ACTION
ALERT
***********************************************
WORLDWIDE
FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS
Action
Needed to Protect Nicaragua's Imperiled Forests
***********************************************
Forest
Networking a Project of forests.org
http://forests.org/ -- Forest
Conservation Archives
http://forests.org/web/ -- Discuss Forest
Conservation
9/12/99
OVERVIEW
& COMMENTARY by EE
Between
1950 and 1990 Nicaragua's "forest cover was reduced by half,
and
today deforestation is spiraling out of control." Despite this,
the
largest intact rainforests in Central America still have a chance
if the
bloody world gets its priorities together, and provides the
means
to conserve them for local, regional and global benefits.
Respond
to this action alert and it may make a difference. The piece
also
provides a good backgrounder and update on the forest
conservation
situation in Nicaragua.
g.b.
*******************************
RELAYED
TEXT STARTS HERE:
Title: Action Needed to Help Protect Nicaragua's
Imperiled Forests
Source: Nicaragua Network
For more information, contact at
nicanet@igc.org
or (202) 544-5355
Status: Distribute freely with credit given to
source
Date: September 10, 1999
A Special
Alert from the Environmental Task Force of the Nicaragua
Network
President
Arnoldo Aleman's recent decision to cancel the moratorium
on the
cutting and exporting of mahogany and other threatened
tropical
hardwood species has been cause for great alarm among
Nicaraguan
environmentalists. Your letters are urgently needed to
encourage
the protection of Nicaragua's threatened forests.
Background
The
fate of Nicaragua's people and its forests are inextricably
intertwined.
Although deforestation is not often prioritized as an
urgent
social issue, its results include climatic changes, droughts,
drinking
water shortages, crop losses and malnutrition, soil erosion,
flooding,
sedimentation that destroys marine resources, fuelwood
shortages,
and ultimately, increased poverty and potential for
military
conflicts. These connections were made
painfully clear
during
Hurricane Mitch, when landslides on the deforested slopes of
Nicaragua
and Honduras led to great losses of crops, fertile soils,
and
human life.
Despite
rampant deforestation in recent decades, Nicaragua still
retains
the largest extent of rainforest in any of the Central
American
nations. This rainforest supports an incredible amount of
biological
diversity, and includes some of Central America's best
remaining
habitat for tapir, jaguar and four other cat species, three
types
of monkeys, peccaries, agoutis, pacas, anteaters, sloths, and a
great
variety of birds. Nicaragua's rainforest also contains the most
coveted
of Central America's endangered precious hardwoods, including
mahogany
and royal cedar.
Yet
Nicaragua's forest cover is being diminished at an alarming rate.
Between
1950 and 1990 the nation's forest cover was reduced by half,
and today
deforestation is spiraling out of control. Even Nicaragua's
largest
natural areas, the BOSAWAS Biosphere Reserve and the Indio-
Maiz
Biological Reserve, are threatened by illegal logging. The claim
is
frequently cited that if current rates of deforestation are
allowed
to continue, Nicaragua's remaining broadleaf forests will be
all but
gone within ten to twenty years. Ten to twenty years.
Responding
to Nicaragua's rapid deforestation, in 1997 President
Aleman
instituted a ban on the export of the nation's most lucrative
timber
species, the precious hardwoods mahogany, royal cedar, and
pochote.
In 1998 this ban was extended to include not just the
export,
but also the overall cutting of the precious hardwoods for a
period
of at least five years. At the time, critics questioned the
logic
of the ban, considering that it was being initiated at the same
time
that cuts in government spending on environmental enforcement
would
render the ban difficult to enforce.
As
predicted, the logging moratorium has been poorly enforced and
highly
ineffective. In fact, illegal logging has only become more
widespread
since the ban was instituted. This August, in response to
widespread
criticism for the government's inability to control
deforestation,
President Aleman unilaterally cancelled the ban on
cutting
and exporting the endangered tree species, and is instead
attempting
to impose a 7.5% tax on the trade in precious woods. Many
observers
claim that the problem was not with the ban itself, but
with
its lack of enforcement, and that the ban's cancellation will
only
accelerate the destruction of Nicaragua's remaining forests.
Rather
than curtailing deforestation, the new tax is likely to be
passed
along to landowners by timber exporters, or to result in
expanded
logging operations in order to make up for profits lost to
the
tax. In addition, the new tax on precious woods is being
challenged
as unconstitutional, on the basis that the President
failed
to obtain approval from the National Assembly.
The
Prize: Mahogany
Mahogany
is one of the tallest trees in the Nicaraguan rainforest,
its
umbrella-shaped crown reaching to over 200 feet high and emerging
above
the surrounding canopy. Use of mahogany dates back to pre-
Columbian
times, when indigenous peoples of the Americas used the
durable
and beautiful wood for dugout canoes. European ship builders
and
cabinet makers quickly discovered the virtues of trees in the
mahogany
family, and up to the present day the most important of
Nicaragua's
timber exports are mahogany (caoba) and royal cedar
(cedro
royal). Throughout its natural range, from Mexico to Brazil
and
Bolivia, mahogany has been highly exploited, and today the
species
is threatened not only by outright elimination, but also by
genetic
degradation, after centuries of having the largest most
robust
individuals harvested. In addition, as with many tropical
trees,
mahogany occurs at a very low density in the rainforest, with
mature
trees rarely averaging more than one per hectare (one hectare
is 100
meters by 100 meters, or about 2.5 acres). Mahogany also has a
low
rate of natural regeneration, requiring from 60-100 years to
reach
commercial maturity, and has been highly susceptible to pests
when
cultivated in plantations.
But
this goes beyond mahogany.
Since
mahogany and related precious woods are the main impetus behind
most
tropical logging operations, the controversy about the
moratorium
and its cancellation extends in significance far beyond
the
potential extinction of a few more tropical rainforest species.
Nearly
all mahogany is harvested from intact old-growth forests, and
even
though logging companies espouse the rhetoric that their logging
is
highly selective and leaves the rest of the forest unharmed, this
is not
the case. Not only does the removal of a forest's mature
mahogany
trees eliminate the seed sources necessary for the species'
regeneration,
but logging operations leave behind the seed of
destruction
for the remaining forest - roads. Much of the
colonization
of rainforest by agriculturalists and ranchers is
facilitated
by the transportation arteries carved out by mechanized
logging
operations. Thus the exploitation of one species can lead to
the
extinction of untold numbers of other species. Logging companies
also
often build sawmills that encourage cutting of other species
after
the precious woods are gone, and initiate an unsustainable
cycle
of short-term economic orientation that ultimately leaves a
region
impoverished. Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast has a long history of
this
type of boom-and-bust economic activity. The bulk of the Coast's
rich
resources have been exported, with little lasting benefit to the
region's
communities.
Since
most of Nicaragua's remaining natural forest lies within
indigenous
territories of the Miskito, Mayangna, and Rama, the
mahogany
ban is also an indigenous rights issue. Although the
region's
indigenous communities have historically practiced communal
rather
than private land ownership, most communities have never been
granted
official titles to their lands. In the absence of these
titles,
the central government has often treated the communal lands
as
"national land" and granted resource extraction concessions to
foreign
companies. (An example of this was the huge logging
concession
granted to the Korean company SOLCARSA that was opposed by
the
Nicaragua Network's Environmental Task Force and other
organizations
and eventually terminated in 1998.) In the wake of the
controversy
surrounding the SOLCARSA concession and others, the
government
has been reluctant to grant concessions, and logging has
been
proceeding along other lines. Yet the lack of land demarcation
and
titling remains the issue of foremost concern for Nicaragua's
indigenous
communities and until resolved will be potentially
explosive.
The ban
in practice: A "lumber Mafia"
As was
predicted, the logging moratorium was hampered by a lack of
enforcement
and served only to increase large-scale corruption and
the
development of a "lumber Mafia" that is currently operating
within
Nicaragua.
In
addition to the shortage of MARENA (Nicaragua's environmental
ministry)
officials available to enforce the logging moratorium, the
fine
established for extraction of the precious hardwoods was so low
that
illegal logging remained quite lucrative. While the fine for
cutting
the hardwoods was set at $40 per cubic meter of wood, the
woods
can sell for more than $400 per cubic meter on the
international
market. As a result, the absurd situation was created
in
which not only did the illegal trade remain profitable, but some
loggers
even paid the $40 per cubic meter fines to MARENA officials
up-front,
before the cutting commenced. As the salaries of MARENA
staff
are so low, these quasi-legal activities provided them with a
clear
financial incentive.
In
light of the allegation that during the ban's short life
government
officials actually gave permission to several companies to
export
the precious woods, the moratorium's failure was especially
predictable.
According to the Nicaraguan NGO Centro Humboldt, 96
businesses
have been "legally" exploiting the precious woods,
including
35 companies involved in exports. The largest of these
companies
is said to be the Dominican company, MADENSA, which has
reportedly
been "logging indiscriminately" on indigenous lands along
the Rio
Prinzapolka and elsewhere, and exporting millions of dollars
of
mahogany annually.
Another
mode under which the lumber Mafia is reported to operate is
by
simple intimidation and theft of lumber, especially from the
communal
lands of indigenous people. As described in a 1999 newspaper
account,
loggers will often trespass on the lands of others with "a
chainsaw
in one hand and an AK-47 rifle in the other". The widespread
poverty
and lack of enforcement has created an atmosphere of
lawlessness,
in which those with the most guns prevail.
Unfortunately,
illegal logging is becoming more prevalent on
Nicaragua's
Atlantic Coast. Given the complications that have made it
more
difficult for logging companies to receive legal forestry
concessions,
such as unresolved indigenous land claims and opposition
by
environmental organizations, many logging operations are simply
evading
the law. The result of these trends is that
logging activity
in the
Atlantic Coast region is widespread, largely unrecorded, and
simply
out of control. The situation in Nicaragua's forests could
easily
escalate to the level of Brazil's forests, where members of
several
indigenous groups such as the Ticuna Indians have been killed
for
confronting lumber pirates.
What
can be done?
The
threats to Nicaragua's forests are complex, abundant, and as
previously
described, urgent. To truly address these problems will
require
concerted effort on a variety of levels, including promotion
of
economic alternatives to deforestation (both in Nicaragua and in
the
U.S.), reform of the global economic order (combating initiatives
such as
the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas and the WTO's
proposed
"global free logging agreement"), and extensive
reforestation.
In the immediate sense, letters are needed in response
to the
current crises facing Nicaragua's forests and the cancellation
of the
ban on logging mahogany and other precious woods.
Letters
should address the following points:
1. The need to settle indigenous land
demarcation and promote
sustainable
resource management. Both the World Bank and Nicaragua's
central
government need to be pressured by the international
solidarity
and environmental movements into enacting a land
demarcation
and titling process that reflects the interests of
Nicaragua's
indigenous peoples and forests. Beyond land demarcation
and
titling, Nicaragua's indigenous peoples will need long-term
technical
and economic assistance in sustainable resource management.
Decades
of imperialism, war, isolation, and natural disasters have
left
indigenous communities among the poorest in all of Nicaragua.
Even if
land titles are secured, unless indigenous communities are
provided
with technical assistance, access to markets, and financial
incentives
to protect forests, there is a great risk that the
familiar
pattern of unsustainable plunder of natural resources for
short-term
survival will prevail.
2. The need to reinstate the logging ban, but
with effective
enforcement
this time. The Nicaraguan government and lending and
development
agencies need to financially support a commitment to
enforcing
the logging ban. As long as "austerity measures" aimed at
shrinking
the public sector result in weakened environmental
monitoring
and enforcement, the destruction of Nicaragua's forests
will
continue unchecked. The logging ban should stay in place until
indigenous
land demarcation has been resolved, so that indigenous
communities
can truly control the use of resources on their
traditional
lands. Certain types of international aid should be
contingent
on the Nicaraguan government's demonstrated commitment to
resolve
land demarcation issues and enforce forestry regulations.
3. The need to create a workable forest policy,
with input from
civil society.
A sustainable forestry policy is needed that is based
on
input from NGOs, community and indigenous organizations, and all
other
parties that have a role in the forest industry. Any policy
that
ignores these players is unlikely to succeed. The only
sustainable
forest policy for Nicaragua will be one that prioritizes
local
control over control by large corporations, especially those
that
are foreign-owned.
Copy
this letter or write a letter in your own words and send it to
President
Aleman either by airmail or by fax. Put
$1.00 postage on
your
letter if it weighs one ounce.
President
Arnoldo Aleman
Casa
Presidencial
Avenida
Bolivar
Managua,
Nicaragua
Fax:
011 (505) 228-7911
Dear
President Aleman,
I am
deeply concerned about your recent decision to cancel the
moratorium
on the logging and export of mahogany and other precious
woods.
Although I know that the logging ban was ineffective, I fear
that
the ban's cancellation at this point will only accelerate the
destruction
of Nicaragua's forests. In the absence of any sustainable
forestry
policy or effective enforcement of existing laws,
cancellation
of the ban will likely have negative effects such as
depleting
Nicaragua's rich biological diversity, violating indigenous
rights
to control of natural resources, and exacerbating the existing
problems
of land degradation and rural poverty.
Apparently
the recent increase in Nicaragua's uncontrolled illegal
logging
has been due not to the moratorium itself, but to blatant
corruption
and the lack of effective enforcement. In light of the
recent
reports in the Nicaraguan press that the central government
has
been granting permission to several logging companies to cut and
export
the very hardwoods that have been banned, it is no surprise
that
the moratorium has not been working. The lack of resources
devoted
to training and employing a sufficient number of forest
guards,
and to earnestly enforcing a strict code of ethics amongst
these
guards is also certainly a factor in the ban's failure up to
now.
As a
concerned citizen of planet Earth, I encourage you to reinstate
the ban
on the logging and export of mahogany and other precious
woods,
but to truly enforce the law. The ban should be kept in place
and
strictly enforced at least until the matters of indigenous land
demarcation
are satisfactorily settled. The Autonomy Law and
Nicaraguan
constitution recognize the rights of the nation's
indigenous
communities to communal land ownership and natural
resource
use. The central government's procrastination on the
issuance
of communal land titles, while simultaneously permitting
illegal
logging on traditional indigenous lands is a violation of
both
the nation's environmental regulations and basic human rights.
I
encourage you further to accept the offers of civil society to work
together
with the Nicaraguan government to design and implement a
truly
sustainable forest policy. Any sound long-term policy would be
oriented
toward maximizing the value placed on living forests in
Nicaragua.
This might include carbon-offset programs and programs
that
provide incentives for small enterprises such as furniture
making
that add value to forest products before they are shipped
abroad.
These approaches stand in sharp contrast with the current
irrational
policy that allows foreign owned companies such as MADENSA
to
indiscriminately exploit and export the nation's biological
riches.
As a
citizen of the United States, I am also imploring my own
government
and international lending agencies to provide assistance
to
Nicaragua that will allow for better enforcement of environmental
standards
at all levels of government. Furthermore, I am requesting
that
the lending institutions and development agencies limit funding
for
Nicaragua until your central government demonstrates a sincere
commitment
to protecting the nation's forests and indigenous rights.
It is
my hope that the people of Nicaragua and other nations can work
together
in order to both improve the living standards of the
Nicaraguan
people and to protect the nation's remaining forests.
Sincerely,
###RELAYED
TEXT ENDS###
This
document is for general distribution.
All efforts are made to
provide
accurate, timely pieces; though ultimate responsibility for
verifying
all information rests with the reader.
Check out our
Gaia's
Forest Conservation Archives & Portal at URL=
http://forests.org/
Networked
by forests.org, gbarry@forests.org