***********************************************
PAPUA
NEW GUINEA RAINFOREST CAMPAIGN NEWS
Seven
Major Forestry Projects Ruled "Unviable"
***********************************************
Forest
Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises
http://forests.org/
2/21/97
OVERVIEW,
SOURCE & COMMENTARY by EE
In a
surprisingly good development, the forestry board has sent seven
large
proposed industrial forestry development projects "back to the
drawing
board." This was not because they
were grossly unsustainable,
ecologically
and socially damaging, exploitative with little local
benefit,
or because they were just plain bad development. Rather, it
is
because they were "unviable," meaning presumably somebody in power
is not
making enough money off the deal.
Nonetheless, despite my
cynicism,
these were bad projects and it is good news they are not
going
forward. Following is coverage from
_The Independent_ which
provides
additional details.
g.b.
LIST
NOTE
This
forest email list is a personal email list and not a list server.
All you
need to do to unsubscribe is send me a short email note at
gbarry@forests.org
*******************************
RELAYED
TEXT STARTS HERE:
Headline: Major forestry plans ruled unviable
Source: The Independent
Date: 2/14/97
Author: Harlyne Joku
SEVEN
major forestry project proposals promising millions of kina in
development
benefits to the landowners and investment in the country
have
been ruled unviable by the forestry board.
Proponents
for the projects have been told to take the proposals back
to the
drawing board and return with financially viable and realistic
figures.
The
projects include the controversial Hekiko project in the Gulf
province,
Josephstall in Madang, Amanab Block 3 and 4 in the West
Sepik
province, Asengseng FMA area in the West New Britain province,
Mukus
Tolo in the East New Britain province, Rottock Bay (West New
Britain)
and Semabo in the Western province.
Concerns
have been raised at a recent Forestry board meeting that the
proposal
for the Hekiko FMA by Hong Kong based Yeungs Group Enterprise
is
financially unrealistic. Profit and
loss projections, cash flow
statements
and debt servicing has not been provided, nor supportive
documents
presented. Concerns were further raised
that no Timber
Permit/Authority
was attached. Yeungs had also failed to
inform the
Provincial
Forest Management Committee about their plans.
Hekiko
has remained a controversial project area since 1995. On
February
7, 1995, Yeungs Group Enterprise (PNG) Pty Ltd and a
landowner
company known as the Hekiko Forests Pty Ltd signed a
Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) stating that the PNG government has
recognised
the principles of the landowners and the need to develop
the
Hekiko forest resources area.
The
Hekiko FMA is customary land located in the remote western part of
Kikori
river commencing from Kaiam No 1 village in the Gulf province,
the
Omati riverhead to Fogomaiyu village in the Southern Highlands
province.
The MOU
allows Yeungs to develop the land through clear felling, the
establishment
of facilities to process timber products, the marketing
of
logs, construction of infrastructure and the processing of various
timber
products. Yeungs have also proposed an
agro based industries
such as
Oil Palm industries in the project areas.
Forest
Minister Andrew Baing was asked during a press conference last
year
about the Hehiko proposal to which he responded he was not aware
of.
According
to forestry officials, unlike other proposals like
Josephstal
and Asengseng that had taken more than years to reach
official
recognition, Hekiko was rushed through up to board level in
less
than two years.
Proposals
for the other FMA's had similar concerns raised.
###RELAYED
TEXT ENDS###
This
document is a PHOTOCOPY for educational and personal use only.
Recipients
should seek permission from the source for reprinting. All
efforts
are made to provide accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate
responsibility
for verifying all information rests with the reader.
Check
out our Gaia Forest Conservation Archives at URL=
http://forests.org/
Networked
by Ecological Enterprises, gbarry@forests.org