***********************************************  

WORLDWIDE BIODIVERSITY/FOREST CAMPAIGN NEWS  

ACTION ALERT: Endangered Species Attacks Escalate  

***********************************************  

Forest Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises  

March 22, 1995  

  

OVERVIEW & SOURCE  

The Global Action and Information Network herein provides a good   

deal of information on the various legislative proposals   

circulating that would severely constrain the present Endangered   

Species Act.  In particular, GAIN asks for calls to Senators   

stating disapproval of all the proposed anti-ESA legislation   

outlined, but particularly S 503 which is "to impose a moratorium   

on the listing of species as endangered or threatened and the   

designation of critical habitat in order to ensure that   

constitutionally protected private property rights are not   

infringed..."  Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt commented on the   

proposed moratorium that "I must say that this is one of the more   

unusual ideas I have ever seen."  This was posted in the econet   

conference (gain.ecosystem).  For further information on EcoNet   

membership, a nonprofit online system, send any message to   

<econet-info@igc.apc.org>.   

  

*******************************  

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:  

  

/* Written  5:49 PM  Mar 21, 1995 by gain in igc:gain.ecosystem */  

/* ---------- "ESA Legislative Attacks Escalate" ---------- */  

  ======  GAIN BILL REVIEW:  Attacks on ESA Escalate  =====  

  

     * * *  GLOBAL ACTION AND INFORMATION NETWORK  * * *  

       740 Front Street, Suite 355 Santa Cruz, CA 95060  

        phone: 408-457-0130     email: gain@gain.org  

           *  *  *  *  March 21, 1995  *  *  *  *  

  

  

The 1973 Endangered Species Act, due for reauthorization this   

year, is at the center of a Republican assault on deregulation and   

overspending and now faces severe attacks on its ability to   

protect endangered species and their critical habitat.  

  

Legislation designed to block protection of new endangered species   

or threatened habitat over the next six months is moving swiftly   

through both House and Senate. Three separate pieces of   

legislation (HR 889, HR 450, and S 503) include language imposing   

a moratorium on all new endangered species listings or critical   

habitat under the Endangered Species Act while Congress considers   

changes to the Act over the coming months.   

  

If passed, it is unclear how these directives would be reconciled   

with a Bush administration court agreement to put almost 400   

candidate species on the endangered and threatened species lists   

over four years.   

  

  

FUNDING FOR SPECIES PROTECTION RESCINDED   

Legislation that would rescind fiscal 1995 funding for the listing   

endangered and threatened species and designation of critical   

habitat passed the Senate March 16 as an amendment to the Defense   

Supplemental Appropriations legislation (HR 889).  

  

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) attached an amendment to HR   

889 that would halt fiscal 1995 funding for listing of endangered   

species and designation of critical habitat as a means of seeking   

quick reauthorization of the Endangered Species Act, a spokeswoman   

for Hutchison told _National Environment Daily_, March 17. The   

measure, if enacted, would rescind $1.5 million in funding to the   

Fish and Wildlife Service for any new listings or designations of    

critical habitat until the end of the fiscal year.  

  

William J. Snape, director of the legal division of Defenders of   

Wildlife told BNA (Bureau for National Affairs) that he is   

"angered" by the latest measure. "It is ill-advised, and will cost   

more over time," Snape said.  

  

According to Defenders of Wildlife, Hutchison's rider is abhorrent   

for several reasons: it prevents the listing of many species that   

need protection and could drop to dangerous levels as a result of   

the moratorium; it does not solve any economic or ecological   

problems under the ESA, rather it merely denies FWS any ability to   

conserve species pro-actively; and it purportedly evades the   

process that was established in the Senate Environment and Public   

Works Committee to analyze reauthorization of the ESA.   

  

Snape said the Defenders of Wildlife would sue the federal   

government if this funding rescission measure is enacted.   

  

  

MORATORIUM ON ESA LISTING MOVES FORWARD IN SENATE   

The full Senate Committe on Environment and Public Works is   

scheduled to mark up a ESA moratorium bill on March 23.  The   

legislation (S.503), also introduced by Hutchison (R-TX), passed   

the Senate's Drinking Water, Fisheries and Wildlife Subcommittee   

on March 14.  S 503 is specifically designed "to impose a   

moratorium on the listing of species as endangered or threatened   

and the designation of critical habitat in order to ensure that   

constitutionally protected private property rights are not   

infringed..."  

  

The freeze, approved on a 5-4 party-line vote, would prevent the   

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) from protecting any   

additional species under the Endangered Species Act while Congress   

considers changes to the law over the next six months.  

  

Two amendments to the bill were introduced and passed by the   

Drinking Water, Fisheries, and Wildlife Subcommittee. Senator Dirk   

Kempthorne, (R-ID) introduced an amendment to clarify that   

"certain other reclassifications" (i.e. delisitngs) of species are   

unaffected by the bill. Under Kempthorne's amendment the Interior   

or Commerce secretary could determine that an endangered or   

threatened species, or a designated critical habitat for any   

species can be removed from the list during the moratorium.  

  

The other amendment, introduced by Senator John Warner (R-VA),   

would restrict the Fish and Wildlife Service from limiting public   

access through Virginia's Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge to the   

False Cape State Park.  Presently, access to the park is limited   

to hiking or biking on refuge roads, and beaches, and under a 1993   

FWS permit eight state sponsored van trips per week. The FWS in   

1994 proposed a new permit that contains further limitations on   

public access to the park. The permit is currently being   

challenged by the Commonwealth of Virginia and is undergoing   

review by the FWS regional offices, according to Warner's   

amendment.   

  

The legislation must still be acted upon by the full Environment   

and Public Works Committee before going to the Senate floor.  

  

Hutchison (R-TX) said her freeze would allow Congress to rewrite   

the Endangered Species Act free from the inflamed rhetoric   

surrounding new listings.  "Reauthorization of the Act is made   

more difficult by the heated public debate over individual   

listings of species and by overzealous enforcement of the act by   

the Fish and Wildlife Service," she testified. "It's time to call   

a timeout on further listings."  

  

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and other subcommittee Democrats   

acknowledged that changes must be made in the act. But they joined   

environmentalists in arguing that a freeze could result in   

extinction of vulnerable plant or animal species.  

  

A freeze would prevent the government from listing 118 plant and   

animal species currently under consideration for protection. Most   

of those affected listings are plants - which already aren't   

entitled to protection on private property.  

  

Boxer (D-CA) repeatedly challenged her Texas colleague to explain   

why plant species shouldn't be exempted from the freeze. She cited   

the Pacific yew, once logged to near extinction for its bark and   

now proving itself as a treatment for breast and ovarian cancer.   

"To me, it is the height of arrogance to turn our backs on   

nature," Boxer said. "A moratorium is a cover word for killing."   

  

Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt testified before the Drinking   

Water, Fisheries and Wildlife Subcommittee.that six-month freeze   

on new listings under the Endangered Species Act would constitute   

"a blunderbuss approach" to overhaul of the 1973 legislation,   

"Obviously, I'm not here to support a moratorium," Babbitt said.   

"I must say that this is one of the more unusual ideas I have ever   

seen."  

  

Randall D. Snodgrass, director of Wildlife Policy at the National   

Audubon Society told BNA March 14 that he is "very disappointed   

with the vote."  Snodgrass said he thinks that the vote "could   

mean the extinction of a number of species that won't be protected   

under the ESA."  The motivation of Hutchison's bill (S 503) is   

"called into question," said Snodgrass.  

  

Snodgrass said that S 503 may die after being reported out of the   

full Senate committee. S 503 may become a "Christmas Tree" bill   

with lots of non-germane amendments attached to it, according to   

Snodgrass. If that happens the Senate leadership may be afraid to   

bring it to the floor for debate, according to Snodgrass. "One   

Senator's (Christmas) ornament is another's coal in the stocking,"   

said Snodgrass.   

  

At the present time there are 3 cosponsors of this bill, 1   

Democrat and 2 Republicans.  

  

ESA IN THE HOUSE  

The House is also succeeding in this legislative trend to freeze   

new endangered species and critical habitat protection.  

  

In late February, the House approved a two-year moratorium on new   

species listings as part of a broader regulatory moratorium bill   

it already has approved [H.R.450] and sent to the Senate. Not a   

single member rose to speak against the amendment.  

  

Following House passage, the bill went to the Senate, where   

Government Operations Committee Chair William V. Roth (R-DE) has   

said it is sure to be altered.  

  

  

                    =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=  

                         ACTION  

                    =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=  

  

Contact members of the full Senate Comittee on Environment and   

Public Works as soon as possible.  Urge them to vote against S.   

503 - don't let it even reach the Senate floor.  NOTE: a list of   

committee members and phone numbers is provided below.  

  

Contact your Senators - tell them your opinion on ESA and the   

bills currently in the Senate that would drastically weaken    

protection.  Vote no on S. 503 if it should come to the floor for   

a vote.  

  

     *Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works*  

            In Order by Seniority Within Party  

  

ADDRESS:  Dirksen Building, Room 456  

          1st & C Streets, NE  

          Washington, D.C. 20510  

PHONE:    202-224-6176  

  

------------------------------------------------------------  

       Republicans (9)                  Democrats (7)  

    -------------------------         ----------------------       

1.   CHAFEE (R-RI)                1.   BAUCUS (D-MT)  

          Chair                      Ranking Minority Member  

2.   WARNER (R-VA)                2.   MOYNIHAN (D-NY)  

3.   SMITH, ROBERT C. (R-NH)      3.   LAUTENBERG (D-NJ)  

4.   FAIRCLOTH (R-NC)             4.   REID (D-NV)  

5.   KEMPTHORNE (R-ID)            5.   GRAHAM, BOB (D-FL)  

6.   INHOFE (R-OK)                6.   LIEBERMAN (D-CT)  

7.   THOMAS (R-WY)                7.   BOXER (D-CA)  

8.   MCCONNELL (R-KY)  

9.   BOND (R-MO)  

  

-------------------  

Sources:  

  

"Bill to Rescind Funding for ESA Lisitngs Clears Senate as Rider   

to DOD Funding Bill" , _BNA National Environment Dail_, 3/21/95  

  

Description and Status of S. 503, Endangered Species Listing   

Moratorium Act of 1995, Legi-Slate, 3/17/95  

  

"Environmental Focus - Getting Ready for Round Two," _National   

Journal_, 3/11/95, Pg. 644  

  

"House Moves Toward Approval of Executive-Branch Bill,"    

_Washington Post_, 2/23/95  

  

"House Panel Endorses Freeze on Endangered Species Listings,"   

_Washington Post_, 3/14/95  

  

"Objections to GOP ideas Slow Congressional Pace", _Congressional   

Quarterly_, 3/12/95  

  

Senate Subcommittee Approves Moratorium on Endangered Species Act,   

_BNA National Environment Daily_, 3/15/95, (Article No. 20741307)   

  

_Washington Post_ article, 3/8/95  

  

 --------------------------------------------------------------  

  Want quick, easy access to up-to-the minute news on   

environmental legislation and policy? GAIN tracks more than fifty   

bills in Congress. This report is one of the many legislative   

summaries, updates, and action alerts that the Global Action and   

Information Network posts every week. You can now receive timely,   

regular postings like this directly to your email address by   

becoming a GAIN member. You'll also receive other GAIN   

publications and services -- all for just $25 a year. For more   

information, contact GAIN at <info@gain.org>.  

  

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS###

You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal 

campaign use; including writing letters, organizing campaigns and 

forwarding.  All efforts are made to provide accurate, timely 

pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all 

information rests with the reader.  Check out our Gaia Forest 

Conservation Archives at URL=   

http://forests.lic.wisc.edu/forests/gaia.html

 

Networked by:

Ecological Enterprises

Email (best way to contact)-> gbarry@forests.org 

Phone->(608) 233-2194  ||  Fax->(608) 231-2312