***********************************************

WORLDWIDE FOREST/BIODIVERSITY CAMPAIGN NEWS

World Rainforest Movement Bulletin #40

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Forests.org

  http://forests.org/ -- Forest Conservation Portal

  http://forests.org/web/ -- Discuss Forest Conservation

 

11/29/00

OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY

Every month the World Rainforest Movement puts out an e-publication

that is chock full of news and analysis regarding rainforest

conservation.  Occasionally I forward a copy to make you aware of

this excellent effort-you can subscribe by emailing WRM.  This issue

highlights the failure in the Hague to address climate change,

Gabon's new industrially orientated forest legislation, threats to

Ogiek's ancestral land rights in Kenya, clearcutting of rainforests

in Malaysia, and Thailand's diversity-based community forest

management system, among many other important stories.

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

 

Title:   WRM BULLETIN 40, NOVEMBER 2000

Source:  WORLD RAINFOREST MOVEMENT

  MOVIMIENTO MUNDIAL POR LOS BOSQUES

  International Secretariat              

  Maldonado 1858, CP 11200     

  Montevideo                                      

  Uruguay

  Ph +598 2 403 2989                      

  Fax +598 2 408 0762                    

  E-mail: wrm@wrm.org.uy                            

  Web page: http://www.wrm.org.uy         

Date:  November 27, 2000  

 

In this issue:

 

* OUR VIEWPOINT

 

- Those who did not "work it out" in The Hague

 

* LOCAL STRUGGLES AND NEWS

 

AFRICA

 

- Gabon: The new Forestry Law and transnational companies

- Kenya: Local peoples' land rights ignored

- Nigeria: Shell's choice between profits and principles

- Tanzania: Impasse on commercial shrimp farming at Rufiji Delta

mangroves

 

ASIA

 

- India: Mining and plantations put National Park at risk

- Laos: Subsidies for Swedish profits in the forestry sector

- Malaysia: Campaign against plantation and pulp mill project in

Sabah

- Malaysia: Where is Bruno Manser?

- Thailand: A diversity-based community forest management system

 

CENTRAL AMERICA

 

- Guatemala: Community forest concession initiative at Peten

questioned

 

SOUTH AMERICA

 

- Argentina: A shady carbon sink project

- Brazil: Aracruz caught red handed destroying native forests

- Chile: Wine production threatened by pulp mill project  

- Weyerhaeuser's president promotes plantations in Guyana

 

OCEANIA

 

- Australia: Woodchipping old growth forests for "renewable energy"

- Aotearoa/New Zealand: Logging company's dirty tricks revealed

 

* GENERAL

 

- Concerns over the revision of the World Bank's Indigenous Peoples

policy

- Films on forests and plantations receive award

 

***********************************************************

* OUR VIEWPOINT

************************************************************

 

- Those who did not "work it out" in The Hague

 

The Sixth Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Climate

Change is finally over and nothing much appears to have been achieved

to address global warming. This doesn't come as a surprise, given

that the majority of government delegates -- with a few exceptions --

focused more on how to obtain profits for their countries and

corporations from the new carbon trade than on finding true solutions

to the looming climate disaster.

 

In fact, the conference was more like a weekend bazar than a United

Nations meeting. A new generation of carbon brokers was out in force,

adding their voices to more traditional "business NGOs" composed of

oil corporations and other major polluters of the atmosphere. The

nuclear energy lobby was also prominent in the event, trying to sell

its "clean energy" as a solution to climate change.

 

Unfortunately, other, more respected actors, including environmental

non-governmental organizations, were also laying out their wares in

this marketplace, trying to sell forests and plantations as "emission

cuts" or "carbon sink mechanisms". This generated some divisions

among NGOs and Indigenous Peoples' Organizations, which weakened the

position of those truly interested in addressing climate change.

Southern governments, too, were divided on various issues,

particularly the so-called Clean Development Mechanism.

 

The atmosphere was much more humane outside the conference centre. A

demonstration organized by Friends of the Earth, for example, was a

huge success. People from all over the world joined forces to pile up

sandbags to form an enormous dyke in front of the conference centre.

Although the dyke was originally conceived as a symbol of the rising

waters which will come with global warming, it could also be

perceived as a dyke to protect the world from the decisions -- of the

lack thereof -- being taken inside the building.

 

And that was precisely the main problem: the lack of political will

to begin to do what everyone knows needs to be done. Or rather, too

much political will from the large corporations which dominate

politics in the US, Canada, Australia, Japan and other industrialized

countries, together with their armies of technocrats and tame civil

servants. Thus French President Chirac's statement criticizing the

trend of the negotiations was a welcome surprise. Among other things,

he stated that since 1992, Parties had fallen too far behind in

taking actions to combat climate change, and cautioned against

further delays. Furthermore, he highlighted that the US

produces a quarter of the world's emissions, and that the per capita

US levels of emissions are three times higher than those of France.

He called on the US to join other industrialized nations in making a

successful transition to an energy-efficient economy. He said the EU

had a duty to set an example by developing more economical forms of

consumption and production in terms of natural resources.

 

The US delegates were obviously not at all happy to hear this. Nor

did they like Chirac's support for an effective, equitable agreement

that leaves room for future development, an independent and impartial

compliance mechanism, effective cuts by Northern countries in their

emissions, and assistance for the most vulnerable countries to adapt

to the consequences of climate change. Noting that each country has a

duty to build structures that cut its own emissions to a minimum on a

sustainable basis, Chirac emphasized that setting up projects to

reduce emissions in other countries should not be seen as a means to

escape domestic measures. He called for a prudent approach to using

carbon sinks to alleviate climate change, and said that the ultimate

aim should be the convergence of per capita emissions.

 

Chirac's speech, however, was but a short parenthesis punctuating

closed-door dealings aimed at undermining everything he called for.

Emission cuts were never truly on the table. Neither was energy

efficiency or renewables. Even less so equity and justice. Corporate

lobbyists did their job well and visions of short-term financial

gains for a few elites clouded the brains of many Southern delegates,

whose countries and peoples will suffer most from climate change.

Obtaining a few dollars from prominent polluters for forest and

plantation projects was the aim of many -- never mind whether such

schemes were effective or not in slowing global warming. The US and

Japan, meanwhile, got their money's worth from these offers of bribes

in the form of support for some of their positions.

 

"Work it out!" was the official slogan of The Hague Conference. A

simple but meaningful slogan for anyone willing to understand and do

something -- but apparently meaningless to most of the government

delegates present at The Hague. Future generations confronted with

climate change will remember them as those who did NOT work it out.

 

(*) Quotations from Jacques Chirac's statement downloaded from the

Earth Negotiations Bulletin

 

************************************************************

* LOCAL STRUGGLES AND NEWS

************************************************************

 

AFRICA

 

- Gabon: The new Forestry Law and transnational companies

 

The draft Forestry Law being discussed by the Gabonese Parliament

encourages the industrialization of wood within the country.

According to the Ministry for Waters and Forests, the new law will

establish more strict rules concerning the exploitation of the

country's forests. Concessions to private companies will be granted

for a longer period of time, allegedly to favour the regeneration of

the forest. The government elected in December 1998 argues that its

policy tries to conciliate the interests of different agents

involved, with the aim of protecting the forests, and at the same

time diversifying its products. The Gabonese forestry sector has

until now strongly relied on the export of a single product: okoume

roundwood.

 

Even though this initiative, which tends to the diversification of

the country's economy, can be considered positive from a

macroeconomic point of view, capital questions remain unsolved. One

of them is that of public control over the use of natural resources.

In Gabon, as well as in other African countries, due to institutional

structural constraints protection norms are poorly implemented and

enforced. Does the new legislation create financial mechanisms to

ensure that the companies' operations are effectively controlled on

the ground?

 

The second relevant point is that of the so-called "stakeholders".

While transnational logging companies, responsible for the

destruction of tropical forests in the country, remain the most

important actors, forest dwelling peoples continue to be ignored.

Alternatives such as community forest management and locally-based

processing facilities are not taken into account. Additionally, the

new law appears to benefit specially --if not solely-- large logging

companies. In fact Societe Forestiere des Bois Tranches, Leroy Gabon,

Thanry, Groupe Rougier, Societe de Grumes de la Ngounie and other

important companies will be granted concessions for even longer

periods, and will almost certainly be the ones industrializing

roundwood, thus reaping the benefits of added value to the product.

 

In the context of an economy heavily dependent on the exploitation of

natural resources, massive foreign debt, and weak organization of

rural communities and civil society, the colonial vision prevails of

the forest as a mere source of wood managed and exploited by foreign

private companies. The new Forestry Law does not seem to help to

revert this situation.

 

Article based on information from: "Vers l'adoption d'une nouvelle

loi forestiere", Panafrican News Agency, November 3, 2000; "Slave and

Enclave. The Political Ecology of Equatorial Africa", Marcus

Colchester, WRM, 1994.

************************************************************

 

- Kenya: Local peoples' land rights ignored

 

Even though indigenous peoples and rural communities are the ones

directly bearing the brunt of the destruction of rainforests by

intruders, most national governments portray them as squatters and

responsible for the destruction of the forest and the extinction of

wildlife, and threaten them with eviction or undertake direct actions

to expel them from their homeland. This kind of abuse is often linked

to forest concessions awarded to logging companies --which

constitutes an absurd paradox if the aim of the authorities were to

protect the forest-- or the declared intention of protecting

endangered species, considering that nature conservation is only

possible in the absence of human beings. Both types of abuses are

happening in Kenya and the following are two such examples.

 

The Ogiek --a hunter-gatherer and harvester of honey people, dwelling

since time immemorial in the Mau Forest and adjacent areas-- have

once again been menaced by the authorities in order to force them to

abandon their ancestral lands. In 1991 the state partially recognized

their territorial rights to a portion of the Tinet forests, but this

did not result in an improvement in their situation. Nowadays the

Ogiek --numbering some 5000 people-- have been pushed into the last

Forest Belt of the former Mighty Mau and Mt. Elgon Forests. This is

the consequence of a process started in colonial times and continued

after the country's independence until the present time.

 

The successive governments have systematically ignored the Ogiek's

ancestral land rights, and allocated large areas of former forest

lands to the ruling elites. Additionally, part of the remaining

forest has been granted to logging companies, which would lead to

their quick destruction. Even though Kenya ratified several

international treaties related to the protection of the rights of

indigenous peoples --like the International Covenant on Economic,

Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil

and Political Rights-- they have not been respected when concrete

policies are formulated and implemented.

 

A second example of abuse over land rights is related to

conservation. A plan to be implemented by the Kenya Wildlife Service

in the Tana River District in Coast Province --with financial support

from the Global Environmental Facility (GEF)-- to protect the red-

capped manabey, an endangered monkey species, is being resisted by

residents of Ngao and Ndera locations. The official promise to

compensate land owners has divided the local residents into two

groups: one of them accepts to move from their farms along the river,

while the other vows to stay, arguing that money cannot compensate

for the loss of their land and the dramatic change in their

lifestyle. In fact people are proposed to move to the semi-arid

plains of Ozi and Kipini where there are no rivers.

 

Molu Shambaro, a local leader and member of Parliament for the

district, who is opposed to the eviction, has expressed that local

dwellers' rights have to be respected, and has proposed that the

wildlife service involves local people in their campaign to conserve

the Tana River mangabey instead of forcing them to leave their lands.

Shambaro asserted that if local people get involved, wildlife

conservation and traditional lifestyle in the area will become

compatible. He also accused both the government body and its GEF

counterpart of corruption, which is considered to be the main reason

for the failure of conservation projects in the country.

 

Article based on information from: International Network of Forests

and Communities, 27/10/2000, e-mail:

network@forestsandcommunities.org ;

http://www.forestsandcommunities.org ; Thousands Face Eviction to

Conserve Kenya's Tana River Mangabey, by Naftali Mungai,

http://ens-news.com/ens/oct2000/2000L-10-20-01.html

************************************************************

 

- Nigeria: Shell's choice between profits and principles

 

Shell is continuing its clever misleading propaganda orchestrated

through advertisements circulating in the most influencial press

media of the North, in order to revamp its tarnished image and

convince public opinion that it is an environmentally friendly

company. The campaign "Profits and Principles: Is there a choice?" is

based on beautiful photographs of wild animals, lush forests, and

tender faces of African people accompanied by texts like: "Time and

again at Shell we're discovering the rewards of respecting the

environment when doing business". "If we're exploring for oil and gas

reserves in environmental sensitive regions, we consult widely with

the different local and global interest groups to ensure than

biodiversity in each location is preserved." "At Shell we are

committed to support fundamental human rights. We invest in the

communities around us to create new opportunities and growths."

 

Nevertheless in the Niger Delta reality could not be more far away

from the self image the company is making efforts to show. Since

1958, when Shell arrived to the region a nightmare began for the

Ogoni, an indigenous nation of about 500,000 people living in the

area. Counting on the support of successive governments Shell took

hold of Ogoniland. As in other parts of the world where oil is

exploited, the result has been high unemployment and poverty rates,

environmental devastation and loss of livelihoods for the local

people. Repression has been brutal. About 80,000 people had their

villages destroyed and about 2,000 were killed by the state armed

corps. Last November 10th marked the 5th anniversary of the murder of

the environmental leaders Ken Saro Wiwa, Barinem Kiobel,  John

Kpuinen, Saturday Dorbee,  Paul Levura, Nordu Eawo,  Felix Nuate, 

Daniel Gboko and Baribor Bera. Their "crime" was to fight for the

rights of their people against abuses commited by Shell and the

Nigerian military government that was backing it.

 

In 1993 the Ogoni declared Shell "persona non grata" and got it out

of their lands. But after an absence of seven years the company is

menacing to return to Ogoniland. In April this year the announcement

was made that the only aim of Shell was to remove its remaining

facilities, which were causing environmental problems in the area due

to the emission of poisonous gases and uncontrolled leaking.

Nonetheless in October Shell admitted that its real intentions were

to reactivate its 125 oil wells in the region. If this happens

violence, collusion and misery will increase. It is clear that Shell

has got an answer to the question of whether there is a choice

between profits and principles. The answer is yes and the choice is

profits.

 

Article based on information from:  "Some things never change" by

Andy Rowell and Owens Wiwa, The Guardian, 8/11/2000; "Greenwash

Award: Shell. Clouding the Issue" by Kenny Bruno, 15/11/2000

( http://www.corpwatch.org/greenwash/shell.html ); MOSOP Ogoni,

17/11/2000, e-mail: mosopgb@hotmail.com

 

(The full text of the memorial message from Ms. Gbenewa Phido,

President of MOSOP-UK on 11/11/2000 to mark the 5th memorial

anniversary of the murder of Ken Saro Wiwa and other Ogoni leaders,

has been included in our web site under: Information by

country/Nigeria. Previous articles published in our Bulletin about

the struggle of the peoples of the Niger Delta are available in the

same site)

************************************************************

 

- Tanzania: Impasse on commercial shrimp farming at Rufiji Delta

mangroves

 

The Rufiji Delta in South Eastern Tanzania holds some 53,255 hectares

of unspoiled mangrove forest. These mangroves are not only a key

element for the environment in the region by stabilising the

coastline, building land through accumulation of silt and the

production of detritus, preserving the quality of water, and serving

as windbreaks for the hinterland, but also constitutes the source of

livelihoods for thousands of people living there (see WRM Bulletin

12).

 

In April 1999, Tanzanian NGOs were able to secure an interim order

staying plans of the African Fishing Company's 10,000 hectare shrimp

farm project at Rufiji Delta. Would the project have been

implemented, one third of the whole Rufiji Delta would have ended up

in the hands of the company for a period of no less than ten years,

thus threatening the livelihoods of thousands of local farmers and

fisherfolk living in the delta, and causing severe environmental

impacts that would have put at risk the future of the region.

 

The panel of three judges chosen to hear and dictate on the case

disintegrated when one of its members retired and another one was

transferred. The case has not yet been assigned to another panel and

it appears that at present there are not enough judges to constitute

a new one. In the meantime, the company is said to be facing severe

financial constraints which would have even forced it to sell part of

its assets. Although the situation is not yet clear, it seems that

the efforts carried out by concerned citizens and organizations have

managed to save --at least for the time being-- the mangroves and

local peoples' livelihoods.

 

Article based on information from: Late Friday News, 71st Edition,

October 2000; e-mail: mangroveap@olympus.net

************************************************************

 

ASIA

 

- India: Mining and plantations put National Park at risk

 

The temporary work permit given to the Kudremukh Iron Ore Company

(KIOCL) to continue the extraction of iron in the Kudremukh National

Park, located in the Western Ghats region of the state of Karnataka,

has given place to severe criticism from national and international

environmental NGOs, which had been putting pressure on the

authorities for the company's request to be denied.

 

KIOCL has been operating in the Aroli and Malleshwara regions of

Kudremukh National Park, under a 30-year lease, which expired in July

1999. Since then, the company has been lobbying to obtain a 20-year

extension on the lease, but it has only been granted two successive

year long temporary permits.

 

Impacts of mining in the area are apparent. A report of the Indian

NGO Environment Support Group (ESG) proves that many fish varieties

have disappeared due to pollution, and points out that farmers

complain about the decline in agricultural productivity downstream

due to deposition of mine tailings. River pollution has provoked an

increase in cases of disease among villagers. In 1987 a 67 metre long

slurry pipeline broke and its leakage reached the Yennehole River,

which led to severe environmental damage.

 

The only action supposedly undertaken by KIOCL to mitigate the

impacts on forests and rivers in the area has been to plant alien

trees! The company adduces having implemented a "reforestation"

programme by planting 7.5 million acacia, eucalyptus and other alien

tree species. If such claims were true it would make things even

worse, since the substitution of a portion of forest by a plantation

prevents the regeneration of the secondary forest, thereby

impoverishing the environment. Both mining and plantations are a

direct cause of deforestation. Nevertheless that of Kudremukh

constitutes a particular case where both activities combine to

destroy the forest.

 

At present the State Government has ordered an environmental impact

study be undertaken before an extension on the lease is granted.

However, this is not seen as a sufficient guarantee by local

environmentalists. Leo Saldanha from the Environment Support Group

says: "I sincerely believe that a systematic public campaign is the

most appropriate option to ensure mining ends in Kudremukh. Nothing

like the people's will to bend a government that is intent on

violating public commitments and the law."

 

Article based on information from: Drillbits & Tailings; 18/8/2000.

Volume 5, Number 13

************************************************************

 

- Laos: Subsidies for Swedish profits in the forestry sector

 

On 7th November 2000 the formal opening of a US$2.9 million

laminated-wood processing factory took place at Nabong Farm, 30

kilometres from Vientiane, the capital of Lao PDR. The factory will

initially sell timber pallets to IKEA, the Swedish retailing giant,

and in future will produce furniture under the trademark Vicwood.

Financing came from a series of loans --US$550,000 from IKEA,

US$800,000 from the International Finance Corporation, the private

sector arm of the World Bank, and US$300,000 from Swedfund, the

Swedish IFC counterpart. The timber will come from Burapha's

1,200 hectares of Eucalyptus camaldulensis plantations, and from the

Asian Development Bank's Industrial Tree Plantations project, which

aims to establish 10,000 hectares of plantations in Laos.

 

Burapha's publicity materials claim that the factory will bring

"beautiful hardwoods" to "discerning world markets without

devastating the natural tropical forests". However, while IKEA has

found a new source of cheap timber, with or without Burapha's factory

project the logging of Laos' forests continues.

 

The Burapha Group is structured perfectly to gain the most from the

subsidies available for plantation development in Laos. The company

is a subsidiary of the Swedish forest industry company Silvi Nova AB,

and in Laos consists of three companies: BAFCO (Burapha Agroforestry

Co. Ltd.); NAFCO (Nabong Farm Co. Ltd.); and BDC (Burapha Development

Consultants Co. Ltd.). The first two companies are commercial

ventures --BAFCO produces and exports wood based products from its

own plantations, and NAFCO is a dairy farm which supplies Vientiane

with dairy products, chicken and eggs. BDC however plays a very

different role, being the largest consulting firm in Laos, providing

advice on financial analysis, engineering, environment, forestry,

agriculture and livestock and rural development.

 

In the early 1990s Burapha Development Consultants (along with Jaakko

Poyry) won a contract for consultancy services for the Asian

Development Bank's US$16 million Industrial Tree Plantations Project.

Today, the Burapha Group factory in Nabong buys timber from

eucalyptus plantations established under the ADB project.

 

In 1995 Jaakko Poyry and Burapha produced a report for the ADB

commenting on the Lao Government's laws on plantations, Directive

186. Among the consultant's recommendations were that export taxes

and transport taxes should be reduced. In other words, the

consultants recommend increasing their company's profits at the

expense of villagers' land and livelihoods.

 

When the Lao Government gets advice from forestry consultants through

a project funded by the Asian Development Bank, it may believe that

it is getting the best advice that money can buy. In Burapha's case

however there is a clear conflict of interest. The company is

providing advice recommending more subsidies through the ADB to

produce cheap timber which Burapha then buys and exports. No wonder

that a Burapha representative in Vientiane said about the ADB

project, "The project for Burapha has been a success, I'm not sure

about the project as a whole".

 

By: Chris Lang, e-mail: chrislang@t-online.de

************************************************************

 

- Malaysia: Campaign against plantation and pulp mill project in

Sabah

 

A plantation project that would occupy about 3% of the area of Sabah,

in northern Borneo, and provoke the clearcutting of 6% of its

dwindling primary forests is being promoted in Kalabakan by a joint-

venture between the State-owned company Innoprise Corporation Sdn

Bhd, Lions Group of Malaysia and the China Fuxing Pulp and Paper

Industries of China. The plantation and pulp and paper mill

megaproject, whose cost has been evaluated in U$S 1.1 billion, will

require the felling of 240,000 hectares of forest to be replaced by a

massive monoculture plantation of black wattle trees (Acacia mangium)

--also known as dry acacia or mangium tree-- a fast growing tree

native to Australia.

 

The project has sparked criticism because of its expected impacts and

for not having even adhered to the weak legal environmental

requirements existing in Sabah. According to the Sabah Conservation

of Environment Prescribed Activities, any forest which is cleared for

the felling of timber covering an area of 500 hectares or more or any

development of forest plantation of 500 hectares or more requires an

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Nevertheless 12,000 hectares

of the land of the proposed project have already been logged without

a single EIA done. Innoprise Corporation has claimed that no EIA is

required since the logging operation was approved before the State

EIA requirement was enforced, and announced the logging of another

33,000 hectares. The company completely ignores the Federal

Government's Environment Quality Act of 1974 and the Environmental

Quality Order of 1987 which oblige to perform EIA for these kind of

activities. Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) --Friends of the Earth

Malaysia-- has denounced that by allowing the logging to proceed

without an EIA, the Sabah Government is completely disregarding the

environmental impacts of the logging activities and is manipulating

the law in favour of the interests of big companies and to the

detriment of forest conservation.

 

It is reasonably feared that this huge plantation will provoke

deletereous impacts on the environment. The plantation area will cut

the biggest remaining block of continuous forest in the region which

extends between the Danum Valley and the Maliau Basin, both

classified as Class One Protection Areas. The area contains high

biodiversity levels, including 120 mammal, 280 bird, and more than

2500 tree species. This biodiversity rich ecosystem is in danger of

being substituted by a uniform and biodiversity poor agrosystem.

Already wild animals are reported to have been sighted more often,

probably fleeing from the logged area. Since the land of the proposed

project is mostly steep, felling for plantations will expose the soil

to direct erosion by rainfall. Sediments could reach the coastal

mangrove vegetation in Cowie Bay, depleting marine resources.

Consequences are already apparent: with only 12,000 hectares logged

the Danum Valley has been recently flooded. Local microclimate will

also be affected because often once the rainforest is replaced with a

plantation it will dry and heat up. Additionally, this could create

negative conditions for the plantation itself, which would become

more prone to fires.

 

The effects of pulping and bleaching are also threatening. The use of

chlorine in bleaching the pulp has caused the industry to be the

third largest source of dioxin and its related compounds in the

world. This problem is further compounded by the fact that Malaysia

still has no policy on dioxin damage prevention. Carbon dioxide,

sulphur oxides and chloroform are some of the polluting gases emitted

by this industry. Furthermore about 300 chemicals, among them organic

pollutants, chlorophenicols, acidic and organichlorine compounds have

been identified in pulp and paper mill effluents. 

 

To stop further destruction, SAM has called the State Government of

Sabah and the Federal Government to halt all further logging

activities, take action against the parties that are responsible for

logging the 12,000 hectares of forest without an EIA, undertake a

comprehensive EIA of the project, seek extensive and genuine feedback

from the public in relation to the reviewing of the EIA, review as a

whole given the magnitude and scale of its expected environmental

impacts. Additionally an international campaign has been launched to

oppose this project. Those interested in participating are invited to

visit our new web site (www.wrm.org.uy) under Action Alerts - October

2000.

 

Article based on information from: "International alert to save Sabah

Rainforests from Pulp and Paper project in Kalabakan" by Friends of

the Earth Malaysia - Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM), October 2000. E-

mail: meenaco@pd.jaring.my

************************************************************

 

- Malaysia: Where is Bruno Manser?

 

Since May 2000 Bruno Manser is missing. This human rights activist

wanted to visit his friends, the Penan forest nomads in Sarawak, who

are surrounded by logging companies, the army and the police. It

seems he never arrived. Search parties have had no luck. Now the

Swiss Diplomatic Corps has stepped in. Manser could have been

arrested, had an accident or could have been murdered. We sincerely

hope that none of those situations occured. In the meantime, we

extend our wholehearted support to Bruno's family and friends.

 

Further information on Bruno Manser's situation is available in the

"Information by country" section (Malaysia) in our web site at:

http://www.wrm.org.uy

 

Article based on information from: Ruedi Suter. "The Swiss Diplomatic

Corps have started an official search for the rain forest protector".

E-mail: info@bmf.ch  For detailed information on the situation of the

indigenous peoples in Sarawak:

http://www.bmf.ch/action/chronologie_2000_en.html

************************************************************

 

- Thailand: A diversity-based community forest management system

 

Among at least 400 modern "community forest" systems in the hilly

upper Northern region of Thailand is that of Mae Khong Saai village

in Chiang Dao district of Chiang Mai province. The system features 57

hectares of agricultural fields in which at least 10 different  types

of paddy rice are grown in stepped fields in the valley bottoms. Some

10 varieties of dryland rice are also cultivated in hill fields,

which rotate on a cycle of 3-5 years. 

 

Some 643 hectares of community use forest are carefully distinguished

from 980 hectares of protected forest, between them encompassing six

different native forest types. Some 58 herbal medicines on which

villagers depend are locally cultivated, some in a protected

pharmaceutical garden in the middle of the forest.  Altogether,

forest food and medicine yield the equivalent of US$700 per year for

each of the village's 22 households. As well as providing wood for

local use, the forests also help preserve the nature of the streams

that lace the area, which provide water for agriculture and drinking,

as well as the 17 carefully conserved species of fish which

supplement the local food supply. 

 

All aspects of the system --agriculture, community-use forest,

protected forest, fisheries-- are interdependent.  The whole pattern,

meanwhile, relies for its survival on local villagers' protection. 

For example, the use of fire is carefully controlled by locals so

that devastating blazes don't strike the local forest, as they often

do the surrounding region's monoculture tree plantations.

 

Regular monitoring, together with a newly-formalized system of rules

and fines covering forest, stream and swidden use, helps maintain the

local biotic mosaic. Political vigilance is also crucial.  In 1969,

locals teamed up with concerned government officials to stave off a

threat by commercial loggers to devastate the area. Today, Mae Khong

Saai villagers are fighting a 1993 government decree ordering them

out of the Wildlife Sanctuary which was established in 1978 on the

land they inhabit and protect. 

 

Mae Khong Saai's insistence on local stewardship is obviously good

for the area's biodiversity.  A recent rapid wildlife survey in and

around the village resulted in sightings of many species --including

a flock of Oriental Pied Hornbills (Anthracoceras  albirostris)--

that indicate that the area is one of the most biologically diverse

in Thailand.  Animals including bear, dear, gibbon, boar and various

wild cats, as well as over 200 species of birds, take advantage of

the tapestry of local ecosystems. 

 

Thoroughly integrated with lowland economies, polities and cultures,

Mae Khong Saai couldn't be further from the romantic cliche of a

completely isolated, self-sufficient community.  As well as marketing

forest products, many community members periodically take jobs far

outside the community, some in distant cities. In their defense of

local livelihoods and the biodiversity they rely on, moreover, Mae

Khong Saai's residents depend partly on alliances they have fashioned

not only with similar communities across Thailand's northern

mountains but also with urban-based NGO movements. Arguably, the

community owes even its current identity and way of life on the

periphery partly to the history of uneasy relations between the Karen

people who inhabit it and the modern, nationalistic, racialist Thai

state which has developed over the past century. Whatever successes

its forest stewardship system achieves will owe much to the way it is

able to converse and negotiate with lowland and international powers

in renewing its strategies for local control.

 

Article based on information from: Environmental Improvement

Department, Northern Development Foundation, Project for Ecological

Recovery, Northern Watershed Development Project, Northern Farmers

Network, and villagers from three Northern Thai communities,

Raayngaan Phol Kaan Wijay Rueang Khwaam Laaklaai Thaang Chiiwaphaap

lae Rabop Niwet nai Khat Paa Chum Chon Phaak Nuea Tawn Bon, Chiang

Mai, 1997. Summarized by Larry Lohmann with thanks to Montri

Chanthawong for providing this book, which he helped compile.

************************************************************

 

CENTRAL AMERICA

 

- Guatemala: Community forest concession initiative at Peten

questioned

 

A new type of forest conservation initiative is being implemented in

Guatemala since 1995. According to its promoters, it attempts to

couple community-based sustainable development with the protection of

the Peten forests in the multiple use zone of the Maya Biosphere

Reserve, the largest protected area in Central America. 

 

The government has recently granted five community organizations --

formed mostly by subsistence farmers-- permission to log trees in

their neighbouring forests over the next 25 years. The process is

being monitored to see how effective these locally managed forest

concessions will be, both in curbing deforestation and in providing

cash to local residents. The Costa Rica based Tropical Agricultural

Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE), the Guatemala's Park

Agency, (CONAP), two national NGOs ("Naturaleza para la Vida" -

Nature for Life and "Propeten") and the U.S. Agency for International

Development (USAID) are supporting these concessions in the area.

 

From the official viewpoint, the increase of the population in the

Peten area is the main factor for forest degradation and destruction.

The government argues that the population of Peten --which nowadays

is composed of some 90,000 inhabitants-- is expanding at a high rate,

and that since 1986 settlers have deforested nearly 10 percent of the

reserve area. The rationale of the initiative is that communities

with concessions which have a contract with the state will prevent

other people from settling in the area or convert the forest to other

uses, and at the same time obtain economic benefits from forest

exploitation. Communities that do not adhere to their contracts would

lose their concessions.

 

Nevertheless, such view ignores the influence of other activities

provoking the degradation of the reserve, as for example oil

concessions granted by the government itself (see WRM Bulletin 21)

and illegal logging which has affected especially cedar (Cedrela

odorata) and mahogany (Swietenia macrophilla).

 

Additionally, the above referred concessions are focused on timber

production, ignoring that forests are not only a source of wood for

local communities, which find many uses from the non-timber forest

products provided by the forest. As a result, granting of concessions

has focused exclusively on timber production. For example, the

community of Uaxactun found it difficult to get a concession, since

its plans did not include logging but the exploitation of non-timber

products. Some communities which derived their livelihoods from the

use of different forest products, mainly "xate" (Chamaedorea spp.)

and "chicle" (Manilkara achras) are increasingly devoting themselves

to log extraction, which has created internal conflicts between those

who want to maintain their traditional lifestyle and those who prefer

logging.

 

The concept of "sustainable forest use" is also under question

because social and environmental impacts of logging have not been

taken into account, and it is doubtful that in all cases a monetary

gain will be obtained. There are also allegations that the activities

of the accompanying NGOs have not benefitted the communities and are

said to have focused on perpetuating themselves. At least one of them

has been questioned for trying to interfere in the internal

organization of peasant communities, while its activities should be

limited to help them during the process of community forest

management.

 

All the above has led to different opinions regarding this approach,

which will need to be thoroughly analysed before moving forward.

Local communities --and not external actors-- should be the real

beneficiaries and non-wood products should be given priority over

timber production in order to ensure the sustainable use of the

forest and the well-being of the local population.

 

Article based on information from:

http://headlines.igc.apc.org:8080/enheadlines/968724096/index_html  ;

Elmer Lopez, 11/19/2000, e-mail: elmer.lopez@dialb.greenpeace.org ;

Carlos Albacete, 16/10/2000, e-mail: tropicoverde@guate.net

************************************************************

 

SOUTH AMERICA

 

- Argentina: A shady carbon sink project

 

While government representatives were discussing at the Hague the

supposed benefits of including forests and plantations in the so-

called Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol of the

Climate Change Convention, an unusual project in Argentina was giving

reason to those opposing such inclusion.

 

In February this year the company "El Foyel S.A.", the new owner of a

plot of 7,800 hectares located in El Foyel, in the southern Province

of Rio Negro, addressed the Andean Forest Service (SFA) to apply for

an authorization to open up and rehabilitate several kilometres of

roads within a forest in the region, and to cut 300 hectareas of this

valuable ecosystem in order to substitute it with oregon and radiata

pine plantations. This forest borders the Nahuel Huapi National Park,

close to the touristic city of Bariloche.

 

Three months later, even lacking the required authorization, the

company began the logging operations. The SFA reacted accusing it of

"blatant infringement of the law", causing the destruction of one

hundred cypress trees, as well as "nire" (Nothofagus antartica),

"maiten" (Maytenus boaria) and other native tree species.

Nevertheless, this episode is but the tip of the iceberg of a much

more shady situation. In fact, the project implies the destruction,

not of 300 but of 4,500 hectares of forests and their substitution by

pines.

 

To present the undertaking under a "green" mask, the proponents claim

that the project includes the "sustainable management" of 1,800

hectares of native forest, including species such as "lenga"

(Nothofagus punilis) and cypress. However, its main objective is to

make profits from both wood extraction and the sale of carbon

credits.

 

The strong links of the involved businessmen with local authorities

have made it possible that, despite the project's characteristics,

the Provincial Office for the environment approved the Environmental

Impact Study. The final decision on the project is now in the hands

of the Forestry Department. For the time being, the project has been

suspended as a result of the sanctions it received for having started

the opening of roads without due permission.

 

Local villagers, academics and experts have expressed their

opposition to the project. The NGO "Comunidad de Limay" is involved

in a campaign to stop it, and has gone to court arguing that a

process of public consultation has not taken place and that the

project breaches the law, which protects native forests. Additionally

Dr. Thomas Kitzberger and Dr. Estela Raffaele, of the National

University of Comahue, warned that the project is located close to a

national park, in an area where the North Patagonian Corridor is

projected --aimed at protecting the mobility of species and thus to

protect biodiversity. Their report also questions the "sustainable

development" management techniques proposed to manage the

1,800 hectares of forest which will not be cut down. The Andean

Forestry Service has underscored that the felling of nire can

adversely affect other native species --such as cypress-- which grow

associated to it. Concern over the aggressive way oregon pine

regenerates --leading eventually to the substitution of native

species-- has also been expressed. Other scientists from the National

University of Comahue point out that there is no evidence that pine

plantations are more efficient than forests concerning carbon dioxide

absorption.

 

On November 5th the protest gained the streets, when environmentalist

NGOs of Chubut and Rio Negro organized a demonstration "in favour of

the biodiversity of the Southern forests of the Planet". Proyecto

Lemu, the Chubut Antinuclear Movement, Mapuche and Tehuelche

indigenous groups, Greenpeace-Argentina, Puelo Bird Society, Atech

and Cetera participated in the mobilization.

 

Even though Argentina is commonly associated with vast prairies, it

is also true that at the beginning of the 20th century the country

had more than 100 million hectares of forests. Nowadays there are

less than 20 million hectares left, and half of them are suffering an

accelerated process of degradation. The expansion of pine and

eucalyptus monocultures poses a direct threat to these surviving

ecosystems, and the case of El Foyel is but one in a long list of

forest destruction.

 

The same as in other projects implemented in several countries, this

"carbon sink" project clearly shows that such an approach is not the

solution to global climate --since more carbon is released to the

atmosphere through deforestation than that absorbed by tree planting-

- and that it causes severe social and environmental impacts at the

local level. Nonetheless, they are big business for a few

businessmen, for whom the tragedy of climate change is but a new and

excellent opportunity for making money.  

 

Article based on information from: Lucas Chiappe, Coordinator of

"Proyecto Lemu", 24/10/2000 y 19/11/2000; e-mail: lemu@elbolson.com ; 

Juan Carlos Villalonga, Greenpeace Argentina, 24/10/2000, e-mail:

energia@ar.greenpeace.org ; "Algunos datos de los danos ecologicos en

nuestro pais" by Ramon Reges, November 2000.

************************************************************

 

- Brazil: Aracruz caught red handed destroying native forests

 

For almost a decade, Aracruz Cellulose has been spending much time

and money to portray itself as an example of a socially and

environmentally responsible corporation. It has consistently denied

the negative impacts of its operations in the Brazilian states of

Espirito Santo and Bahia and has gone as far as to state that it has

never carried out deforestation operations. A recent information

proves the contrary.

 

On October 20, while a public hearing organized by the Centre for

Environmental Resources (CER) was taking place to discuss the further

expansion of Aracruz Cellulose's eucalyptus plantations in the

extreme South of the State of Bahia, local civil society

organizations were able to establish that native trees were being cut

down in a property recently purchased by the company in the

municipality of Caravelas.

 

This environmental crime was filmed by the organizations and

presented on the same day at the public hearing held in Posto da

Mata, Nova Vicosa. Several executives from Aracruz, including the

company's environmental manager, were present at the meeting.

 

Melquiades Spinola --coordinator of local NGO CEPEDES-- said that

this episode shows that the company's environmental discourse is very

different from its environmental practice. "Aracruz underestimates

civil society organizations and State agencies. Even during the

process to obtain the licence for the expansion of its plantations,

its field activities are carried out in a predatory manner", Spinola

said.

 

According to activists from CEPEDES and from the Centre for the

Defense of Human Rights --who presented the exact geographic

coordinates of the written report-- Aracruz had recently purchased

that land from Carlos Ancine Fae. Workers from the company contracted

by Aracruz, declared that no-one from the environment department of

the contractor had been present during the work carried out with the

use of a tractor, nor during the application of herbicides.

 

Jose Augusto Tosato, representative of CEPEDES, stated that the CER

needs to increase its monitoring of Aracruz, to find out if all the

conditions imposed for the granting of the previous licenses had been

fulfilled and particularly to continue carrying out the ecological

and economic zoning of the extreme south of Bahia, as decreed by

Governor Cesar Borges on 17 May this year, but that has still not

begun to be implemented.

 

According to the coordinator of the Bahia Environmental Group, the

government decided to suspend the licensing of Aracruz until the

zoning process is completed. "We hope that this decision is carried

out, because if zoning is implemented in a participatory manner and

with the adequate instruments and methodologies, it will result in

safeguarding the interests of the region's society as a whole,

restricting the uncontrolled expansion of monocultures and

guaranteeing better conditions for environmental conservation."

 

Article based on information from: Maiza de Andrade, "Empresa e

flagrada destruindo arvores na regiao extremo-sul", A Tarde Online,

24/10/00

(http://www.atarde.com.br/materia.php3?mes=10&ano=2000&id_materia=260

036)

************************************************************

 

- Chile: Wine production threatened by pulp mill project

 

For decades small and medium scale peasants of the Itata Valley have

developed economic activities based on wine production. Wines

produced in the area have recently obtained a high quality export

product certification. As a result of their hard work during years,

the population of the region has been able to generate an activity

having enornous economic and social potential.

 

In January this year the Regional Commission for the Environment

(COREMA) of the VIII Region rejected the application for the project

"Industrial Forestry Complex Itata", to be located in the area. The

project comprises several activities related to the forestry sector,

including the setting up of a pulp mill at the Itata Valley. The

reason for the denial of the authorization was that such project

would generate negative environmental impacts. The proponent company

--Celulosa Arauco y Constitucion S.A.-- belongs to the Angelini

Group, one of the most powerful economic holdings in the country.

 

Celulosa Arauco appealed to the National Commission for the

Environment (CONAMA). According to the Chilean Basic Environmental

Law, whenever such situation occurs, the body in charge of making a

final decision on the viability of the questioned project is the

Cabinet Meeting. The Cabinet is advised by a Consultative Council

which --in theory-- is formed by representatives of different

sectors, such as NGOs, scientists, independent academic centres,

workers, companies and the government. However, their delegates are

not democratically elected by the organizations, but directly

nominated by the country's President. 

 

In a surprising move, a few days ago the Consultative Council decided

to recommend to the Cabinet Meeting that the environmental permit for

the project be granted. How can this be explained? Several public

services, as well as an Expert Panel of the Catholic University of

Chile especially contracted to study the project, had concluded that

the establishment of the pulp mill in the Itata Valley is

incompatible with the current economic activity prevailing in the

area: grape and wine production. The implementation of the project

would result in a conflict between two incompatible economic

activities: the current wine-tourism activity versus industrial

forestry.

 

Additionally, from the very beginning the project has been strongly

opposed by the five communities living nearby the projected site of

the Itata Complex (Ranquil, Coelemu, Trehuaco, Quillon and

Portezuelo). Far from being groundless, their opposition is based on

the fact that the installation of a pulp mill would produce high

levels of pollution. The industrial production of cellulose implies

the use of chemicals containing chlorine which are highly toxic.

Additionally, dioxines are emitted to the air. These substances have

proved mutagenic and carcinogenic. This means that not only the

environment would be negatively affected, but also severe damages

would impact on the health and life quality of the people living in

this valley.

 

An argument frequently used to promote this type of investments is

that of job generation, which currently constitutes a severe problem

in Chile. Nonetheless, also in this regard the recommendation of the

Consultative Council is not appropriate, since at present grape and

wine production provides 3,000 permanent jobs, while the Itata

Forestry Complex would generate only a total of 1,200 jobs.

 

Many questions remain unanswered. What is really being evaluated? Is

it the lobbying ability and the power of one of the major economic

groups in the country or the environmental impacts of the project?

Are community interests and local economies really taken into account

when deciding what is best for them?

 

Now the responsibility lies in the hands of the Cabinet Meeting. Its

decision will in fact reveal what the real environmental and economic

policy of the Chilean government is.

 

By: Flavia Liberona, RENACE, 10/11/2000; e-mail: 

alerce.renace@rdc.cl

************************************************************

 

- Weyerhaeuser's president promotes plantations in Guyana

 

Dr Conor Wilson Boyd --president of Weyerhaeuser Forestlands

International, a company owning a total of 28 million acres of forest

in North America and established in 32 countries-- made a

presentation during a meeting organized by the Iwokrama International

Rainforest Centre for Rainforest Conservation and Development last

October in Georgetown.

 

Weyerhaeuser president's presentation was largely focused on the

promotion of plantations. However, if --as Dr Boyd said-- "the

business perspective of companies should take into consideration the

social and environmental impact on communities", then it should be

clear that tree plantations should not be promoted at an industrial

scale, which is precisely what companies such as Weyerhaeuser do.

 

Large scale monocultures --these are the plantations currently being

implemented by companies such as this throughout the world-- have

already proven to have deletereous effects on both people and

environment, among which deforestation. Plantations do not "ease the

pressure on the indigenous forests." On the contrary, they constitute

the final step of a process of forest degradation which ends by

substituting the diverse local forests with alien tree monocultures.

 

The above is not only an "environmental" issue: it is a social one.

Forest and forest-dependent peoples view plantations as an even worse

disaster than logging, because plantations expropriate their whole

territories permanently. This means that they are deprived of all the

resources provided by the forest, including food, medicines, fibres,

firewood, building material, etc.

 

Dr Boyd also said that tree plantations provide employment, and

further stated that they provide more jobs than intensive agriculture

projects. This is in fact totally untrue. Plantations provide very

few, seasonal and low quality jobs and even those only during the

plantation phase. Once the trees are planted, employment drops

dramatically until harvest. But even at harvest, the current

technology in use implies that only few workers are needed to operate

the modern harvesting machines.

 

The real problem that Weyerhaeuser is now facing --the same as other

logging companies-- is that they have depleted the world's forest

resources through unsustainable forest mining practices and they now

quickly need vast amounts of cheap raw material to continue in

business. In line with that, what they are now doing is moving South

to find cheap land, cheap labour, low environmental standards and

fast tree growth in order to ensure their own --not "the world's"--

provision of wood to continue promoting unsustainable levels of

consumption in the North. The same discourse as the one presented in

Guyana is being deployed by company executives throughout the South.

In the meantime, local people and the environment continue suffering

from the impacts of the "sustainable" plantations that those

companies promote for their own benefit.

 

Article based on information from: Andrew Richards, "Plantations seen

as vital to forest sustainability", Stabroek News, 26/10/00

************************************************************

 

OCEANIA

 

- Australia: Woodchipping old growth forests for "renewable energy"

 

In 1997 the Australian federal government issued a regulation for

Tasmanian forests, abolishing export woodchip quotas. Consequently

North Limited --the biggest woodchip exporter in the country--

announced plans to raise woodchip production from Tasmanian native

forests, that currently reaches around 3,4 million tonnes annually.

Tasmanian environmental NGOs expressed their concern that this

measure would open the gate for the destruction of old-growth

eucalyptus forests in the island, which constitute part of the

Australian National Heritage (see WRM Bulletin 7).

 

A new threat is now pending on Australian already scarce primary

forests: a government proposal included in the Renewable Energy Bill,

which promotes electricity generation by chipping old growth forests

--considered a "renewable energy source"-- with the aim of reducing

greenhouse gas emissions. 

 

The amendments proposed by other parties represented in Parliament to

use other sources of renewable energy --such as solar and wind--

instead of native forests were rejected by representatives of the

government and the main opposition party. The Australian Greens

severely criticised the initiative, and accused both parties to be in

the hands of woodchip companies and Senator Brown stated that the

initiative was the result of pressures from the woodchip companies,

which needed new outlets as they were facing stiff competition from

South American plantations for the Japanese paper market. This shows

how perverse the pulp and paper global market is: huge pulpwood

plantations in South America result in extensive environmental and

social impacts in that region, while at the same time they become the

indirect cause for the destruction of native forests in Australia.

And all this to feed the voracious Japanese paper industry.

 

Given the relatively small area occupied by forests in Australia such

initiative appears to have no reasonable justification. Additionally,

it is contradictory with Australia's position in the recently

celebrated COP6 at The Hague, where its delegates expressed their

stong support for the inclusion of forests in the so-called Clean

Development Mechanism to mitigate global warming. It doesn't seem to

make sense to us, but it certainly does for the chipping companies,

that will greatly profit from this "green" bill.

 

Article based on information from: Worldwide Forest/Biodiversity

Campaign News, "Australia Promotes Native Old-Growth Woodchipping as

Renewable Energy", 8/10/2000; e-mail: gbarry@forests.org

************************************************************

 

- Aotearoa/New Zealand: Logging company's dirty tricks revealed

 

The recent publication in the USA of a book, detailing a conspiracy

between government, industry, and various public relations firms to

discredit environmentalists in New Zealand, has produced surprise

among environmental and official circles in that country.

 

"Secrets and Lies: The anatomy of an anti-environmental PR campaign"

is the result of a research by journalists Nicky Hager and Bob

Burton, based on leaked internal documents from the state-owned

Timberlands logging company and its consultant in public relations,

the New Zealand subsidiary of the giant British-based firm Shandwick.

The book reveals that the main priority of the Timberlands public

relations campaign was to neutralise the discourse of the

environmental groups that threatened its logging plans. Timberlands

has been deliberately trying to discredit environmentalist groups

involved in the campaign by saying that they were small, extreme and

spreading misinformation --even though it knew very well that major

environmental groups, including some with a conservationist view,

were opposing its activities-- and by making legal threats to

discourage people from joining the protests.

 

Shandwick New Zealand, was paid by Timberlands to monitor all

opposing actions and media statements and devise ways to counter

them. Contractors were paid as well to remove graffiti and posters

from walls and lamp posts in the city of Wellington, which

constitutes a violation to freedom of speech. There are also proofs

that Timberlands tried to manipulate local communities in the West

Coast region, making them promises of improvement in infrastructure

and services, to get their support for its native forest logging

plans, and at the same time reviling "extremist" environmental

groups. For example it aimed to provide assistance to the West Coast

Principals Association in return for gaining the opportunity to get

the support of local schools for Timberlands and its operations.

 

Not only civil society was targeted by the manoeuvres of Timberlands.

The company has also been trying to reverse the direction of the

Labour Party policy, fearing that a change of government in November

1999 would have led to its native forest logging being stopped. In

fact the newly elected government --a coalition formed by the Labour

Party, the Alliance and the Greens-- forced Timberlands to withdraw

its plans to log extensive areas of beech rainforests on the west

coast of the country's south island (see WRM Bulletin 30). The

strategy of Timberlands to this regard also included providing supply

to its allies --among them some academics, the New Zealand Furniture

Association and other timber organisations-- for them to write

letters to the Labour leaders attacking conservationists and the

party's anti-native forest logging policies.

 

Article based on information from: "Secrets and lies: the anatomy of

an anti-environmental PR campaign" (

http://www.watertalk.org/reports/secrets_and_lies.html )

 

************************************************************

* GENERAL

************************************************************

 

- Concerns over the revision of the World Bank's Indigenous Peoples

policy

 

The World Bank's 1991 Indigenous Peoples Policy (Operational

Directive 4.20) forms one of ten so-called "safeguard policies" that

aim to ensure that Bank-funded operations do not cause adverse

environmental and social impacts in borrower countries. OD4.20 seeks

to ensure that Bank staff, borrower governments and implementing

agencies take positive action to safeguard indigenous rights by:

securing land tenure and resource access; mitigating negative

development impacts; guaranteeing participation; and assuring receipt

of benefits.

 

Since the mid-1990s, OD.420 and other safeguard policies including

the Forest Policy, have been undergoing a process of revision as part

of a Bank-wide "conversion" The Bank argues that simplifying and

streamlining its policies is necessary because clearer guidance will

improve the quality of compliance with safeguard provisions.

 

Consequently, the Bank circulated an "Approach Paper" on the revision

of OD4.20 to Indigenous Peoples  Organisations and NGOs in 1998. The

paper proposed that revision should concentrate on clarifying

definitions and procedures. In response, indigenous peoples and

indigenous rights advocates made clear to the Bank that any revised

policy must be stronger than the existing directive, particularly as

regards land rights and the right to self-determination. Civil

society organisations have also been urging the Bank to carry out a

thorough implementation review so that any policy revision takes into

account indigenous views and addresses the real difficulties the Bank

has had in implementing the policy on the ground. However, the Bank

resisted pressure to carry out a proper review. Meanwhile, the

revision process has been bogged down within the Bank for two years.

 

To demonstrate the need for a full implementation review, in May 2000

the Forest Peoples Programme and Bank Information Center (a major US-

based NGO that tracks the Bank) organised a workshop in Washington DC

on "Indigenous Peoples, Forests and the World Bank." The workshop

discussed eight case studies from Latin America, Africa and Asia

prepared by indigenous peoples about their own experiences of

different Bank-assisted operations affecting their communities and

territories. The primary goals of the workshop were to examine the

quality of the implementation of OD4.20 during the 1990s and

contribute to the current revision of the World Bank's policies on

Indigenous Peoples and on Forests.

 

The workshop found that compliance with OD4.20 is often weak and

sometimes highly unsatisfactory, especially with regard to the

critical needs for indigenous people's participation and secure land

rights. For example, there was not one case where indigenous peoples

felt they had participated in a meaningful way during the project

preparation phase. The workshop demonstrated how indigenous peoples

still often find themselves worse off after Bank projects due to

repeated patterns of poor compliance that include:

 

- No harmonisation of borrower policies with international standards

and Bank policies

- Baseline studies superficial or absent in project preparation

- Required legal reforms omitted

- Procedural oversights in appraisal

- Required capacity-building elements missing

- Indigenous peoples' land and resource rights not secured

- Required 'Indigenous Peoples Development Plan' omitted

- Inadequate benefit-sharing

- Ineffective supervision

- Disinclination to enforce loan agreements

 

Additional case studies undertaken by NGOs and presented at the

workshop revealed that where OD4.20 was implemented effectively in

Bank operations, this has been the result of long project preparation

times, intensive staff inputs, willingness to pay unusually high

'transaction costs', stronger borrower government commitments to

reform and genuinely participatory decision-making both in project

preparation and implementation.

 

The case studies also exposed the structural and financial obstacles

to effective implementation. It was noted that Bank staff lacks the

time, resources and incentives to adhere properly to safeguard

policies like OD4.20. A central conclusion of the workshop was that

clarifying policies alone will not improve implementation. It is

essential that the World Bank also undertakes major reforms to the

incentive structure and budget framework for its safeguard work. 

More effective compliance will also require:

 

- A revised Indigenous Peoples policy which adheres to international

law, follows the principle of prior and informed consent, recognises

and secures indigenous peoples' customary rights to lands and

resources, and provides mechanisms for the resolution of conflicts.

- Stronger enforcement mechanisms to back up conditions in loan

agreements

- Greater accountability of both the World Bank and borrower

governments to indigenous peoples, with agreements that are

enforceable in the national courts

- Independent monitoring and supervision, with agreed performance-

based indicators

- Clearer guidance to staff on the interpretation and application of

the policy

- Stronger mechanisms for participation and access to information in

appropriate languages

- Application of the policy to structural adjustment lending.

 

All indications are that the First Draft of the revised Indigenous

Peoples Policy (now to be called OP4.10) will be released publicly

early in 2001 when the Bank will launch a series of regional

consultation meetings to discuss the Draft with indigenous peoples

and civil society organisations. Based on the "conversion" of other

safeguard policies like the Involuntary Resettlement Policy,

indigenous groups and their supporters are worried that the revised

Indigenous Peoples policy might actually be weaker than OD4.20. The

fear is that the policy may be hot on some issues like participation

and benefit sharing, but sidestep tough issues linked to land rights

and self-determination. The concern is that the Bank will adopt a

more ambiguous "Panel proof" policy which will not provide indigenous

peoples with firm grounds for redress through the Inspection

Panel. We need to be vigilant to prevent this happening.

 

By: Tom Griffiths, Forest Peoples Programme, e-mail:

tom@fppwrm.gn.apc.org

 

(The full FPP-BIC workshop report is available from www.wrm.org.uy ,

www.bicusa.org or www.gn.apc.org/forestpeoples . Hard copies of the

summary workshop report, copies of individual indigenous case studies

and more detailed briefings on the revision of the Bank's Indigenous

Peoples and Forests policies can be obtained from the Forest Peoples

Programme at info@fppwrm.gn.apc.org )

************************************************************

 

- Films on forests and plantations receive award

 

Three films related to forest conservation and the problems caused by

pulpwood plantations received an award at the 17th International

Environmental Film Festival that took place from 18 to 22 October

2000 at the Friedrichsbau-Lichtspiele in Freiburg, Germany.

 

™komedia Award "Golden Lynx" for the Best Journalistic Achievement

was given to the film "The dirty business with white paper",  by the

German Inge Altemeier and Reinhard Hornung, which deals with

cellulose production in Indonesia. The diseases suffered by the

indigenous population, the misappropriation of land and the

destruction of the rainforests are documented. The film also traces

responsibility back as far as the headquarters of major German

companies and the very heart of government.

 

"Ancient yet modern: cork, a natural product" won the ™komedia Award

"Golden Lynx" for the Best Nature Film. Its author, the Swiss Vadim

Jendreyko, presents the example of the cork oak to show the use of a

renewable raw material in our everyday life. The film emphasises the

need to maintain the valuable cork-oak woods in southern Europe.

 

The conflict prompted by the arrival of a Malaysian logging company

to a village community on the Solomon Island is portrayed in "Since

the company", by the Australian Russell Hawkins, who won the

Promotional Prize of the City of Freiburg. The author brings key

conflicts out into the light --conflicts between those who want to go

on leading a traditional lifestyle and those prone to sell their

precious forests for money.

 

Article based on information from: ™komedia Institut  2000,

25/10/2000; e-mail: oekomedia@t-online.com.de (Those interested in

obtaining copies of these films can contact: ™komedia Institut,

Nussmannstrasse 14, D-79098 Freiburg, tel ++49-761-52024, fax ++49-

761-555724)

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS### 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is

distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior

interest in receiving forest conservation informational materials for

educational, personal and non-commercial use only.  Recipients should

seek permission from the source to reprint this PHOTOCOPY.  All

efforts are made to provide accurate, timely pieces, though ultimate

responsibility for verifying all information rests with the reader. 

For additional forest conservation news & information please see the

Forest Conservation Portal at URL= http://forests.org/ 

Networked by Forests.org, Inc., gbarry@forests.org