***********************************************

WORLDWIDE FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS

African Rainforest Logging Damage Permanent

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises

     http://forests.org/

 

4/12/97

OVERVIEW, SOURCE & COMMENTARY by EE

A Duke University researcher has completed a long-term study on the

effects of timber cutting on a rain forest, whose results are reported

in the new book _ Ecology of an African Rain Forest: Logging in Kibale

and the Conflict between Conservation and Exploitation_.  He has

concluded that nearly all harvest practices "are far too intensive to

protect rain forest ecology."  Given the drastic changes in ecology,

the researcher advocates that rain forest preserves be spared

completely from logging.  Additionally, if rain forests are to be

logged sustainably, harvesting must be very light to minimize

disruption--"no more than one large tree per hectare per century, done

by hand to minimize forest disruption."  The prescriptive results of

this research are wholeheartedly embraced here--larger tracts of

rainforests must be put in preserves to insure ecological continuity,

and local peoples that wish to carry out small scale eco-timber

operations must be assisted to do so under an appropriate eco-forestry

management plan.  Ideally, preservation of a larger preserve could be

coupled to righteous eco-management of an adjoining buffer zone.

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

 

Rainforest Logging Damage Permanent

The Environment News Service

Copyright 1997

Posted to the web: Fri Apr 11 18:06:27 EDT 1997

http://www.envirolink.org/environews/enews.html

 

DURHAM, North Carolina, Apr. 11, 1997 (ENS) - The delicate ecological

web of the tropical rain forest is permanently unraveled by heavy

logging, according to the most comprehensive long-term study yet done

of the effects of timber cutting on a rain forest.

 

The researcher, Duke University biologist Thomas Struhsaker, concludes

that even so-called "sustainable" harvesting practices used in some

countries are far too intensive to protect rain forest ecology. He

advocates that rain forest preserves be spared completely from

logging. And, for rain forests that are to be logged sustainably,

harvesting must mimic natural treefalls - consisting of no more than

one large tree per hectare per century, done by hand to minimize

forest disruption.

 

In a new book, Ecology of an African Rain Forest: Logging in Kibale

and the Conflict between Conservation and Exploitation, published by

the University of Florida Press, Struhsaker and his colleagues detail

their 23 years of research in the Kibale rainforest of Uganda. The

study marks the first time the interrelations of both plants and

animals have been incorporated into a long-term study of logging.

 

"The destruction of these forests is indisputably one of the greatest

ecological disasters in the history of Homo sapiens," Struhsaker said.

Recent estimates find that an area of tropical rain forest the size of

Greece or the state of Florida is being converted to agriculture each

year.

 

The book describes the impact of Uganda's severe political upheaval on

the scientists' research and conservation activities. The civil wars -

in which hundreds of thousands of Ugandans were massacred - also

thrust Struhsaker and his fellow scientists into perilous encounters

with soldiers and guerilla bands. And, the scientists' insistence on

reporting poaching and official corruption in the national reserve led

to death threats.

 

"This is a study that really looks at the impact of logging on the

wildlife," he said. "Most of the others have looked primarily at

commercial timber species, not even considering the rest of the

flora."

 

Such breadth was particularly important in understanding rain forest

ecology, Struhsaker said, because in tropical rain forests, animals

are more important to the perpetuation of the trees and plants than in

temperate forests.

 

"In temperate regions many plants are pollinated by and have their

seeds dispersed by wind," he said, "whereas in tropical forests a much

higher proportion of these tasks are done by animals."

 

Understanding the full complexities of the tropical rain forests also

is critical given the importance of the tropical rain forests in the

planet's ecology, Struhsaker said. Although tropical rain forests

cover less than 10 percent of Earth's surface, they contain more than

50 percent of all species.

 

Struhsaker began his work in Kibale in 1970. At first, he and his

colleagues studied the many species of monkeys and apes in the area.

In 1976 the scientists expanded their work to include the effects of

logging on animals and the forest ecosystem as a whole. Overall, some

28 scientists contributed to the research over its 23 years. Also,

over the study's lifetime, the study expanded from a concentration on

basic research to include studies of logging as well as lobbying and

conservation efforts.

 

The study found that:

 

* Heavy logging severely reduced the diversity of species in the

logged areas.

* Even after decades, the forest - including both the animals and the

commercial timber species - had not recovered significantly.

* Logged forests had more and larger gaps and greater density of

thicket plants, which reduced the survival of tree seeds and

seedlings.

* The monkey species in logged areas still had lower densities of

social groups at least 18 years after logging. Such reduction in

social groups likely reduced genetic fitness of the populations.

Hunting of the primates was also made easier in the logged areas of

West and Central Africa.

* Rodent populations increased considerably in logged areas, because

of the increase in thicket growth. This population increase caused a

reduced survival of tree seeds and seedlings, because the rodents fed

on them, suppressing forest recovery.

* Elephants used heavily logged areas much more than lightly logged or

unlogged forest, further damaging young trees and suppressing forest

recovery.

 

The Kibale study convinced Struhsaker that it is impractical to manage

tropical forests to increase timber yield beyond that of a natural

forest or even to restore damaged ecosystems, while at the same time

maintaining viable populations of plant and animal species found in

old-growth forests. For one thing, he said, such management is

expensive and requires an investment in a project that may not yield

returns for 75 to 100 years.

 

These systems are so complicated, with so much natural variation in

them, that the impact of the harvest cannot be separated from the

natural variation until 20 years or more after the fact. In the

meantime, wrong management decisions are being made.

 

Attempting to rehabilitate habitats is incredibly expensive and not

likely to restore a complex ecosystem on a large scale, Struhsaker

concludes.

 

Struhsaker's observations of rain forest logging worldwide lead him to

believe that logging will accelerate, and with it the loss of tropical

rain forest.

 

"As timber resources around the world become depleted, more and more

species that are not considered valuable today will become valuable

tomorrow, and will be logged, he said. What's more, he said, timber

companies will move into new areas of untouched forest.

 

"Already, we know that the big timber companies in Indonesia and

Malaysia are moving to South America. They've finished the resources

in Southeast Asia and now they're moving on."

 

Struhsaker believes the only long-term solution to conserve forests in

developing countries is population control, energy conservation to

reduce wood use and strong forest management policies by stable

governments.

 

To achieve these ends, he advocates that U.S. foreign aid and

international development funds be predicated on a recipient nation's

commitment to achieve goals in these areas.

 

Struhsaker emphasizes that so-called developed nations, the principal

market for tropical woods, must reduce their own rates of consumption

of natural resources.

 

The Kibale research was funded by the National Science Foundation,

National Institutes of Health, New York Zoological Society, African

Wildlife Fund, World Wildlife Fund, National Geographic Society, U.S.

Embassy and the East African Wildlife Society. The researchers' local

sponsor was the Department of Zoology in Uganda's Makerere University.

The study was also officially supported by the Ugandan Government

Forest and Game Departments, the Ugandan National Research Council and

the President's Office.

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS###

This document is a PHOTOCOPY for educational and personal use only. 

Recipients should seek permission from the source for reprinting.  All

efforts are made to provide accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate

responsibility for verifying all information rests with the reader. 

Check out our Gaia Forest Conservation Archives at URL=  

http://forests.org/

Networked by Ecological Enterprises, gbarry@forests.org