***********************************************

WORLDWIDE FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS

United States Vanishing Forests

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises

2/20/96

 

OVERVIEW & SOURCE

In addition to continued industrial forestry and "salvage"

timber sales (which by some accounts may mean lack of

natural forests throughout the United States with the

exceptions of protected lands within 50 years), United

States forests "are sick and dying, from environmental

pollution and destructive forestry practices."  The United

States, once a leader in environmental initiatives and

largely a wilderness only a few hundred years ago, continues

to move towards becoming a biological wasteland.  Acid rain

and other forest disturbances are becoming evident, the

Third World Networks (TWN) states, in decreased forest

health.  The following was written and posted in the TWN

econet conference, twn:features.

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

/* Written  6:58 PM  Feb 16, 1996 by twn in igc:twn.features

*/

/* ---------- "US:Vanishing Forests" ---------- */

FORESTS VANISHING IN THE U.S.A.

 

A new book gives a detailed picture of how trees all over

the USA are sick and dying, from environmental pollution and

destructive forestry practices. The US Forest Service,

meanwhile, is downplaying the importance of tree disease and

death.

 

By Peter Montague

 

Trees are sick and dying everywhere in the US. At first

blush this seems like an extreme statement. But a new book,

The Dying of the Trees by Charles Little, will convince you

it is true.

 

This book gives a detailed picture of trees sick and dying.

It seems clear that the dying trees are one more sign of

danger, one more warning that something is terribly wrong.

 

Why are the trees dying? The reasons are many and varied. In

New England, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia,

Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, it's a combination of acid rain

and clear-cuts; in California it's killer smog; in Arizona

and New Mexico and elsewhere, it's excessive ultraviolet

light filtering through the earth's damaged ozone shield;

other places, it's pesticides, or toxic heavy metals

released by burning coal and oil; in Alaska and Florida it's

rising temperatures and rising sea levels from global

warming; in Colorado, Oregon and Washington state it's

destructive forestry practices that leave forests weakened,

unable to withstand extremes of weather or attacks by

insects or fungi.

 

In most places, it's probably combinations of all these

factors. Scientists are playing catch-up now, conducting

studies that may explain the complicated causes of

widespread tree death.

 

Answers come slowly. Hubert `Hub' Vogelmann, a botanist at

the University of Vermont, wanted to study an undisturbed

forest, so in 1965 he made a thorough survey of Camel's

Hump, a 1,245-metre peak in the Green Mountains. So far as

he knew, he was describing a healthy ecosystem. He measured

the types and sizes of the trees, and various other aspects

of the ecosystem. He had no particular purpose in mind,

other than to gather knowledge about nature.

 

Periodically, he re-surveyed Camel's Hump, and a pattern

began to emerge. The trees were dying. His survey in 1979,

compared to the baseline study of 1965, showed a 48% loss of

red spruce; a 73% loss of mountain maple; a 49% loss of

striped maple, and a 35% loss of sugar maple.

 

Vogelmann was able to show that the health of Camel's Hump

had begun to decline in the period 1950-1960. Similar

studies in the Black Forest of Germany, and in southern

Canada, revealed that the most likely cause was acid rain.

 

Acid rain occurs when coal and oil are burned, releasing

sulfur which combines with rain (or fog or snow) to make

acid precipitation. Acidity is measured in units called pH.

Pure water has a pH of 7 -- it is `neutral' -- neither

acidic nor alkaline. Pure rainwater has a pH of 5.6 --

slightly acidic because, while in the air, rain absorbs

carbon dioxide to form a weak solution of carbonic acid.

 

After World War II the US saw a massive rise in use of

fossil fuels, coal and oil. The resulting smoke was obvious,

and obviously harmful; in Donora, Pennsylvania, in 1948,

half the people in the town fell ill for three days because

of coal smoke in the air. Twenty people died. In London in

1952, coal smoke killed 4,000 people during a pollution

episode.

 

The official response in the 1950s was to build smokestacks

hundreds of metres tall, to dilute the pollution. Today the

Ohio River valley is still dotted by enormous coal-burning

power plants with stacks as high as 200 or even 300 metres.

These tall stacks allow the sulfurous pollution to travel

1,500 km or more, where it forms acid rain across the

Adirondack Mountains of New York, and across northern New

England and southern Canada.

 

In Vermont, the rain has a pH of 3.8 to 4.0. The pH scale is

`logarithmic' so a change from normal (5.6) down to 4.6

means the rain has gotten 10 times as acidic; at 3.6 the

rain is 100 times as acidic as normal.

 

It wasn't until 1972 that Eugene Likens (then at Cornell

University) and F Herbert Bormann at Yale discovered acid

rain. But meanwhile acid rain had been falling on northern

New York and New England, and on southern Canada for about

20 years.

 

What Vogelmann has been able to show by studying Camel's

Hump for 30 years is that acid rain doesn't affect just the

trees; it affects the soil and thus the entire ecosystem.

Soil contains a large amount of aluminium, but it occurs in

the form of aluminium silicates; in that form, aluminium is

not available to the roots of plants. But acid rain

dissolves the silicates, releasing the aluminium and making

it available to plants.

 

When plants get aluminium into their roots and their

vascular system, the roots clog, which prevents the plant

from taking up adequate nutrients and water. The trees are

weakened, and may then fall prey to extreme cold, or to

insects or pathogens.

 

Acid rain not only releases aluminium. It also releases

other minerals -- calcium, magnesium, phosphorus -- which

are fertiliser for the tree. Acid rain releases these

fertilisers to be washed out of the soil, leaving the soil

depleted of nutrients.  That is not the end of the problem.

The roots of many trees create a symbiotic relationship 

with an orange-coloured sponge-like fungus called

mycorrhiza. The tree roots provide sustenance to the

mycorrhiza, and the mycorrhiza helps the tree roots gather

water and nutrients from the soil. But acid rain kills

mycorrhiza, thus further reducing the ability of trees to

absorb water and nutrients.

 

Acid rain also kills off portions of the detritus food

chain. The detritus food chain is all the microscopic

creatures that `compost' leaves, twigs, pine needles, dead

branches and so forth, turning them back into soil. Because

the detritus food chain is damaged by acid rain, forest

`litter' builds up on the floor of the forest. The litter

prevents new saplings from taking root -- they cannot reach

through the litter to make contact with the soil below.

Furthermore, the litter promotes the growth of ferns, which

give off substances that inhibit the growth of red spruce

saplings, among others.

 

This is not a complete description of problems caused by

acid rain, but it gives a sense of complexity of ecosystems

and how they can become unbalanced by thoughtless human

intrusions.

 

Given the high rates of tree death and the widespread nature

of the problem, one would think that the community of

botanists, forest ecosystem specialists and US Forest

Service employees would be up in arms, advocating change.

But one would be disappointed.

 

Throughout the book, Charles Little describes studies and

statements by the US Forest Service downplaying the

importance of tree disease and death. For example, in 1991

the Procter Maple Research Centre at the University of

Vermont pinpointed acid rain and other air pollution as an

important cause of decline of sugar maples in Vermont.

 

`We think we are looking at the early stages of an epidemic

problem,' the centre's report said. The following year the

US Forest Service issued a report saying that 90% of the

sugar maples surveyed were healthy and the overall numbers

and volume of sugar maples were increasing.

 

It turned out the Forest Service had used a tricky way of

counting dead trees; only the standing dead were counted --

those lying on the ground were not.

 

Forest-protection activists in the Pacific north-west have

long considered the Forest Service a rogue agency, captured

by the forest products industry. Under the Reagan and Bush

administrations, the situation grew so extreme that when

Jack Ward Thomas took over the leadership of the Forest

Service in 1992, he immediately issued six `messages' to

personnel throughout the agency. The first three messages

were: (1) Obey the law;  (2) Tell the truth; (3) Implement

ecosystem management. That such orders had to be issued

speaks volumes about the past performance of this federal

agency.

 

In 1993 there was evidence of new candour in the Forest

Service. A report issued that year said timber mortality, on

a volume basis, had increased 24% between 1986 and 1991, `in

all regions, on all ownerships, and for both hardwoods and

softwoods'. Hardwoods were particularly affected, and

particularly in the south, where the mortality increase was

37%. - Third World Network Features

 

About the writer: Peter Montague, PhD, is director of the

Environmental Research Foundation in Annapolis, Maryland,

USA.

  

When reproducing this feature, please credit Third World

Network Features and (if applicable) the cooperating

magazine or agency involved in the article, and give the

byline. Please send us cuttings.

 

 

Published by Third World Network 228, Macalister Road, 10400

Penang, Malaysia. Email: twn@igc.apc.org; 

                         twnpen@twn.po.my

Tel: (+604)2293511,2293612 & 2293713; Fax: (+604)2298106.

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS###

You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal

campaign use; including writing letters, organizing

campaigns and forwarding.  All efforts are made to provide

accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate responsibility for

verifying all information rests with the reader.  Check out

our Gaia Forest Archives at URL=  

http://gaia1.ies.wisc.edu/research/pngfores/

 

Networked by:

Ecological Enterprises  ||  Phone/Fax->(608) 233-2194

Email-> gbarry@forests.org