***********************************************

WORLDWIDE FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS

World Bank to Address Brazilian Rainforest & Indigenous Issues

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises

2/12/96

 

OVERVIEW & SOURCE

The Indianist Missionary Council of Brazil reports that the World

Bank is to make a stand on the new Brazilian government decree

which reneges on earlier pledges of demarcation of Indian lands. 

Much of the Amazon is to be opened to miners, settlers and other

invaders.  Local organizations are pressuring the World Bank to

discontinue bank funding in several key areas.  This item was

posted in econet's rainfor.general conference.  See the Brazil

directory:

   gopher://gaia1.ies.wisc.edu:70/11/research/wforests/brazil

of the Gaia Forest Archives:

   http://gaia1.ies.wisc.edu/research/pngfores

for more information.

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

 

/* Written  5:57 AM  Feb 12, 1996 by ax:cimi in igc:rainfor.genera

*/

/* ---------- "World Bank receives Capoib represen" ---------- */

Newsletter n. 196

              WORLD BANK RECEIVES CAPOIB REPRESENTATIVES

   

The World Bank will take a stand on Decree 1,775 in two weeks.

This was the main result of the meeting between representatives of

the Bank and of the Council for the Articulation of Indigenous

Peoples and Organizations of Brazil (Capoib) that was held on

Tuesday, February 6. In the meeting, that was held at the request

of the Indians, a document was delivered to the representatives of

the World Bank requesting the temporary suspension of funds to be

released to the Indigenous Lands Project, Panafloro and Prodeagro.

The indigenous representatives warned that ``the implementation of

any plan or project to legalize and demarcate indigenous lands

according to the true interests and rights of indigenous peoples

may be jeopardized as long as the present Indianist policy remains

in force, which today is essentially based on Decree 1,775/96.''

   

According to Capoib, Brazil has adopted a deliberate policy to

reduce indigenous territories, which includes the establishment of

smooth mechanisms for states and municipalities, as well as

invaders and other persons interested in indigenous lands, to

contest the  bounds of those territories. ``With the publication

of Decree 1,775/96, the federal administration is clearly

forsaking its constitutional duty to demarcate indigenous lands...

demarcations are not being determined by indigenous rights, but

rather by the alleged right of third parties and public powers to

contest them,'' Capoib denounces. The representative of the World

Bank in Brazil, Dennis Mahar, informed the indigenous leaders and

entities attending the meeting that the legal department of the

Bank is studying the new decree and that the position to be taken

by the institution in relation to it will take into account the

arguments that were presented at the meeting.

   

Last Monday, February 5, Minister Nelson Jobim took part in the

first debate on the decree promoted by the newspaper Folha de Sao

Paulo. In that debate, which was also attended by jurist Dalmo

Dallari, who is against Decree 1,775, the Minister resorted to old

arguments to defend it. Uncomfortable in the presence of an

audience that tended to favor the revocation of Decree 1,775, the

Minister revealed that he will not discuss the matter with anyone

who is against the possibility of contesting the demarcation of

indigenous areas. The Newspaper cited Cimi and Capoib as examples

of entities criticized by Jobim.

 

LAWYERS REQUEST REVOCATION OF THE DECREE

 

The Environment Commission of the Brazilian BAR Association, Sco

Paulo Division, approved on February 5 a motion rejecting Decree

1,775. The document asks the Office of the Attorney General to

take appropriate measures to revoke or annul Decree 1,775, which

in the opinion of the Commission is aimed at creating procedural

confusion, gives rise to a historical-anthropological distrust on

the part of indigenous peoples and shows ignorance of the original

right of indigenous peoples. ``We see that the adversary system...

does not comply with any rule providing for terms, means for

presenting evidence or procedures.'' The Motion against the Decree

of the Brazilian BAR Association was sent to the President of the

Republic, to the minister of Justice, to the ambassadors of the G-

7 countries and to the Interamerican Human Rights Committee.

 

Brasilia, February 9th, 1996

Indianist Missionary Council

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS###

You are encouraged to utilize this information for personal

campaign use; including writing letters, organizing campaigns and

forwarding.  All efforts are made to provide accurate, timely

pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all

information rests with the reader.  Check out our Gaia Forest

Archives at URL=   http://gaia1.ies.wisc.edu/research/pngfores/

 

Networked by:

Ecological Enterprises  ||  Phone/Fax->(608) 233-2194

Email-> gbarry@forests.org