***********************************************
WORLDWIDE
FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS
Fibre-Optic
Cable May Be Funded Through Papua New Guinea Timber Sales
***********************************************
Forest Networking a Project of Forests.org
http://forests.org/ -- Forest
Conservation Archives
http://forests.org/web/ -- Discuss Forest
Conservation
08/25/00
OVERVIEW
& COMMENTARY
In a
shockingly shameful proposal, an Australian telecommunications
company
is seeking to finance 50% of a fibre-optic cable from Papua
New
Guinea (PNG) to Australia through sale of large amounts of PNG
rainforest
logs to China. This would likely
require breaching the
PNG
government's moratorium on opening new areas for commercial
logging. Further, Greenpeace rightly points out below
that it is
wrong
for PNG's people to have their biodiversity and culture sold
out
from under them to pay for basic services.
If PNG is to protect
its
ancient forests, constituting the third largest tropical
wilderness
in the World, Australian and other country's governments
and
companies need to honor basic principles of international
environmental
conduct. Both Chinese and Australian
interests should
support
PNG in its effort to protect its ancient forests, not be
plotting
new financial mechanisms to facilitate their liquidation. It
is
morally reprehensible that this proposal was made and preceded in
the
first place, and it will be unconscionable if it goes any further.
China
has devastated its own forests to the point that many large
ecosystems
are no longer functioning. Australia is
well on the way to
widespread
ecosystem failure due to ongoing large-scale agricultural
land
clearance and continued commercial development of its modest
ancient
forest reserves. The model of
development pursued by both
countries--trading
the environment for transitory capital flows--
provides
a poor example of how to achieve sustainable, equitable
development. Papua New Guinea can, should and must do
better.
g.b.
*******************************
RELAYED
TEXT STARTS HERE:
ITEM #1
Title: K119m deal could see PNG sell of its
rainforest
Source: The Independent (PNG), Copyright 2000
Date: August 24, 2000
A K119
million proposed deal for a fibre-optic cable to connect
Australia
and Papua New Guinea may force the PNG government to sell
off
part of the world's third largest rainforest. This was revealed by
Greenpeace
Pacific this week in a statement released from its office
in
Suva, Fiji.
It has
called on the Australian telecommunications company Optus to
immediately
pull out of the proposal.
According
to information from Greenpeace as part of the proposed
countertrade
deal, the PNG government would pay 50 per cent of the
US$33
million price tag of the submarine cable by selling the
equivalent
amount of PNG hardwood timber to the Chinese military.
China
recently stopped harvesting its own forests, after serious
flooding
in the country was blamed on logging, and has been looking
for
other timber sources, in particular in PNG.
According
to a report in the Australian Financial Review, under the
proposal
the PNG government would provide hardwood logs to the
People's
Republic of China to pay for its capable participation.
It is
believed that this timber would have to come from areas
currently
covered by a logging moratorium, as there would be an
insufficient
supply of timber from existing logging concessions.
Greenpeace
forests specialist Brian Brunton said the deal would breach
a PNG
government imposed 10-month logging moratorium on new timber
concessions.
"It
would also put the PNG economy at risk by breaching conditions of
a World
Bank International Monetary Fund bailout package. In December
last
year, the new PNG government imposed a moratorium on all new
forest
concessions, extensions and plantations. Almost half of PNG's
accessible
forests are already committed to industrial logging.
PNG
forests cover 40 million hectares, of which 15 million hectares
are
deemed loggable. The forests contain 5-7 per cent of the world's
biodiversity
in 001 per cent of the world's landmass. "The PNG people
should
not be forced to sell their biodiversity and culture to pay for
basic
services.
"Australian
companies and government need to work with the
democratically-elected
government of PNG to protect the world's third-
largest
untouched rainforest: the Amazon on Australia's doorstep.
"Companies
such as Optus should be exercising corporate responsibility
and
respecting PNG culture, environment and laws rather than coming up
with
these deals", Mr Brunton said.
Greenpeace
has obtained a letter dated June 28, 2000 from Douglas Bell
Consultancy
to the General Manager of Telikom PNG outlining the
counter-trade
proposal. The letter in part said, "Chinese authorities
have
already expressed an interest in the countertrade option.
Their
commodity interest is hardwood timber, and their participation
would
require use of their cableship for installing the submarine
cable,
and the collection of timber from PNG in Chinese registered
ships."
Attempts
to contact Telecom PNG Managing Director Sunil Andradi was
unsuccessful.
The
office of the Prime Minister Sir Mekere Morauta has assured
Greenpeace
that they were not aware of the proposal.
According
to another Australian newspaper, Advertiser (Adelaide),
Secretary
for Environment and Conservation Dr Wari Iamo two weeks ago,
asked
for international support if PNG is to protect its ancient
forests.
ITEM #2
Title: Logging on: PNG chips in for cable
Source: Australian Financial Review
Date: August 22, 2000
By: Rowan Callick
A new
$75 million fibre-optic cable proposed to connect Australia and
Papua
New Guinea could be purchased through bartering PNG rainforest
logs.
Cable
& Wireless Optus, cable layer Alcatel and PNG's monopoly telco,
Telikom,
have begun exploratory talks about the new cable.
But
Telikom, which would need to pay half, is broke.
So
lateral corporate thinkers have come up with a creative answer:
barter
the cable for rainforest.
This,
however, would create another immense problem: a moratorium on
new
timber concessions is a core condition for a global bailout of PNG
into
which the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the
Australian
Government have poured almost $500 million.
There
is a proposal for PNG Telikom's owner, the Government, to
provide
hardwood logs to the People's Republic of China to pay for its
cable
participation.
When
the Yangtze River suffered devastating floods two years ago,
China's
Premier, Mr Zhu Rongji, blamed the disaster on logging
upstream
by people who, he said, "have no intelligence and no virtue".
Mr Zhu
banned logging, and said: "We can completely depend on imports
to
solve the problem of inadequate timber supply."
And
PNG, which contains the third-largest surviving primary rainforest
in the
world, is being targeted as one of China's supply sources.
Mr Ian
Bell, a Singapore-based consultant to Alcatel Submarine
Networks,
one of the three major international cable layers, wrote to
Telikom
that China could provide its cable ship for installing the
cable
from Cairns to Port Moresby and collect timber in Chinese-
registered
ships.
Mr Paul
Banimbi, commercial manager of Telikom, said: "We are talking
to
people in other parts of the Government" about the proposal.
He
said: "There are different solutions, but timber is the guarantee
we are
looking at. And our minister will support us on this."
Alcatel's
manager in Australia, Mr Mike Kerr, said the present coaxial
cable,
installed about 20 years ago, was "getting a little bit old
now",
but its replacement was "a difficult one to finance".
He said
he had never been involved before in a project involving
counter-trade
or barter. "Whether that makes sense to PNG, I really
don't
know."
Mr Kerr
said PNG's situation was replicated elsewhere in the Pacific
region,
where it was proving a challenge to "find a way to cost-
effectively
connect these places into the fibre-optic network."
The
present cable has about 25 per cent free capacity, and Telstra,
its
owner with Telikom, has taken a different position from Optus and
Alcatel.
Telstra
is not convinced about the need or demand for a replacement
yet,
suggesting that a microwave link from Cape York would be a much
cheaper
alternative.
Telstra
and Optus have been competing for a role in PNG, to which the
former
sends all the traffic but from which Optus is the main agent,
having
established substantial satellite access.
The
two, in Optus's case via its owner Cable&Wireless, historically a
major
player in the Pacific, may also be competing next year when
Telikom
- which is just breaking even at present, despite holding a
telecommunications
monopoly for the country of 4.7 million - is
scheduled
for privatisation.
Mr Alan
Petts, director international of Optus, said: "We have a very
strong
relationship with PNG Telikom." But he said it was not
appropriate
to comment on the record about proposals for a new cable,
about
which nothing was yet final.
Mr
Klaus Rohland, the World Bank's country manager for PNG, said that
the
country's structural adjustment program was conditional in part on
a halt
to new timber permits until a major review had been completed.
He
said: "Forestry is a major source of corruption in PNG, and if we
are
serious about governance, we would want to get it in order.
"We
are all aware that the Chinese, because they have stopped logging
to
protect their own forests and watersheds, are really moving into
the
Pacific."
Mr
Rohland said that if the PNG Government were to seek to suspend the
moratorium,
"my first reaction would be 'no'".
Mr
Brian Brunton, Greenpeace's PNG-based Pacific forests specialist,
said on
Sunday: "To the extent that Optus may have been involved in
this
proposal, the message from us is: 'Optus, no'."
It
would be impossible to sell $35 million logs to China without
breaking
the moratorium.
He said
that China should be aware that the history of the timber
trade
with PNG was one of corruption, of transfer pricing and of
cheating
poor landowners, to the benefit of mainly Malaysian loggers
and of
Japanese and Chinese processors.
The
record of China's timber interests in PNG - where two leases are
being
operated, in East Sepik and Gulf provinces - was not positive,
he
said.
"And
Australian companies, too, need to ensure their investments in
PNG are
informed and responsible."
The
timber trade, he said, had been plagued by "bureaucratic
ineptitude,
corruption and backdoor deals, with a destabilising effect
on the
economy."
###RELAYED
TEXT ENDS###
This
document is a PHOTOCOPY for educational, personal and non-
commercial
use only. Recipients should seek
permission from the
source
for reprinting. All efforts are made to
provide accurate,
timely
pieces; though ultimate responsibility for verifying all
information
rests with the reader. Check out our
Gaia's Forest
Conservation
Archives & Portal at URL= http://forests.org/
Networked
by Forests.org, Inc., gbarry@forests.org