***********************************************
WORLDWIDE
FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS
Fragmentation
of Tropical Forests Can Create "Genetic Bottleneck"
***********************************************
Forest
Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises
http://forests.org/
7/4/98
OVERVIEW
& COMMENTARY by EE
The
consequences of tropical ecosystem fragmentation and damage, to
both
ecological systems and constituent biodiversity, are far from
known. A University of Georgia study indicates the
disproportionate
manner
in which individuals trees left standing in pastures can
dominate
the reproduction in nearby remnant forests, "creating a
genetic
bottleneck." This indicates that
the genetic diversity of
seedlings
in forest fragment may be relatively small, with severe risk
of
inbreeding. Continued survival, particularly viability of
fragmented
tropical rainforest, is far more complex than previously
indicated
and may require new conservation strategies.
g.b.
*******************************
RELAYED
TEXT STARTS HERE:
Title: Fragmentation Of Tropical Forests Can
Create "Genetic
Bottleneck," According To New
University Of Georgia Study
Source: University of Georgia
Status: Distribute freely accredited to source
Date: July 2, 1998
Contact: Phil Williams
philwpio@arches.uga.edu
706-542-8501
University of Georgia
Contact: Jim Hamrick
hamrick@dogwood.botany.uga.edu
706-542-1826
University of Georgia
ATHENS,
Ga.--Tropical forests have been disappearing at alarming rates
for the
past three decades. Farmers, ranchers and timber industries
have
cut millions of acres, and only in the past few years has the
ecosystem
damage become clear.
A new
study by botanists at the University of Georgia now shows for
the
first time that trees left standing in pastures can actually
dominate
the reproduction in nearby remnant forests, creating a
"genetic
bottleneck." The research indicates that the survival of
tropical
forests could be far more complex than was known before and
that
new approaches to conservation strategies may be needed.
"The
key is to understand how much genetic movement there is between
fragments
of forest," said Dr. James Hamrick. "When we lose fragments
of
forest, we lose genetic diversity. Gene exchange between fragments
helps
to maintain this diversity."
The
study, by Hamrick and his graduate student Preston Aldrich, was
published
today in the journal Science.
Genetic
diversity is vital in both plant and animal communities.
Farmers
have, for hundreds of years, bred crop plants and farm animals
to
maintain a healthy diversity of what were, before the 20th century,
called
traits. Now, with advanced techniques to determine the exact
genetic
makeup of individuals, scientists understand considerably more
about
how genes drift through populations.
Aldrich
and Hamrick studied a tree species called Symphonia
globulifera
in a little-examined premontane rain forest area in
southern
Costa Rica. S. globulifera is a shade-tolerant canopy tree
with
bright red flowers that are pollinated primarily by hummingbirds.
Bats
disperse the seeds by eating fruits and then passing seeds on
through
guano at their resting sites. Like many areas in the tropics,
the
study area consisted of an area of fragmented forest with a number
of
large nearby members of the species standing alone in open pasture
land.
There were neither seedlings or saplings of S. globulifera in
the
pastures, suggesting poor habitat quality for germination and
growth.
The
question was simple: What trees are the parents of seedlings
growing
in the forest fragments? Finding the answer would have been
nearly
impossible even a decade ago until the invention of sensitive
techniques
that allow researchers to determine the exact genetic
makeup
of individual plants in an ecosystem. Even now, the problem is
daunting,
since there were more than 800 possible parent pairs.
"In
trying to tell who the parents are, we had to use the same
techniques
used in forensic analysis to determine a child's parents,"
said
Hamrick. "We were able to do this only because Preston was able
to
develop the techniques for our specific genetic analysis himself."
The
breakthrough came in using segments of DNA called microsatellites
as
specific markers for S. globulifera. These markers allowed Aldrich
and
Hamrick to determine the pedigree for a number of seedlings and
saplings
in a one hectare forest fragment on their 38.5- hectare
research
area. (A hectare is a metric unit of area equal to 2.471
acres.)
The scientists knew the genetic composition of all the adults,
42
individuals, in the study area. The results of the genetic analysis
were
startling. Out of nearly 250 seedlings studied from a single
forest
fragment, some 68 percent were produced by adults in pastures -
- not
from adults within the fragments themselves. Moreover, of the
seedling
produced by pasture trees, 77 percent came from only two
trees.
Adults left in the fragment produced less than 5 percent of the
seedlings
in their own patches. The importance of the discovery lies
in the
fact that the genetic diversity of seedlings in forest fragment
may be
relatively small indeed. "If you looked at the number of
seedlings
superficially, you might say that this is a healthy rate of
regrowth,"
said Hamrick. "But in truth, the effect is ecologically
unhealthy
due to the potential for inbreeding in subsequent
generations."
As humans know, inbreeding can expose deleterious genes.
The
scientists have several theories why the pasture trees have
such an
overwhelming impact on gene flow. First, there is little
competition
for the pasture trees for sunlight and nutrients,
giving
them superior abilities to flower and fruit. Second, the
abundance
of flowers may attract more hummingbirds for
pollination.
Finally, bats have easy pickings of the fruit and
take
them from the pasture trees to the forest fragment, where
they
eat and then pass seeds back to soil in guano.
The
study has important implications for conservation and forest
restoration.
And it shows that the impact of deforestation has
been
far more devastating that the simple removal of individual
trees.
At least in this species of tree, fragmentation has
resulted
in the possibility of a serious loss of genetic
diversity
in this test area.
Thus,
areas that look healthy in terms of regrowth may not be
healthy
at all over the long term. They may be facing serious
future
problems due to problems with genetic drift and
inbreeding.
American farmers already know of the problems this
can
cause, since they barely avoided a near-disaster because of
over-planting
of corn with too little genetic diversity in the
1970s.
Still,
scientists say it is beginning to become apparent that it
will be
difficult to make any kind of blanket statements about
gene
movement among populations of forest species. Indeed,
botanists
say we are now only beginning to understand what
happens
to genetic diversity in natural populations over
time--and
why.
"One
of the important things this study has shown us is that the
superficial
appearance of an area might not be telling you the
whole
story," said Hamrick. "Each situation has unique
characteristics
that make if very difficult to say that tropical
trees
in a certain situation will behave this way or that. Quite
simply,
our study area looked healthy, but it wasn't."
Written
by Phil Williams.
Editors/Writers:
James Hamrick will be out of the country until
Monday,
July 6. He may be reached at the above phone number at
that
time.
###RELAYED
TEXT ENDS###
This
document is for general distribution.
All efforts are made to
provide
accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate responsibility for
verifying
all information rests with the reader.
Check out our Gaia
Forest
Conservation Archives at URL= http://forests.org/
Networked
by Ecological Enterprises, gbarry@forests.org