*******************************
PNG
RAINFOREST CAMPAIGN NEWS
Malaysian
Logging Sparks Land Row with Solomon Islands Locals
*******************************
Forest
Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises
June 5,
1995
OVERVIEW
& SOURCE
The IPS
provides additional details on the Malaysian logging
efforts
of Pavavua island in the Solomon Islands.
The new pro-
industrial
logging government has granted logging rights to the
island
despite protest from the people who live there and whose
land
rights are not respected by law. This
piece may NOT be
reprinted
without permission as per the usual IPS restrictions
noted
in their entirety at the end of the article.
This was
posted
in econet's ips.english conference. For
further
information
on EcoNet membership, a nonprofit online
system,
send any message to <econet-info@igc.apc.org>.
*******************************
RELAYED
TEXT STARTS HERE:
/*
Written 4:11 PM Jun
3, 1995 by igc:newsdesk in
peg:ips.english
*/
/*
---------- "SOLOMON ISLANDS: Malaysian Logging" ---------- */
Copyright 1994 InterPress Service, all
rights reserved.
Worldwide distribution via the APC
networks.
*** 31-May-95 ***
Title:
SOLOMON ISLANDS: Malaysian Logging Sparks Land Row with
Locals
By
Kalinga Seneviratne
SYDNEY,
May 31 (IPS) - Logging by Malaysian companies has
marginalised
local communities in their own country, but now their
activities
are affecting people in the South Pacific as well.
On the
island of Pavuvu, 50 km northwest of Honiara in the
central
province of the Solomon Islands, local landowners have
been
caught in a bitter row with the government since it granted
the
Malaysian firm Marving Brothers logging rights two months ago.
The
licence was given only days after the government dismissed
the
premier of the central province, Nelson Ratu, a strong
opponent
of logging in Pavuvu.
The
non-governmental group Soltrust estimates the tiny island's
forests
have more than 895,000 cubic metres of logs. It says the
local
people should be able to harvest these timber resources --
worth
more than 120 million dollars at current prices -- using
their
own sustainable logging methods over a period of time.
If
foreign logging companies are allowed to come in, it says,
local
landowners will get only four million dollars in royalties
while
the government will earn 40 million dollars in export levies
and the
logging firms will make a profit of 35 million dollars.
But the
government of the Solomon Islands has other plans for
the
islanders. The environment ministry last month said the
agreement
with Marving Bros includes the resettlement of thousands
of
people in Pavuvu where the company is to build new villages
complete
with roads, water facilities, clinics and schools.
The
government is in fact presenting it as a development
project
for the islands, where people from the over-populated
areas
of the Russell Islands will be resettled in Pavuvu.
It says
up to 200 families will be given 10 hectares of land to
be
registered under their names. But it points out that the
resettlement
scheme will require the clearing of the land, which
is
basically the contract Marving Bros got.
And the
government claims it owns the lands anyway and the
people
living there are not considered the traditional owners. The
logging
deal, it says, will enable them to have their own piece of
land.
But the islanders insist the land is rightfully theirs and
have
vowed to fight the decision to allow logging in Pavuvu.
During
a fact-finding mission by an opposition and NGO team
this
month, a prominent Pavuvu community member Simon Ghata said
they
had formulated their own development and resettlement plan
for
Pavuvu with the help of an expatriate lawyer.
Under
the plan, they were to set up the Lavukal Resources
Development
Company which has already been registered and includes
a
majority of the Russell islanders. The plan did not include
large
scale logging but focused on the resettlement of islanders.
Ghata
said the government rejected the plan but adopted the
resettlement
component and merged it with its logging scheme.
''They
used it to make the logging plans more attractive to the
local
people,'' he said.
One NGO
worker in the fact-finding team said Russell Islanders
complained
their government was ''turning a blind eye and a deaf
ear''
to their cries for an immediate end to logging and the
return
of the islands that rightfully belong to them.
Abraham
Baenisia, head of the Solomon Islands Development
Trust,
told IPS that the opposition has claimed the downfall of
the
government of Prime Minister Hilly Billy last year had been
engineered
by logging interests.
At last
year's South Pacific Forum meeting in Brisbane, Billy
and his
Australian counterpart Paul Keating announced a landmark
'aid-for-nature'
swap wherein Australia was to give an aid package
of 1.48
million U.S. dollars in return for saving certain areas of
the
Solomon Islands from the loggers.
Baenisia
says all these agreements have come to nothing. The
present
government has lifted the log ban imposed by its
predecessor,
so loggers continue to strip the country's forests.
Marving
Bros general manager C K Ling, speaking to IPS from
Honiara,
confirmed they have started logging in Pavuvu and will be
exporting
logs to Japan soon. He said they plan to operate in
Pavuvu
for about two and a half years and will be paying the
Solomon
Islands government 44 percent of the FOB price of the logs
as
royalties under the agreement.
''The
island belongs to the government and we operate under
agreement
with the government. (So) we log according to government
plan
only,'' he said. Ling denied the deal included roads, schools
and
clinics, but said they have already built a health centre.
Asked
what he thought about local opposition to logging in
Pavuvu,
Ling said: ''We are foreigners, we know nothing about the
local
situation. Only when the government tells us to go in, we go
in.
Other (matters) are handled by the government.''
But the
Solomon Islands government has been tight-lipped on the
issue.
The prime minister's office declined to comment and instead
referred
IPS to the office of the Cabinet, which in turn said the
Department
of Information was the one to ask.
A
spokesman at the department said: ''If you want to talk to us
about
Pavuvu, I'm afraid we are not able to help you at present.''
A
report by the opposition on their mission to Pavuvu said:
''From
the expressed feelings of the (local) people... reports of
support
for the resettlement scheme and its logging component on
Pavuvu
must now be seriously questioned.''
The
report said the motive for the government's resettlement
scheme
is purely based on commercialism, with very little or no
consideration
to basic needs and aspirations of the people.
Local
headmaster Stanley Sade said they have been fighting for
their
land for 30 years not because they want to get rich but
because
they need more land for their growing population.
He said
they do not need development that takes away their
resources,
but that which suits them and their culture. ''Pavuvu
belongs
to us,'' said Sade. ''It does not belong to the white men
who
took it away from us through unscrupulous means with bottles,
tobacco
and pipes.''
Ironically
it is these questionable land acquisitions by the
colonisers
that have made it possible for the government to claim
it owns
the land and provide the legal basis for issuing licenses
to
foreign logging firms. (END/IPS/KS/LNH/95)
Origin:
Manila/SOLOMON ISLANDS/
----
[c] 1994, InterPress Third World News Agency (IPS)
All rights reserved
May not be reproduced, reprinted or posted
to any system or
service outside of the APC
networks, without specific
permission from IPS. This limitation includes distribution
via
Usenet News, bulletin board systems, mailing lists,
print media
and broadcast. For information
about cross-
posting, send a message to
<ips-info@igc.apc.org>.
For
information
about print or broadcast reproduction please
contact the IPS coordinator at
<ipsrom@gn.apc.org>.
###RELAYED
TEXT ENDS###
This
document is a PHOTOCOPY and all recipients should seek
permission
from the source for reprinting. You are
encouraged to
utilize
this information for personal campaign use; including
writing
letters, organizing campaigns and forwarding.
All efforts
are
made to provide accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate
responsibility
for verifying all information rests with the
reader. Check out our Gaia Forest Conservation
Archives at URL=
http://forests.lic.wisc.edu/forests/gaia.html
Networked
by:
Ecological
Enterprises
Email
(best way to contact)-> gbarry@forests.org
Phone->(608)
233-2194 || Fax->(608) 231-2312