  

investigation into the Bank's failure to set up protected reserves 

for local communties. 

 

The complaint to the Bank's newly created inspection panel, the 

third compliant filed since it was set up last August, concerns 

the three-year old 167 million dollar Rondonia Agricultural, 

Livestock and Forestry (PLANOFLORO) project. 

 

The object of PLANOFLORO is to set up "extractive" reserves 

to help local people harvest native products such as rubber, 

Brazil nuts and about 30 other products. 

 

Twenty five groups representing small farmers, rubber tappers, 

unions, environmental and indigenous peoples groups in 

Rondonia, western Brazil, say that the project "has been 

hindered by a series of impediments, largely caused by 

omissions of the World Bank ... failures in enforcing 

contractual obligations and implementing its own policies and 

directives." 

 

PLANOFLORO was set up with much fanfare at the time of the 

Earth Summit in Rio de Janiero, Brazil, in June 1992, to clean 

up the mess created by a previous multi-million dollar Bank 

development project. 

 

In 1981 the Bank lent Brazil 445 million dollars for the 

Northwest Brazil Integrated Development Programme (POLONORESTE) 

to pave 1500 kilometres of dirt tracks in the remote region of 

Rondonia which borders Bolivia. 

 

The newly modernised road allowed nearly half a million 

migrants to invade the forests and clear them for cultivation. 

By 1991 the destruction of Rondonia's forests had multiplied to 

ten times its original rate. The burning of the forest became a 

major focus of research as the single largest, most rapid human 

caused change on earth visible from space. 

 

Diseases spread rapidly. Malaria infection rates soared to 100 

percent in some killed indigenous communities with over 

250,000 people infected. Infant mortality rates reached 50 

percent in some communities. 

 

In 1987 Barber Conable, the president of the Bank, said that 

POLONORESTE was a "sobering example of an environmentally 

sound project gone wrong." The PLANOFLORO project was designed 

to try and reverse some of these problems. 

 

But PLANOFLORO has not worked so far. Activists say the 

National Institute for Colonisation and Agrarian Reform (INCRA) 

has allegedly refused to sign land titles for local people and 

has even brought in thousands of people to settle in lands that 

were supposed to be off-limits for development. 

 

The complaint to the panel is the latest in a series from local 

groups to make the project work. Last May activists attempted 

to draw attention to the lack of government cooperation by 

faxing a message to the Bank when it convened a special meeting 

of activists and industry groups in this city last May to 

review new Bank forestry projects. 

 

"No strategy has yet been defined for regulating land titles 

and land use concessions. The first zoning map did not benefit  

from field studies and consultations with the local population  

involved in extractive activities," read the faxed message from  

Luiz Rodrigues de Oliveira, the executive secretary of the non 

governmental forum of Rondonia. 

 

Instead, the result of the mistaken policies of other agencies 

in the area financed by the Bank, has been "the continual 

invasion of areas ocupied by rubber tappers, facilitated by 

government agencies themselves," it added. 

 

Since then the groups have sifted through 14,000 pages of  

documents to draft the new formal complaint. They have 

uncovered confidential internal Bank documents that discuss how 

"to avoid embarassment" to the Bank while allowing the former 

Rondonia state governor "to obtain political return before the 

elections." 

 

Roberto Esmeraldi, from the Friends of the Earth Amazon 

programme, told IPS from Sao Paulo in eastern Brazil, that he 

had forwarded the complaint which he received from Rondonia on 

Wednesday to Washington by Federal Express courier. 

 

Dispatching the complaint has caused commotion in Brazil as 

well as here in Washington. Emerson Teixeira, Rondonia's new 

planning secretary told newspapers that INCRA would sign an 

agreement in the next two weeks, blaming state bureaucracy in 

the previous government for the delays. 

 

"For example loans to small farmers are stuck in the state 

bank. Project resources have been spent on bureaucracy and the 

civil service, in areas like salaries and consultancies," he 

said. 

 

Rondonian activists in Brazil told IPS that ever since they had 

made news of the complaint public "many organisations have 

been inundated with calls day and night from the Bank and 

consultants telling us to withdraw the complaint." 

 

Mark Wilson, the Bank's division chief for natural resources 

management and rural poverty operations in Brazil, told IPS 

that he was "disappointed" that the activists had not 

discussed their plans to submit a complaint with him or his 

staff. 

 

"This project has the highest supervision component of any 

project in the Latin America division of the Bank. We have an 

office in Mato Grosso, we have sent five missions to the 

field," he said. 

 

"Local group representatives make up 50 percent of all the 

technical committees we have for the project. We rely heavily 

on the NGOs to bring us evidence of land invasions. It is a 

difficult process that involves cajoling the government and we 

have been on record of challenging the government ourselves," 

he added. 

 

This weekend a team of Bank officials from Wilson's office will 

fly down to Brazil to meet with the activists and undertake 

another supervision mission. Meanwhile the activists are 

planning to come to Washington on Jun 28 or 29 to meet with the 

inspection panel. 

 

The Brazilian complaint is the third to be submitted to the 

independent three member panel that was set up last August by 

the Bank to investigate complaints made by people affected by 

Bank projects. 

 

The first complaint to the panel was made last October by 

Nepali groups who charged that Bank plans to lend money for a 

dam planned for the remote Arun Valley in Nepal had violated 

Bank policies on environmental assessment. A second complaint 

was filed earlier this year by an ethnic Greek business family 

that lost its lands in Ethiopia because of a Bank project. 

 

The Bank's board of directors approved a partial investigation 

into the first complaint which is expected to be wrapped up in 

the next week or so. The panel has also almost finished 

preparing a report on the second complaint which will not 

recommend an investigation. (ENDS/IPS/PC/95) 

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS###

You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal 

campaign use; including writing letters, organizing campaigns and 

forwarding.  All efforts are made to provide accurate, timely 

pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all 

information rests with the reader.  Check out our Gaia Forest 

Conservation Archives at URL=   

http://forests.lic.wisc.edu/forests/gaia.html

 

Networked by:

Ecological Enterprises

Email (best way to contact)-> gbarry@forests.org 

Phone->(608) 233-2194  ||  Fax->(608) 231-2312