***********************************************

WORLDWIDE FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS

Guyana's Logging Freeze in Question

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises

3/18/96

 

OVERVIEW & SOURCE

The World Rainforest Movement reports on increased logging and

mining pressure in Guyana, South America.  Their logging

concession freeze announced in 1994 is looking like it will end,

as industrial logging pressures intensify.  Once again, Malaysian

and Canadian timber companies seeks to export industrial forestry

to one of the last rainforests--with little rewards for local

peoples, as royalties, taxes and forest fees being paid by loggers

in Guyana are some of the lowest in the tropics.  As elsewhere,

"Guyana is liquidating its forest assets for little national

gain."

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

 

/* Written  5:09 PM  Mar 14, 1996 by gn:wrm in igc:rainfor.genera

*/

/* ---------- "GUYANA: LOGGING FREEZE STARTS TO ME" ---------- */

From: Forest Peoples Programme <wrm>

Subject: GUYANA: LOGGING FREEZE STARTS TO MELT, MORE MINING

______________________________________________________________

 

                  WORLD RAINFOREST MOVEMENT

_____________________________________________________________

 

INFORMATION UPDATE       GUYANA                   14 MARCH 1996

 

           TIMBER CONCESSION FREEZE FEELS THE HEAT:

 

   NEW TIMBER PERMITS IMMINENT WHILE MINING MOVES SOUTH

 

There are worrying signs that the freeze in the hand out of

logging concessions to foreign companies in Guyana is about to

break. Under heavy pressure from foreign investors, the Guyanese

Government may be about to offer new permits to foreign companies,

despite promises made to the aid agencies in 1994 that no new

logging concessions would be handed out until the moribund

Forestry Commission was revived and back in control of the

*existing* timber cutting.

 

According to the national newspaper, 'Stabroek News' on 12 March

1996, the Presidential Adviser for Science, Technology and the

Environment, Navin Chandarpal has been negotiating with the

Malaysian company, Solid Timbers Sendirian Berhad, to grant it

a 500,000 hectare timber permit in the Upper Corentyne / New

River area in the extreme south of the country. This is about

half the over 1 million hectares the company had originally

sought even further south in the New River Triangle area - a

territory disputed with neighbouring Suriname. Both areas are

outside the jurisdiction of the Forestry Commission and way south

of the country's existing road network. According to the newspaper

report, the Government would first pass legislation expanding the

area of State Forests and then offer the company an exploratory

lease to the area, under which it would carry out a forest

inventory and develop a forest management and investment plan. The

same report also alleges that two other South-East Asian investor

groups including Alex Ling Lee Soon and and Vincent Tan's Berjaya

Sdn. Bhd. are still seeking further areas in the south.

 

Under its agreement with the aid agencies, the Guyanese Government

has agreed that - in order to ensure sound forest management and

profitable returns to the Guyanese Exchequer - no new timber

permits should be issued for a minimum of three years after May

1995 or until the Forestry Commission is able to regulate the

industry. Meanwhile, with the technical and financial support of

the British Overseas Development Administration, the Forestry

Commission is attempting to build up the numbers and training of

its staff and revise forestry regulations and royalties with the

initial aim of establishing control over the nearly 9 million

hectares of forests already under concession, while making the

industry a profitable source of national revenue.

 

Guyanese foresters agree that it will be years before this is

achieved and that meanwhile concessionaires are subject to minimal

supervision. This is just the kind of situation that logging

companies thrive on. Poor supervision, low taxes and cheap labour

are thus attracting investors to the country. Indeed, at present

loggers get their timber in Guyana extraordinarily cheap. A study

carried out for the World Bank in late 1995 showed that the

royalties, taxes and forest fees being paid by loggers in Guyana

are some of the lowest in the tropics, being less than a tenth of

those paid in most African and Asian countries. Moreover, since

1988 fees have been falling in real terms. Royalty rates are at

30% of their former value, while customs duties and acreage fees

have fallen by more than 90% in the past decade. On top of this,

the report states, foreign companies enjoy 'generous tax breaks

and other incentives creating conditions of unfair competition

(for local producers)'. As a result Guyana is liquidating its

forest assets for little national gain. Warns the report:

 

     This kind of 'forest mining entails a boom-and-bust pattern

     of development that can be highly disruptive to employment

     levels, trade balances, and other factors of macro-economic

     stability' (1).

 

To get around their commitment to the aid agencies not to grant

new logging licences, the Government seems to have invented the

legal fiction of 'exploratory leases' - a category of permit which

does not exist in Guyanese law. By this means the Government hopes

to keep foreign investors interested and then grant them licences

as soon as they can get away with it.

 

Aid agency officials in Georgetown have been aware of these

negotiations for some time and are also concerned by rumours that

the Canadian timber company, Buchanan Forest Products, is seeking

access to a 400,000 hectare concession on the Middle Mazaruni

river. This unlogged area was recently relinquished by Mazaruni

Forest Industries Limited (a consortium formed by members of the

Prime Group of Singapore) in exchange for the Prime Group's

takeover of the financially strapped Demerara Timbers Limited

which is exploiting a 500,000 hectare concession on the Middle

Essequibo. Buchanan's proposed operations on the Middle Mazaruni

would bring it into conflict with a number of villages of Akawaio

Indians who have inhabited the area for centuries. Under pressure

from Buchanan, which enjoys support from the Canadian Embassy in

Georgetown, the Government is alleged to be considering also

granting them a three year 'exploratory permit'.

 

Buchanan does not have an untarnished reputation back in its home

province of Ontario in Canada. A report made for the Canadian

Paperworkers Union in 1992 notes that Buchanan

 

     'has evolved into a company riddled with contradictions. On

     the one hand, it has a long history of doing all it can to

     avoid forestry, environmental and labour legislation. On

     the other hand, as it has grown, the Buchanan group of

     companies has become more mainstream.' (2)

 

The report details how Buchanan has successfully fought to reduce

labour costs and has extravagantly logged forests to maximise

profits with little regard for the damage to residual timber

stands and little concern for timber wastage. According to the

report, Buchanan has also used strongarm tactics - threatening

to close mills - to pressure politicians into granting it access

to forests. Of particular relevance to Guyana, the report

highlights how the company thrived on lax government controls,

reaping financial benefits while passing on the social and

environmental costs to be borne by others.

 

The report alleges that the company was able to avoid prosecution

for violating environmental and forest management regulations,

due to close connections with senior politicians in the

environment ministry. Tracing the company's history, the report

notes how 'laissez-faire' and political connections allowed

Buchanan to get away with repeated violations of the Crown Timber

Act, especially during the 1960s, 70s and early 80s. In recent

years, however, due to growing public concern for the environment,

supervision has tightened and compliance has been more carefully

enforced, obliging Buchanan to toe the line.

 

Despite improved compliance with forest management practices,

Buchanan has nevertheless managed to keep costs low, mainly by

defying the trades unions and avoiding obligations to its

employees. Notes the report:

 

     'Buchanan's track record in labour relations has steadily

     deteriorated from the late 1970s and throughout the 1980s.

     Buchanan's defiance of union agreements, its avoidance of

     mandated employee benefits and treatment of contract labour

     in woodlands are notorious.'

 

Mining moves south:

Meanwhile the mining industry in Guyana is also moving south.

Leading the way, again, is the Malaysian firm, Solid Timbers

Sendirian Berhad, whose wholly owned local subsidiary, Tanahmas

Gold Mining Company has just been granted a 7,000 hectare mining

lease in Camp Jaguar on the New River. The company has also

applied for a further 14,000 hectares in an adjoining area.

 

Mining is also intensifying in other indigenous areas. Carib

Indians on the Barama river report several new gold mining

operations on their traditional lands including Citadel Co.,

Sonic Soil and the Roraima Mining Company.

 

Refs:

(1). Lorene Flaming, 'An Economic Analysis of the Timber Industry

in Guyana: Prospects for Stengthening State Capacity and Private

Incentives for Sustainable Forest Management'. Environment

Department, World Bank, Washington, 25 September 1995.

 

(2). David Frood and Larry Sanders, 'Lean and Mean: the forest

labyrinth of Ken Buchanan'. Report for the Canadian Paperworkers

Union, 25 February 1992.

 

For more information contact: Forest Peoples Programme, World

Rainforest Movement, 8 Chapel Row, Chadlington, OX7 3NA, England

Tel: 01608 676691 Fax: + 44 1608 676743 Email: wrm@gn.apc.org

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS###

You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal

campaign use; including writing letters, organizing campaigns and

forwarding.  All efforts are made to provide accurate, timely

pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all

information rests with the reader.  Check out our Gaia Forest

Archives at URL=   http://forests.lic.wisc.edu/forests/gaia.html

 

Networked by:

Ecological Enterprises  ||  Phone/Fax->(608) 233-2194

Email-> gbarry@forests.org