***********************************************

FOREST CONSERVATION NEWS TODAY

FSC Certifies Logging of Tiger Habitat in Indonesia

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Forests.org, Inc.

  http://forests.org/ -- Forest Conservation Portal

  http://forests.org/links/ -- Forest Conservation Links

 

07/30/01

OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY by Forests.org

Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification that timber is

environmentally acceptable is in danger of becoming meaningless.  FSC

has awarded a certificate to commercially log Indonesian rainforests

that are habitat for the Sumatran tiger, one of world's most rare

creatures with an estimated 300 remaining in the wild.  The logging

company "PT Diamond Raya" has not taken any specific measures to

protect the tigers, and has failed to carry out an environmental

impact assessment of its activities.  Yet it has achieved FSC's stamp

of approval.  Wood products carrying the FSC logo might not be as

'green' as they seem.

 

Indonesia's logging industry is so out of control - with pervasive

illegal logging, non-existent governmental controls, a scale of

logging that is clearly unsustainable, and widespread violations of

indigenous rights - that there should be no commercial logging of

remaining rainforests, certified or otherwise.  In March of this

year, a coalition of more than 140 Indonesian environmental and human

rights organizations called on FSC to suspend the certification of

logging operations in Indonesia, until such time as certifications

could be carried out reliably.  One of the key concerns is that the

Indonesian legal system does not presently respect indigenous forest

communities' traditional rights to the land on which they live,

whereas this is specifically required by the FSC.

 

Forests.org recently editorialized

(http://forests.org/recent/2001/fsccomme.htm) that FSC's principles

fail to define under what circumstances certified logging of old-

growth forest wildlands is acceptable, and do not incorporate large

protected areas to ensure sustainability of forest landscapes. 

Failure to come clean regarding the circumstances under which FSC

certification is appropriate in the World's remaining intact forest

wildernesses is not only disingenuous and dishonest to FSC's

important forest protection constituency, it also legitimizes

extensive first time commercial logging of remaining old-growth

forest wildlands.  Granting certification to log old-growth

Indonesian rainforests that are endangered tiger habitat illustrates

this point perfectly. 

 

It is time for all concerned forest conservationists to do battle for

the meaning and very soul of "forest certification" in relation to

claims of environmentally sensitive forest management.  The concept

of environmentally benign forest management is under threat from

meaningless industry sponsored alternative certification schemes. 

But just as troubling is that in its rush to be THE certification

label, FSC is severely weakening their commitment to environmentally

based forest management and forest conservation in general. 

 

FSC's message to concerned forest conservationists: drop dead.  FSC

is stonewalling any and all criticism.  FSC-USA is run like a

business - intent only upon the bottom line and getting out the cut -

rather than as a rigorous environmental certification organization

committed to global forest conservation goals.  WWF is so invested in

the success of FSC certification that they advocate for commercial

scale certified logging of the World's forest wildlands, rainforests

in particular.  In PNG, WWF is the driving force behind actual

logging of ancient rainforests where it may not otherwise occur -

including in delicate mangrove ecosystems.  And WWF is assisting

industrial loggers that have incredibly dubious environmental and

social records - the Malaysian logging cartels - to access and log

the World's dwindling rainforests by working with them to achieve FSC

certification. 

 

The FSC/WWF forest certification empire has so bastardized the

concept of environmentally benign forest management that now

Indonesian and Malaysian loggers accessing and logging much of the

World's remaining large rainforests - including endangered tiger

habitat - is being sold as "green" forest management.  Increasingly

forest conservations do not buy your vision, nor will we buy your

"green" products.

 

The tropical timber industry was on the point of collapse because of

campaigns to boycott tropical timber.  Returning again to an emphasis

upon not logging or buying any old-growth tropical timbers may be

more successful in meaningfully protecting the World's remaining

large old-growth rainforests than opening them up to questionable

"sustainable" forest management.  Forests.org desperately wants to

support FSC certification, but only if it is environmentally rigorous

and does not include logging old-growth forest wildlands.

 

Forests.org joins with the Rainforest Foundation and the Indonesian

NGO Walhi in demanding that FSC revoke PT Diamond Raya's certificate. 

Further, failure by FSC to quickly develop principles that leave most

old-growth forest wildlands unlogged will lead to widespread

withdrawal of support from ecologically rigorous forest conservation

NGOs that remain independent and vigilant. 

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

 

Title:  Environmentalists challenge 'eco-timber' go-ahead for logging

  in endangered tiger habitat

  Important test case for Forest Stewardship Council; consumers could

  be misled by 'green' scheme 

Source:  Rainforest Foundation and WALHI

Date:  July 11, 2001  

 

PRESS RELEASE

 

The habitat of one of the world's rarest creatures, the Sumatran

tiger, could be threatened by a rainforest logging company that has

recently been awarded an 'eco-timber' certificate under the Forest

Stewardship Council (FSC) scheme, warned environmentalists today. In

a letter to UK-based forest assessment company SGS-Qualifor, which

issued the certificate, the Rainforest Foundation and Indonesia's

largest national environmental organisations, WALHI, demanded that

the certificate should be immediately withdrawn (see attached).

 

The Indonesian logging company PT Diamond Raya is logging 224,000

acres (90,240 hectares) of rainforest on the island of Sumatra,

Indonesia, and was 'certified' by SGS-Qualifor in April 2001. To

qualify for the certificate, PT Diamond Raya is supposed to comply

with the standards set by the Forest Stewardship Council [1]. The

award of the certificate means that PT Diamond Raya's timber can

carry the Forest Stewardship Council's 'Seal of Approval', which is

intended to reassure members of the public that wood products are

from "environmentally acceptable and socially beneficial" sources.

The Forest Stewardship Council scheme is supported by the Worldwide

Fund for Nature (WWF) and other conservation organisations, major

high street retailers such as B&Q, and timber companies.

 

However, documentation in the possession of the Rainforest Foundation

shows that, whilst the forest being logged by PT Diamond Raya is

known to contain Sumatran tigers, of which there are only an

estimated 300 remaining in the wild worldwide, the logging company

has not taken any specific measures to protect them, and has failed

to carry out an environmental impact assessment of its activities

[2]. Destruction of forest habitat is cited by world conservation

authorities as one of the major threats to the Sumatran tiger.

 

'Undercover' investigations carried out in the area by independent

Indonesian researchers shortly after the certificate was issued also

revealed:

 

* widespread illegal logging taking place within the 'certified'

area [3];

* evidence of serious conflict between PT Diamond Raya and local

people, who have recently burned down one of the company's camps

in protest [4].

 

Simon Counsell, of the Rainforest Foundation, said:

"This case suggests that the FSC system of assessing logging

operations is not adequate to ensure that good forest management and

conservation is taking place. The FSC needs urgently to review the

procedures of forest assessors such as SGS-Qualifor, who are issuing

'eco-timber' certificates that may be misleading consumers. Wood-

buying members of the public should be aware that products carrying

the FSC logo might not be as 'green' as they seem."

 

Longgena Ginting of WALHI said:

 

"The Diamond Raya case is clearly an example from which FSC has to

learn. Seventy percent of logging in Indonesia is illegal, and we

desperately need a moratorium on logging, not dubious green awards

for logging companies who do not deserve them. There should be no

more certifications of any concessions in Indonesia before there have

been necessary reforms in the forestry laws that would create the

possibility for the Principles and Criteria of the FSC to actually be

implemented."

 

In March this year, a coalition of more than 140 Indonesian

environmental and human rights organisations called on the Forest

Stewardship Council to suspend the certification of logging

operations in Indonesia, until such time as certifications could be

carried out reliably. One of the key concerns is that the Indonesian

legal system does not presently respect indigenous forest

communities' traditional rights to the land on which they live,

whereas this is specifically required by the FSC.

 

ENDS

 

 

Notes to Editors

 

[1] The Forest Stewardship Council was set up in 1993 by

environmental groups and timber companies in order to provide a

globally recognised system of showing consumers which wood products

are from "environmentally acceptable, socially beneficial and

economically sustainable" sources. The FSC developed 10 'principles'

and 56 specific 'criteria' of good forest management, with which

logging companies are expected to comply in order to be granted the

FSC's 'Seal of Approval'. The FSC accredits private and independent

organisations such as SGS-Qualifor to carry out the actual

assessments of logging companies on its behalf.

 

[2] FSC assessment criterion no. 6.1 states that "Assessment of

environmental impacts shall be completed -- appropriate to the scale,

intensity of forest management and the uniqueness of the affected

resources -- and adequately integrated into management systems..."

 

Criterion no. 6.2 states that "Safeguards shall exist which protect

rare, threatened and endangered species and their habitats (e.g.,

nesting and feeding areas). Conservation zones and protection areas

shall be established, appropriate to the scale and intensity of

forest management and the uniqueness of the affected resources.."

 

[3] FSC assessment criterion no. 1.5 states that "Forest management

areas should be protected from illegal harvesting, settlement and

other unauthorized activities."

 

[4] FSC assessment criterion no. 2.3 states that "Appropriate

mechanisms shall be employed to resolve disputes over tenure claims

and use rights. The circumstances and status of any outstanding

disputes will be explicitly considered in the certification

evaluation. Disputes of substantial magnitude involving a significant

number of interests will normally disqualify an operation from being

certified"

 

For further information:

 

Simon Counsell, Director, Rainforest Foundation (London):  

                                         

Tel: 

+ 44 (0) 20 7251 6345 (office)     

+ 44 (0) 20 7354 1014 (home)

+ 44 (0) 7941 899 579 (mobile)

Fax:

+44 (0) 20 7251 4969

 

Longenna Ginting, Campaigns Director

e-mail: simonc@rainforestuk.com

 

WALHI (Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia / Indonesian Forum for

Environment, Jakarta*)       

Tel:

+ 62 21 794 16 79 (office)

+ 62 811 92 70 38 (mobile)

e-mail: kuleh@indo.net.id, walhi@walhi.or.id

+ 62 21 799 2826 (home)

Fax:  + 62 21 794 1673

 

* Please note time difference of +6 hours between London and

Djakarta.

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS### 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is

distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior

interest in receiving forest conservation informational materials for

educational, personal and non-commercial use only.  Recipients should

seek permission from the source to reprint this PHOTOCOPY.  All

efforts are made to provide accurate, timely pieces, though ultimate

responsibility for verifying all information rests with the reader. 

For additional forest conservation news & information please see the

Forest Conservation Portal at URL= http://forests.org/ 

Networked by Forests.org, Inc., gbarry@forests.org