***********************************************
WORLDWIDE
FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS
Amazon
Being Logged for Plywood, Protests Mount
***********************************************
Forest Networking a Project of Forests.org
http://forests.org/ -- Forest
Conservation Archives
http://forests.org/web/ -- Discuss Forest
Conservation
06/22/00
OVERVIEW
& COMMENTARY
The
World's rainforests are being dismantled to provide plywood to
build
our homes. Following is information
regarding how Great
Britain
is being compelled to come to terms with its complicity in
rainforest
destruction (though BBC misquotes cumulative Amazon
deforestation),
how protests are being mounted by Greenpeace against
Malaysian
company's export of plywood from the Amazon to Great
Britain,
and further information regarding the recent report on
multi-national
loggers zeroing in on remaining rainforest
wildernesses
(full report at
http://panda.org/news/download/tnc_report.pdf
). It is within our
power
to stop this madness and preserve the Earth's essential
ecosystems. We must all mobilize and organize to resist
and stop
criminal
rainforest obliteration. Our, the
Planet's, and many other
species'
survival depend upon it.
g.b.
*******************************
RELAYED
TEXT STARTS HERE:
ITEM #1
Title: Amazon felled for British plywood
A quarter of the Amazon forest has already
disappeared
Source: Copyright 2000, BBC News Online
Date: June 20, 2000
By: Robert Pigott, environment correspondent
You
might not guess it flying west from Manaus in a small plane but
the
mighty Amazon forest is in jeopardy. Thirty years ago only one
percent
of the Amazon forest had been cut down. Today a quarter has
disappeared.
Now
previously untouched areas in the very heart of the forest are
being
felled, and, as elsewhere, most of the logging is illegal.
The
logging takes place during the dry season, which has just begun.
Later
in the year when the rains come and the floodwater rises the
logs
are floated out of the forests and down the rivers to saw mills,
many of
them in Amazonia's biggest city, Manaus.
I came
across a raft of 120 or so illegally cut logs hidden in a
secluded
inlet on the Jurua River.
Milton
Casara, head of the Brazilian Environment Agency in Amazonas
state
confirmed that they were illegally logged. He says well over
half
the wood logged in the state is illegal.
Anonymous
middlemen approach the poorest villagers who live along the
region's
rivers and offer them pitifully small amounts of money to
pick
out the biggest trees.
"The
exploitation of local populations is increasing", he says, "and
its
leading to a greater degree of poverty here. It's a fundamentally
unjust
relationship...I would even describe it as inhuman".
Sergio
Lauria, the State Prosecutor for Manuas, says even catching the
dealers
who buy the illegal wood will not solve the problem.
"By
attacking these middle men there is no way that we are getting to
the
crux of the problem," he says.
"You
could compare this to drug trafficking for example. Tackling the
dealers
will never eradicate the problem of drug trafficking."
This is
not just a question of law enforcement, but a political
battle.
The big
logging companies are pressing for permission to exploit the
forest
here in the previously untouched heart of the Amazon. Ranged
against
them are environment groups like Greenpeace, and indigenous
people
such as the Deni.
The
Deni, who live in a village on the Xerua River, oppose plans by a
large
timber company, WTK, to log land it has bought nearby. They rely
utterly
on the forest and say their hunter-gatherer way of life would
be
destroyed by proximity to the logging.
WTK's
subsidiary Amaplac is among the companies in Manaus turning
Amazon
timber into plywood, although there's no evidence the company
is
involved in any illegal trade. Amaplac exports much of the plywood
going
to Britain, which arrives in regular shipments at Tilbury docks.
From
here it is delivered to builders' yards, like the one in London
where I
bought a sheet of Amaplac plywood for œ15 ($23). It's hard,
waterproof
and not too expensive and is used for things like boxing in
pipework
and laying concrete. Hardly glamorous end uses for some of
the
world's most precious forests.
The
destination of the wood increases the pain felt by people like
Paulo
Adario, Greenpeace's Amazon campaigner. He points out that the
tropical
rain forests are thought to contain more than half of all
species.
"In
just one hectare here we have 500 species of trees," says Mr
Adario.
"In
Europe you can count maybe five or six. It's incredible, the
biodiversity
here is really something, and we are destroying it
without
giving ourselves time to learn what we are destroying."
Greenpeace
reserves much of its criticism for the richer
industrialised
countries, like the UK, which it believes are guilty of
wilful
inaction. The G8 group of industrial nations agreed at a summit
in
Denver three years ago to support what it called a practical action
plan.
It
includes "building capacity for sustainable forest management", and
"eliminating
illegal logging". Another summit the following year,
confirmed
the plan, but Greenpeace claims nothing has happened.
The government
says little of the timber exported to Britain was
illegally
logged. Greenpeace questions whether the UK can be getting
only
the 40% of timber from Amazonas that was legally felled.
Meanwhile
campaigners are appealing to the wood buying public to
consider
themselves.
ITEM #2
Title: GREENPEACE VOLUNTEERS BOARD SHIP TO STOP
CRIMINAL TIMBER
IMPORTS AND PROTECT THE AMAZON RAINFOREST
Source: Copyright 2000 Greenpeace
Date: June 20, 2000
LONDON
-- Six Greenpeace volunteers boarded the MV Enif today to stop
criminal
imports of wood from the Amazon rainforest. The volunteers
attached
themselves to the bow of the ship in the Thames Estuary,
north
of Sheerness, to prevent it from unloading at London's Tilbury
Docks.
Greenpeace has asked the ship's captain to return the criminal
timber
to Brazil. The MV Enif left the Amazon on May 20th.
The
Brazilian Government has said that 80% of all wood logged in the
Amazon
is taken illegally. WTK, the Malaysian multinational behind
these
timber imports is one of the world's biggest rainforest
destroyers.
The company has numerous convictions, along with its third
party
log suppliers, for trading in illegal logs from the Amazon. WTK
is also
threatening to log on land belonging to Amazon Indians.
One of
the volunteers, Eduardo Quartim from Greenpeace Brazil, who is
attached
to ship's mast said, "The unique Amazon rainforest is being
destroyed
by illegal and destructive logging. A lot of it ends up as
cheap
plywood on building sites in the UK. Yet few British people know
this.
We must all protect this ancient rainforest and the plants and
animals
that live in it before it's too late. We must stop these
criminal
timber imports."
British
Prime Minister Tony Blair has promised that the UK will tackle
illegal
logging domestically and will encourage the other big
industrialised
countries to do the same (1). He has so far failed to
act.
Every month up to 1400 tonnes of plywood from the Amazon ends up
in the
UK.
John
Sauven, Greenpeace forest campaign director said, "Tony Blair has
promised
action to protect the world's remaining ancient forests. Yet
every
month chunks of the Amazon rainforest are still coming up the
Thames
into Tilbury. If Tony Blair won't end the UK's role in Amazon
destruction
then Greenpeace will."
Nearly
80% of the world's ancient forest has already been destroyed or
degraded.
The remainder is disappearing at the rate of 10 million
hectares
every year - that's an area the size of a football pitch
every
two seconds. One seventh of the Amazon, an area the size of
France,
has already been lost.
A
Greenpeace investigation in May and June in the area of the Amazon
where
WTK get their logs, uncovered several illegal log rafts. These
logs
included the increasingly rare Samauma tree, known locally as the
'Queen
of the Forest' because it towers above its neighbours, reaching
30
metres in height and 3 metres in diameter".
Notes
to Editors
(1) In
a letter to Greenpeace dated 26th May 2000, Tony Blair said,
"As
you know, a report on the implementation of the G8 Action
Programme
on Forests will be considered in July. The UK will continue
its
efforts to tackle illegal logging, domestically, bilaterally and
multilaterally
and will encourage our G8 partners to do the same."
This
letter is available from the Greenpeace Press Office.
-
Greenpeace letter to Tony Blair (20/6/2000) calling on him to act on
his
promises to stop the trade in illegal and destructive timber
products
available from the Greenpeace Press Office
-
Greenpeace letter to buyers of WTK (Amaplac) plywood (20/6/2000) in
the UK
available from the Greenpeace Press Office.
-
Background briefing, 'Protect the Amazon - Stop Criminal Timber
Imports'
available from the Greenpeace Press Office.
ITEM #3
Title: ENVIRONMENT: New Forest Report Blasts Asian
Companies
Source: Copyright 2000 InterPress Service, all
rights reserved.
Date: June 13, 2000
By: Danielle Knight
WASHINGTON,
Jun 13 (IPS) - Increased timber extraction investments by
multinational
logging companies based in Asia is an increasing cause
of
destruction of tropical forests in Africa, the Caribbean and
Pacific
countries, according to a new report released this month.
Compiled
by two large environmental organisations, World Wildlife Fund
(WWF)
and the Washington-based World Resources Institute (WRI), the
report
shows how investment, formerly led by companies from Japan,
Europe
and North America, has shifted to Asian firms, mainly from
Malaysia,
Indonesia, Korea, and Hong Kong. The
report was funded by
the
European Commission (EC).
This
new trend, says the study, has resulted in an expansion of
destructive
logging operations, violation of indigenous rights, and
sometimes
large-scale corruption.
The
authors of the report say they are so disturbed by the findings
that
they are recommending a moratorium on all logging in 11 countries
-
Cameroon, Gabon, Congo-Brazzaville, the Central African Republic,
Equatorial
Guinea and the Democratic Republic of Congo in central
Africa,
Belize, Suriname, and Guyana in the Caribbean rim; and Papua
New
Guinea and the Solomon Islands in the South Pacific rim.
''As
the operations take place in countries with little or no
enforcement
of forest management requirements, the logging itself is
often
very careless, with high collateral damage to the surrounding
forest,''
says the report.
In
addition to criticising logging companies, it also takes aim at the
International
Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Union, the United
States
and the United Kingdom.
It
urges the World Bank and EC to support only logging activities
certified
as coming from ecologically or sustainably managed forests.
''Most
of the new investment focuses on short term activities, and the
economic
benefits to the exporting country are usually very low,''
says
Jean-Paul Jeanrenaud, head of WWF's forest programme.
The
report was originally supposed to be published in 1997, but WWF
and the
EC halted the release because they were concerned that
multinational
Asian companies and governments accused of corruption
identified
in the report would take legal action against them. WWF,
based
in Gland, Switzerland, explained to the press that the
considerable
delay was caused by the need to undertake further
research
to ensure that the report is as accurate as possible.
The
postponed release ''has been necessary in order to bring the
report
up to date following the Asian economic crisis and to minimise
the
threat of litigation from some of the world's most powerful
transnational
companies whose trade practices are examined in this
report,''
says a statement by WWF.
The
main difference between the two versions of the report is that the
final
draft of the report does not name specific companies, whereas
the
original draft - obtained by IPS - did.
Nigel
Sizer, one of the main authors of the report, says he stands by
the
original draft as completely accurate and has made copies
available
to the press.
He told
reporters that lack of accuracy was not the reason the report
was
withheld. While company names were omitted from the final
published
report, it still contains the same key conclusions and
recommendations.
''Groups
that are working on such sensitive issues, whether they are
NGOs
(non-governmental organisations), funding agencies, or
governments,
should fully understand the implications of the work that
they
are doing and carefully think through any issues that may
arise,''
Sizer told IPS.
Both
versions of the report acknowledge that Malaysian investment
accounts
for more than 80 percent of the new investment by Asian
logging
firms in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific.
The
original draft is largely critical of one particular Malaysian
company,
Rimbunan Hijau, which the report says is ''also the one with
the
most questionable track record in terms of environmental and
social
responsibility.''
Even
though new investment from Asia is increasing, both versions of
the
report remind readers that European companies continue to play a
dominant
role in logging activities in Africa.
But
there are some important differences between earlier waves of
investment
and the new so-called 'South-South' investments, says the
report.
Investments
by Asian firms are ''growing very quickly, many proposals
are
very large scale, they are utilising a wider range of species, and
in some
cases are cutting smaller diameter trees for the less
discriminating
Asian market,'' say both versions of the report.
The new
investments have been concentrated in countries with generally
weak or
outdated environmental and social laws and little enforcement
capacity,
says the report.
''Lack
of good governance is a key part of the problem,'' says the
report.
In a
majority of the countries studied, decision making is
''controlled
by a small groups of powerful people or clans within the
government
that look at the primary forests of their country as a
short-term
source of personal revenue.''
Forest
conservation programmes promoted by donors (including the World
Bank,
Japan, the EC, France, Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands,
Canada,
and the United States) have not been linked to efforts to
achieve
good governance, says the report.
''Many
of these initiatives are poorly co-ordinated and often simply
fail
due to a lack of real commitment from the recipient countries, as
well as
conflicting donor policies and competing political
interests,''
says the report.
One of
the main areas of policy discord is in the design and
implementation
of structural adjustment programmes promoted by the
World
Bank and IMF.
While
these programmes seek to increase natural resource extraction
and
liberalise laws restricting foreign investment, they do not
equally
promote strengthening the capacity to control and plan the
activities
to reduce environmental and social impacts, it says.
The
report urges all African, Caribbean and Pacific nations to freeze
all new
foreign investment for the expansion of logging operations
until
land use planning has been completed and the traditional rights
of
local people have been defined.
These
countries should look for guidance from the Forest Stewardship
Council
(FSC), which independently certifies wood that is harvested in
ways
that do not harm the forest, it says.
''Governments
and investors which commit to sound forest management
and
independent certification recognised by the FSC should receive
special
assistance from donors to help the shift from non-management
to
sustainability,'' says Xavier Ortega with WWF's offices in Belgium.
(END/IPS/EN/dk/da/00)
###RELAYED
TEXT ENDS###
This
document is a PHOTOCOPY for educational, personal and non-
commercial
use only. Recipients should seek
permission from the
source
for reprinting. All efforts are made to
provide accurate,
timely
pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all
information
rests with the reader. Check out our
Gaia's Forest
Conservation
Archives & Portal at URL= http://forests.org/
Networked
by Forests.org, Inc., gbarry@forests.org