***********************************************
WORLDWIDE
FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS
Brazil
Quiet as Evidence of Amazon's Demise Mounts
***********************************************
Forest
Networking a Project of Ecological Enterprises
http://forests.org/
1/22/98
OVERVIEW,
SOURCE & COMMENTARY by EE
The
following Associated Press article synthesizes recent reports
regarding
significant new evidence that the Amazon is greatly
threatened. As with every preceding wilderness that was
thought to be
endless
and incapable of ever being lost through over-exploitation,
the
Amazon is poised to begin an inexorable downward spiral. The
global
community must confront immediately the poverty, non-
sustainable
land uses (including industrial logging and agriculture),
and
ecological ignorance that threatens this critical planetary
ecosystem
engine. Organize, resist and advocate
for preservation of
the
Amazon!
g.b.
*******************************
RELAYED
TEXT STARTS HERE:
Title: Brazil quiet as evidence of Amazon's
demise mounts
Source: Associated Press via The Detroit News
Status: Copyrighted, contact source to reprint
Date: Monday, December 15, 1997
Byline: Michael Astor
RIO DE
JANEIRO -- No one disputes that the Amazon rain forest is
shrinking,
but just how fast it's disappearing is a mystery -- and a
political
hot potato in Brazil.
A new
report by a congressional committee investigating foreign
logging
companies says the Amazon is vanishing at a rate of 20,000
square
miles a year.
That's
more than three times the rate of 1994, the last year for which
official
figures are available.
About
12 percent of the 2 million-square-mile wilderness is gone.
Scientists
say the loss -- mainly from wildfires and logging -- adds
to the
greenhouse effect that is believed to cause global warming.
"If
nothing is done, the entire Amazon will be gone within 50 years,"
said
the 110-page report's author, Rep. Gilney Vianna of the leftist
Worker's
Party in the Amazon state of Mato Grosso.
Although
the numbers are only estimates, it's hard for the government
to
refute them without figures of its own. That's another problem,
because
the official numbers have been under wraps for nearly three
years.
The
government had promised to release its figures Dec. 1. They were
withheld
after Eduardo Martins, president of Brazil's Environmental
Protection
Agency, asked for more data on the average size of
deforested
areas and the types of vegetation affected.
"The
rate of deforestation is only good for a headline but does
nothing
to resolve the problem," said Martins. "I wanted to look at
the
causes."
Vianna
and several leading environmentalists say the release was
delayed
to avoid potential embarrassment for Brazil at the
international
conference on greenhouse gas emissions in Kyoto,
Japan.
Martins
denied it, but he admitted the government's numbers will show
that
Amazon destruction is on the rise.
He said
figures on western Rondonia state reflect the deforestation
trend
across the Amazon: deforestation rose sharply in 1995 before
leveling
off slightly in 1996 and 1997.
Determining
the extent of deforestation is the job of the government's
National
Space Research Institute.
At its
headquarters in Sao Jose dos Campos, 190 miles southwest of
Rio,
120 analysts have spent the last five months toiling over photos
from
NASA's Landsat-TM satellite showing deforestation from 1995 to
1997.
In
1994, 80 percent of Amazon deforestation was revealed in 38 of the
229
satellite images that cover the Brazilian Amazon.
This
year, the number of images that captured the same percentage of
deforestation
climbed to 47, said Ulf Walter Palme, the project's
technical
director.
The
increase means the area of destruction has expanded since then by
122,544
square miles -- an area roughly the size of Italy.
The
government relies solely on satellite images in compiling its
figures.
Vianna's report arrives at substantially higher figures by
including
estimates on the cutting of lots smaller than the 16-acre
minimum
measurable by the satellite photos.
Vianna
has called for a 10-year moratorium on cutting and burning in
the
Amazon.
"We
need the moratorium because the government has no coherent policy
in the
Amazon," he said.
"Seventy
percent of the burnings are authorized by the government and
so is
the vast majority of the deforestation."
###RELAYED
TEXT ENDS###
This
document is a PHOTOCOPY for educational, personal and non-
commercial
use only. Recipients should seek
permission from the
source
for reprinting. All efforts are made to
provide accurate,
timely
pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all
information
rests with the reader. Check out our
Gaia Forest
Conservation
Archives at URL= http://forests.org/
Networked
by Ecological Enterprises, gbarry@forests.org