***********************************************

WORLDWIDE FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS

Battle Over Forest Certification Standards

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Forests.org

     http://forests.org/ -- Forest Conservation Archives

      http://forests.org/web/ -- Discuss Forest Conservation

 

04/23/00

OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY

As corporate and other consumers of timber are turning to "certified"

timber and forest products, the term is in danger of being usurped

and made meaningless, much like its predecessor "sustainable". 

Industrial scale logging that does not strive for ecological

sustainability, however good the rhetoric, still means intensive and

extensive logging, and ecological diminishment, of ancient old-growth

forests.  Certified management of secondary, regenerating and

reforested lands is welcome.  The forest conservation community must

be vigilante in delineating minimum acceptable standards for

certification that include strict maintenance of ecological processes

and patterns.  With only about 20% of the World's ancient forests

left, the default assumption should be that their best use is

preservation and/or non-logging conservation management alternatives. 

Procedures and standards must be established to determine when

"certified" logging should be considered.  Logging of old-growth

should only occur under exceptional circumstances of local need and

under local control.  Very rarely should industrial scale operations

be considered.  Anything else is capitulating to "certified"

destruction of the World's remaining forest wildlands.

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

 

Title:   Forest Certification Battle Axes Clash

Source:  Environment News Service, http://www.ens.lycos.com/

Status:  Copyright 2000, contact source for permission to reprint

Date:    April 19, 2000 

 

ANTWERP, Belgium, April 19, 2000 (ENS) - European environmental groups

have lashed out at the fledgling Pan-European Forest Certification

(PEFC) agency backed by the timber industry, accusing it of "bias," a

"closed door approach," and preventing wider stakeholder

participation.

 

Forest certification is the process of inspecting particular forests

or woodlands to see if they are being managed according to an agreed

set of standards.

 

Twenty-four NGOs from 12 countries discussed the PEFC at a meeting in

Antwerp last week. They complained that the PEFC has failed to show

that it would ensure meaningful improvement in forest management.

 

They back the competing global Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and

say the PEFC threatens to undermine progress towards global solutions

by focusing on Europe.

 

The attack comes as the PEFC is finalising accreditation of its first

three national schemes in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Consultants

hired by the PEFC are assessing programmes put forward by the three

countries. Public comments are welcome.

 

"This is an important step in fulfilling the objective of promoting

sustainable forest management," PEFC chairman Henri Plauche Gillon

said after a meeting in Luxembourg in early March finalised rules for

establishing that labeled timber comes from sustainably managed

forests. "PEFC believes that everyone's views should be heard."

 

"We could see 25 to 30 million hectares (96,500 to 115,800 square

miles) certified to the PEFC by the end of 2000," Plauche Gillon

predicted.

 

The 13.5 million hectares (52,110 square miles) already certified

under the Finnish national scheme are expected to rise to 22 million

(84,920 square miles) by the end of 2000.

 

Currently, 3.5 million hectares (13,510 square miles) are certified by

PEFC in Norway, and one million hectares (3,860 square miles) in

Sweden.

 

The anticipated rapid growth in use of the PEFC logo could pitch the

scheme into headlong competition with the global Forest Stewardship

Council, which has certified nine million hectares (34,740 square

miles) in Sweden.

 

Environmental NGOs are sceptical about whether PEFC is as effective in

representing wider stakeholder interests as the NGO backed Forest

Stewardship Council (FSC) system.

 

"They are trying to give the image of a credible label of sustainable

forestry, but are really just labelling the status quo," Ellen von

Zitzewitz of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) European policy

office said.

 

The global Forest Stewardship Council scheme, which WWF actively

supports, is "already a compromise between economic, social and

environmental factors" below which NGOs cannot go, she said.

 

The FSC has one-third of its representation from NGOs. in contrast,

PEFC offered just two of 18 seats on national bodies to them, an offer

von Zitzewitz said no NGO has taken up.

 

Environmental NGOs are concerned that logging continues in Europe's

last old growth forests in Norway and Sweden, and that indigenous

people's rights have been ignored.

 

The planned speed of PEFC's certification plans throws doubts on what

it is doing, von Zitzewitz said.

 

The industry certifying agency hopes to sign up 25 million hectares

(96,500 square miles) in Finland alone by year end, compared with a

total of 20 million (77,2000 square miles) certified by the FSC

worldwide in the past four years.

 

The industry's Pan European Forest Certification system outperforms

its global, NGO-backed rival on several counts in a comparative matrix

published by the European paper industry April 12.

 

Under preparation for the Confederation of European Paper Industries

(CEPI) for almost a year, the matrix assessed 26 national and

international schemes with the aim of providing reliable information

to purchasers and promoting mutual recognition. It was based on a

questionnaire sent to 46 organisations worldwide, some of whom have

still to reply.

 

The PEFC system scored more highly than the competing Forest

Stewardship Council on accreditation procedures at the national level

and transparency rules regarding public information, as well as on

compliance of accreditation bodies with International Standard

Organisation requirements.

 

On most other indices, such as independence and impartiality,

consensus building and product labelling, the two schemes performed

almost identically.

 

TWO SETS OF CERTIFICATION CRITERIA SIDE BY SIDE

 

The FSC certification criteria emphasize that ecological functions and

values shall be maintained intact, enhanced, or restored, including

forest regeneration and succession; genetic, species, and ecosystem

diversity; and natural cycles that affect the productivity of the

forest ecosystem. Compensation for indigenous peoples; protection for

rare, threatened and endangered species and their habitats and

environmentally friendly non-chemical methods of pest management are

emphasized.

 

The complete listing of FSC certification criteria is online at:

http://www.fscoax.org/principal.htm

 

PEFC bases its certification standards on the six Pan-European

Criteria for Sustainable Forest Management. In brief, "The stewardship

and use of forests and forest land in a way and at a rate, that

maintains their biodiversity, productivity, regeneration capacity,

vitality and their potential to fulfil now and in the future, relevant

ecological, economic and social functions, at local, national and

global levels and does not cause damage to other ecosystems."

 

The full set of criteria is online at: http://www.pefc.org/technic.htm

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS### 

This document is a PHOTOCOPY for educational, personal and non-

commercial use only.  Recipients should seek permission from the

source for reprinting.  All efforts are made to provide accurate,

timely pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all

information rests with the reader.  Check out our Gaia's Forest

Conservation Archives & Portal at URL= http://forests.org/ 

Networked by Forests.org, Inc., gbarry@forests.org