*********************************************** 

WORLDWIDE BIODIVERSITY/FOREST CAMPAIGN NEWS 

IUCN Expects Tiger to be Virtually Extinct in Wild by 1999 

*********************************************** 

Forest Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises 

April 14, 1995 

 

OVERVIEW & SOURCE 

In the following piece, the IUCN goes through each country  

possessing Tigers and assess conservation chances there.  They  

conclude that the final battle to save the tiger must be launched  

now, and that further delay can only lead quickly to the  

extinction of the tiger.  This item was posted in econet's  

env.wildlife conference. 

 

******************************* 

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE: 

 

/** env.wildlife: 699.0 **/ 

** Topic: Tiger: IUCN Press Conference 3/95 ** 

** Written  2:51 PM  Apr  5, 1995 by usfwsia in cdp:env.wildlife  

** 

Press conference by Peter Jackson, 

Chairman, IUCN Cat Specialist Group  

New Delhi, India, 30 March 1995 

  

The tiger will be virtually extinct in the wild by 1999 unless  

India and the other range states declare open war on poachers and  

illegal traders and throw all the resources required into the  

battle. Some scattered individuals will remain and produce some  

young for a decade or two in the 21st century, but, in fact, we  

shall have seen the end of the tiger. 

  

A review of the situation in India and south-east Asia shows that  

poaching is accelerating, with well-organized illegal trade  

networks operating, sometimes with the connivance of officials.  

Actual seizures indicate that hundreds of tigers are being poached  

every year in India alone, primarily for traditional Chinese  

medicine.  

  

If the governments of tiger range states do not have the political  

will to save the tiger, then the future is bleak for wild nature  

and human welfare. Tiger conservation does not involve just a  

single species. It means saving large tracts of Asia's tropical  

forests and their wildlife. Forests and the natural world in  

generaltion of all life on earth, including that of humans, who  

rely on complex ecological systems for food, water, clean air, and  

many products used in their lives. Economic development will  

ultimately fail unless recognition is given to the vital   

importance of maintaining natural systems, of which the tiger 

is a part and a symbol. 

  

India 

  

India has become a killing ground for tigers. Undercover  

investigations by members and associates of the Cat Specialist 

Group and TRAFFIC International have been involved in the seizure  

of the bones, skins and claws, which could account for around 100  

tigers poached in the past two years. The seizures also included  

206 leopard skins, 18 snow leopard skins, 3 clouded leopard skins,  

565 leopard cat skins and 773 skins of desert, jungle, marbled and  

fishing cats, not to mention other species. Seizures of thousands  

of skins and other parts of a whole range of Illegal trade  

networks which convey tiger bones and other parts to consumer  

countries, primarily China, South Korea and Taiwan, have been  

identified. Skins are smuggled to other countries. Fiftytwo  

persons were arrested and charged in these cases. The involvement  

of Kashmiri militants and traders, as well as Tibetans, has been  

established. 

  

The number of tigers known to have been killed is only the tip of  

the iceberg. Application of the "iceberg formula" (i.e. what is  

visible is only a fifth of the whole) to the above figures  

suggests that over 500 tigers may have been poached in the past  

two years. The loss of female reproductive potential and the  

disruption of the social system of tigers, which leads to low cub  

survival, means that the impact is far greater than the actual  

number of tigers lost. 

  

The situation is almost certainly worse in other tiger range  

countries in South-East Asia and the Russian Far East, which 

together hold fewer than 2,000 of the tens of thousands of tigers  

which existed a century ago. There is no evidence that effective  

protection is being provided in these countries. Tiger parts are  

openly displayed, even in capital cities. 

  

The Sino-Indian Protocol on Conservation of the Tiger 

  

The Sino-Indian Protocol on Conservation of the Tiger is a welcome  

step towards international cooperation, but Indian members of the  

Cat Specialist Group who met at Kanha on 20-21 March (see list at  

end) consider that it has some objectional features. 

    

Article IV states: 

  

"Encourage, on an experimental basis, captive breeding activities  

with a view to release of the species into the wild."  

 

This article has no relevance to the problem of tiger conservation  

in India and diverts attention, resources and effort from the  

urgent task of protecting existing tiger populations, which are  

gravely threatened by poaching for skins, bones and other parts  

for Chinese medicine. India has between 3,000 and 4,000 tigers and  

protecting them must be given the highest priority. They breed  

well and there is clearly no need whatsoever for releasing  

captive-bred tigers. 

  

Captive breeding programmes can be valuable for biological  

research, but they are expensive. Release in the wild would be 

far more expensive, even for a single tiger, let alone the number  

which would be required to re-establish a healthy population. But  

there are no records of successful release of captive-bred tigers  

in the wild. Young tigers need to learn how to live and hunt in  

the wild from their mother over a period of up to two years before  

they become independent.  

  

Areas exist in India where tigers once lived but have recently  

been extirpated, but there is no chance of captive- bred tigers  

surviving there if the reasons for the absence of wild tigers are  

not addressed, primarily poaching. Given that the authorities have  

not been able to stop the massive poaching wave now going on, it  

is obvious that captive-bred tigers, reared at great expensive,  

would be killed too. 

  

The idea that existing tiger populations could be "topped up" with  

captive-bred animals is not practical. Tigers have a tight-knit  

social organization in which males defend territories containing  

several females, who also do not tolerate intruders. Introduced  

tigers, even given some training in captivity, would face the  

hostility of tigers in release areas. Animals without territories,  

such as an introduced tiger, are liable to be killed, or be forced  

to move to fringe areas to live on livestock. They may clash with  

local people, with possibly fatal consequences. This would  

seriously antagonize these communities and be counter-productive  

to the whole concept of tiger and wildlife conservation. 

  

In the light of the above, the Indian members of the Cat  

Specialist Group recommend that the Government of India should 

seek China's agreement to the deletion of Article IV of the Sino- 

Indian protocol. As a sovereign country, China can pursue any  

domestic policy it chooses and would not be affected by the  

deletion. 

  

The Cat Group also points out that the phrase in the Preamble  

referring to "sustainable development of the species" is nonsense.  

Human intervention in natural evolution of a wild species, means  

that it ceases to be a wild species. If the phrase is meant to  

refer to "sustainable use", it is inappropriate and objectionable  

and should not be included in an agreement on conservation of the  

tiger. 

  

Madhya Pradesh 

  

With 900 tigers reported by the 1993 census, Madhya Pradesh holds  

about one-sixth of the surviving world population, and is about to  

declare itself a "Tiger State". Accompanied by Valmik Thapar,  

Vice-Chairman (Asia) of the Cat Specialist Group, and Peter  

Lawton, Chief Executive of Global Tiger Patrol, I have just spent  

two weeks visiting the Pench, Kanha, Bandhavgarh  and Panna tiger  

reserves. They are places of exceptional natural beauty and value  

to India, and they contain a wide spectrum of the country's rich  

wildlife. 

  

 We found evidence of tigers in Kanha, Bandhavgarh and Panna  

(where we saw one tiger). We did not find tracks in Pench, but the  

reserve staff reported recent sightings. Dr Ullas Karanth, who has  

carried out many years of study of tigers and prey in Nagarhole   

National Park, has chosen Pench for a scientific survey of tiger  

presence using strategically-located camera traps, and will later  

carry out a similar survey in Kanha. 

  

Over 50 poaching incidents have occurred in Madhya Pradesh in the  

past six months, one of them on the eve of our arrival in  

Bandhavgarh, in which an attempt was made to implicate a well- 

known conservationist. The police have recovered skins and bones  

of 16 tigers. More than 30 people have been  arrested and  

prosecuted, and the police believe that hundreds are involved in  

organized illegal trade. 

  

Apart from direct poaching, the tiger is threatened by habitat  

degradation caused by livestock grazing in the four reserves. In  

Panna, for example, there are 16 villages within the reserve and  

40 outside which send in livestock. Some areas are bare of  

vegetation, except for a few trees and large patches of lantana,  

an exotic weed. If Panna is to survive as a haven for tigers and  

other wildlife, immediate action is required to move villages,  

control livestock grazing and rehabilitate the land. Diamond  

mining and stone quarrying on the reserve boundaries are also  

contributing to degradation and polluting rivers. 

  

In general, we were impressed by the dedication of Project Tiger  

staff, but concerned that, except for Kanha, vital resources, such  

as vehicles, binoculars and personnel have not been provided by  

the central and state governments to enable them to carry out  

their mission. We have decided to provide emergency aid.  

  

At the same time, we urge the authorities to act at once to carry  

out their commitment to saving the tiger and its habitat. The  

large number of Indians, as well as foreigners, who visit the  

reserves shows what a high value people place on wild nature. 

  

Members of the Cat Specialist Group are concerned about the 

situation in many places in India. Lack of resources is  

handicapping protection and management and there are fears that 

at least 11 of the Project Tiger reserves may soon deteriorate  

below the point of no return. They include Buxa, Dudhwa,  

Indravati, Manas, Nagarjunasagar, Palamau, Panna, Pench,  

Ranthambhore, Sariska and Valmiki. The situation is well known 

to the authorities, and in no case is the situation irreversible  

if immediate action is taken. 

  

It is unfortunate that at this very moment of crisis, the Finance  

Ministry has placed a moratorium on purchase by Project Tiger of  

vehicles, which are essential if the war against poachers is to be  

won. International organizations, government and non-government,  

are ready to provide funds if  invited to do so. 

  

Vietnam and Malaysia 

  

Earlier this month I visited Vietnam, where we held a workshop on  

tiger conservation attended also by representatives of Cambodia  

and Laos. Compared with India, little is known of their tiger  

populations, except that they have been drastically reduced. The  

three countries agreed to cooperate because tigers are mainly  

found in the mountains which span their frontiers. 

  

All three countries lack resources and personnel to deal with the  

grave situation. Action projects were drafted for each country,  

and a representative of WWF International pledged the necessary  

funds. 

  

Tiger parts are openly displayed in these countries. In Hanoi, I  

found over 40 tiger canine teeth made into pendants in just four  

curio shops within a radius of 100 metres. 

  

In Malaysia, which has estimated its tiger population at 600-650  

without actual surveys, around 250 complaints of livestock  

predation were received by the Wildlife Department in 1994.   

Although Malaysia is a relatively wealthy country, wildlife  

management and protection staff have not received adequate   

support. Officials said they would welcome cooperation with their  

Indian counterparts. 

  

Global Tiger Forum 

  

Eleven tiger range countries agreed in Delhi in March 1994 to  

establish a Global Tiger Forum to coordinate their tiger  

conservation programmes. To become effective five ratifications 

are required. At the present time only two have been received. 

India itself only ratified the treaty one month ago. The lack of   

urgency and political will displayed could be fatal for the tiger. 

  

CONCLUSION 

  

THE FINAL BATTLE TO SAVE THE TIGER MUST BE LAUNCHED NOW. FURTHER  

DELAY CAN ONLY LEAD QUICKLY TO THE EXTINCTION OF THE TIGER. 

       ------------------------------------------- 

  

The Cat Specialist Group is a volunteer panel of 178 biologists,  

wildlife managers and conservationists from 50 countries who are  

experts on the 36 species of wild cats. It is one of over 100  

specialist groups which form part of the Species Survival  

Commission of IUCN - The World Conservation Union, the largest  

scientific conservation organization in the world. IUCN's  

membership includes 68 State members, 92 government agencies, 55  

international non-governmental organizations, 563 national non- 

governmental organizations and 33 affiliates in 129 countries. The  

headquarters is in Gland, near Geneva, Switzerland, and there is a  

network of regional offices around the world. 

  

Cat Specialist Group members present at the Kanha meeting  

20-21 March 1995: 

  

Mr Peter Jackson,  

 Chairman, IUCN Cat Specialist Group.  

  

Mr Valmik Thapar, 

 Vice-Chairman (Asia), IUCN Cat Specialist Group, and a non- 

 official member of the Project Tiger Steering Committee. 

  

Dr Ullas Karanth, 

 Associate Research Scientist, World Conservation Society/New 

 York Zoological Society, and a member of the official Tiger 

 Crisis Cell. 

  

Mr Sanjoy Deb Roy, 

 Retired Additional Inspector General of Forests (Wildlife) and 

  a non-official member of the Project Tiger Steering Committee. 

  

Mr Pranabes Sanyal, 

 Conservator of Forests, West Bengal. 

  

Mr Madhav Gogate, 

 Conservator of Forests (Research), Maharashtra. 

  

Dr Raghunandan Chundawat, Senior Wildlife Biologist, Wildlife 

 Institute of India. 

  

Mrs Anne Wright, 

 Independent conservationist. 

  

Ms Belinda Wright 

 Executive Director, Wildlife Protection Society of India. 

  

Ms Shomita Mukherjee, 

 Research Scientist, Wildlife Institute of India.  

  

Mr Peter Lawton, 

 Chief Executive, Global Tiger Patrol (UK). 

   

For more information contact:   

  

peterjackson@gn.apc.org 

  

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS###

You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal 

campaign use; including writing letters, organizing campaigns and 

forwarding.  All efforts are made to provide accurate, timely 

pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all 

information rests with the reader.  Check out our Gaia Forest 

Conservation Archives at URL=   

http://forests.lic.wisc.edu/forests/gaia.html

 

Networked by:

Ecological Enterprises

Email (best way to contact)-> gbarry@forests.org 

Phone->(608) 233-2194  ||  Fax->(608) 231-2312