***********************************************

FOREST CONSERVATION NEWS TODAY

Tragedy Hits Fragmented Monarch Butterfly Habitat

***********************************************

Forest Networking a Project of Forests.org, Inc.

  http://forests.org/ -- Forest Conservation Portal

  http://forests.org/web/ -- Discuss Forest Conservation

 

January 17, 2002

OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY by Forests.org

 

Last week a couple hundred million monarch butterflies died from an

apparent fluke of nature - as a rare ice storm hit their winter

habitat.  Some three quarters of the monarchs in the two biggest

colonies in Mexico were killed in the storm.  The catastrophe was

exacerbated by years of illegal logging; which, as with much of the

World, threatens Mexico's last natural forest habitats.

 

Monarch butterflies are one of the most marvelous creatures on the

Earth, both in terms of the sheer joy of watching a butterfly flutter

by, and their unique life characteristics which includes an annual

continental migration.  Their long term survival is very much in doubt

as their forest habitats in Mexico continue to be extensively logged

and otherwise impacted, and have been reduced to several relatively

small threatened fragments.  No less problematic is the continued loss

of their food source and pesticide overuse in the United States. 

 

This recent major loss of monarch butterflies is far from a chance

event.  In the last 30 years, nearly half the prime forest in the area

had been degraded or destroyed.  Their dwindling habitat virtually

guarantees that when an infrequent severe mortality event occurs, that

most or all of the population will be impacted. 

 

The human species is no different.  Our existence is intimately linked

to maintaining natural habitats and their species and ecological

processes that makes our lives possible.  Throughout our evolutionary

history, humans have been surrounded by a context of life-sustaining

ecosystems.  In most of the World, human society now, or soon will,

completely surround remaining small, diminished, unconnected

ecosystems.  Our alteration of habitats and ecosystems represents a

vast experiment.  At what point are ecosystems incapable of

maintaining air, water, soil and vegetation upon which our and every

animal species depends?

 

Global ecological sustainability depends upon ensuring that natural,

productive ecosystems remain the context within which human societies

operate.  Yes, I know of population pressures, economic inequity,

pervasive toxics, the political difficulties inherent in the bold but

necessary policies to pursue global ecological sustainability, and the

likelihood that we have already overshot the Planet's carrying

capacity.  Nonetheless, we know scientifically that without large

expanses of their natural habitat, species frequently die. 

 

Sustaining human populations requires strictly protecting and benignly

managing remaining wildlands; and ushering in the era of massive,

targeted, regional scale ecological restoration projects, and

restorative sustainable development in already altered habitats.

 

The human family is as utterly dependent upon our environment as the

monarch butterfly.  Habitat fragmentation and ecosystem collapse is an

equal opportunity killer.  If humans continue to view themselves as

above rather than co-dependent with ecology, we too are doomed to

become an endangered biological phenomenon.

g.b.

 

*******************************

RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

 

ITEM #1

Title:  Storm in Mexico Devastates Monarch Butterfly Colonies 

Source:  Copyright 2002 New York Times

Date:  February 12, 2002  

Byline:  CAROL KAESUK YOON

 

After a severe winter storm in mid-January, in the mountains of

central Mexico, dead monarch butterflies lay in piles on the ground,

in some places more than a foot high. Between 220 and 270 million

frozen butterflies had rained down from roosts where they normally

festooned towering trees, researchers estimated.

 

"It was really macabre," said Dr. Lincoln P. Brower, a butterfly

biologist. "I've been going down there for 25 years, and I've never

seen anything like it."

 

Most of the monarchs in the two biggest colonies in Mexico were killed

in the storm, in the largest known die-off ever of these butterflies,

according to a report by Dr. Brower and a team of researchers from

Mexico and the United States. But the loss of life is not expected to

threaten the species, they said.

 

In the report Dr. Brower, of Sweet Briar College in Sweet Briar,

Va., and his colleagues estimated that 74 percent of the monarchs at

the Sierra Chincua colony and 80 percent at the Rosario colony had

been killed. Along with a few smaller colonies, which scientists have

not surveyed, the butterflies in these major colonies make up the

entire breeding stock of monarchs for the eastern United States and

Canada.

 

The spectacle of the monarchs' long and rugged mass migration north

from Mexico each spring, a highly unusual behavior for an insect, has

made the species a favorite of nature lovers. The butterflies fly

north, stopping to lay eggs in the southern United States. The

monarchs that develop from those eggs continue the journey, and by

summer butterflies reach as far north as Canada.

 

The monarchs' epic migration is so exceptional that scientists have

called it an "endangered biological phenomenon." If the populations

that fly north each year from Mexico were to disappear, the mysteries

of that migration might never be solved.

 

While saying it was unlikely that a single event could ring the death

knell for the Mexican monarch populations, researchers said the

radically reduced numbers left the butterflies vulnerable to future

whims of weather, disease and continuing deforestation in and around

their winter resting grounds in Mexico.

 

Scientists noted that the species as a whole was not in danger because

other, smaller populations of monarchs that did not migrate to Mexico

could be found elsewhere, such as in the western United States.

 

Scientists will know in coming weeks how precarious the situation of

the devastated populations has become, as they get a better sense of

how many millions survived and what shape the butterflies are in as

they begin to move north.

 

"A bad winter followed by a bad spring could be catastrophic," said

Dr. Karen Oberhauser, a monarch ecologist at the University of

Minnesota.

 

Casual observers are unlikely to notice an obvious drop in monarch

numbers this spring, in part because of the natural variability in

population size from year to year.

 

The Rosario and Sierra Chincua colonies are thought to harbor perhaps

two-thirds of all the butterflies in Mexico's monarch sanctuaries,

which are in mountains in the state of Michoacán, west of Mexico City.

 

The results of the report, based on research in late January, were

released yesterday by World Wildlife Fund Mexico, which financed the

research along with Sweet Briar College and the Monarch Butterfly

Sanctuary Foundation.

 

Scientists who did not take part in the study expressed confidence in

the team of researchers and the data, which have not yet been

published in a scientific journal. Dr. Chip Taylor, an ecologist at

the University of Kansas, called the findings "clear and compelling."

 

According to the report, the storm on Jan. 12 and 13 dropped about

four inches of rain in the area and was followed by freezing

temperatures, a deadly combination as monarchs are known to be

particularly susceptible to freezing if they become wet. While noting

that records were spotty, Dr. Brower said temperatures following the

storm were the lowest recorded in the winter colonies in the last 25

years.

 

Because forest trees can act as an umbrella against the rain and a

blanket that can retain heat, scientists and conservationists have

been warning for years that the thinning of the forests in the

relatively small area they have chosen for their habitats could

threaten the butterflies by increasing their exposure to these

elements. And an earlier study showed that in the last 30 years,

nearly half the prime forest in the area had been degraded or

destroyed.

 

Dr. Brower said that he believed the loss of forests had contributed

to the die-off. But Dr. Taylor suggested the that storm was so severe

it might have taken its huge toll even with the cover of intact

forests.

 

Every year some of the millions of monarchs that spend the winter in

these high mountain forests die from predation, freezing or other

causes. Last year, hundreds of thousands of butterflies were found

dead in another colony, raising concern that they had been

intentionally killed with pesticides. But the butterflies were found

to be free of insecticides when tested in the laboratory, and

scientists soon reached a consensus instead that a severe cold snap

was the cause of death. Scientists still do not have precise estimates

of the typical numbers of monarchs that die in Mexico each winter, but

researchers agree it is considerably lower than the estimates of

mortality from the storm in January.

 

Scientists say monarch butterflies tend to gather in similar densities

in the colonies from year to year. As a result, the number of acres

covered by monarchs and counts of monarch- filled trees are thought to

provide reliable estimates of colony size. So researchers compared the

size of the area covered by monarchs and the numbers of trees, both

before and after the storm, to determine the reduction in colony

sizes.

 

"This is the lowest known number of butterflies at these sites over

the last 27 years," Dr. Taylor observed.

 

The team also took random samples throughout the two colonies to

estimate total numbers of dead monarchs in the forests. Dr. Brower

said he feared that the numbers, if anything, were an underestimate of

the actual death toll, as researchers only counted the butterflies on

the ground. He said he had just received word from researchers in

Mexico that the storm had left monarchs dead everywhere, including at

their roosts in the trees. "Some of these clusters hanging on the

trees are just all dead," he said. "It's terrible."

 

 

ITEM #2

Title:  Monarch Butterflies Dying in Mexico

Source:  Copyright 2002 Associated Press

Date:  February 13, 2002  

Byline:  MARK STEVENSON, Associated Press Writer

 

MEXICO CITY (AP) - A massive die-off of monarch butterflies in their

winter nesting grounds has deepened the mystery surrounding their

numbers, after researchers suggested a death toll twice as high as the

previous estimate of the entire population.

 

"This data is telling us we have to go back to square one" in

estimating just how many monarchs make the trip, said Lincoln Brower,

a zoologist who may be the foremost expert on the 3,000-mile migration

to Mexico. "We may be off by a factor of five to 10."

 

The monarchs' amazing migration has inspired thousands of

schoolchildren and amateur scientists in the United States, Canada and

Mexico. Although a single butterfly can spend its entire life in

either the United States or Mexico, its children and grandchildren

will know to migrate north or south.

 

Researchers are still trying to unravel the mystery, following the

lead of a motorcycle-riding American expatriate who stumbled on a

trail of dead butterflies to become the first outsider to discover the

nesting sites in January 1975.

 

Both the government and monarch expert Lincoln Brower agreed that an

unusual combination of freezing temperatures, rains, and clear night

skies in mid-January killed a high percentage of butterflies in their

winter nesting grounds in the central and western states of Mexico and

Michoacan.

 

A similar but less brutal cold snap this week is expected to kill more

of the creatures, who use a little-understood navigating system to

take the same route their ancestors took to Mexico from the United

States and Canada.

 

Brower estimated that 150 million to 250 million butterflies may have

frozen to death, the worst die-off on record - and twice the 110

million monarchs previously believed to have wintered here.

 

The manager of the government butterfly reserve, Roberto Solis,

estimated the total death toll from the two freezes at 30 million to

35 million, about one-quarter of those believed to arrive but still

well above the normal mortality rate of 10 to 15 percent.

 

Solis and Brower agreed that about 80 percent of butterflies died at

one of five officially recognized mountain sanctuaries and about 40

percent at another. Three other sites remained largely unaffected.

 

Both agree the monarch's survival as a species is not at risk.

 

For almost a century, scientists were puzzled by the butterflies'

winter route, which seemed to trail off in Texas.

 

Spurred by an article in a Mexico City newspaper, Kenneth Brugger and

his Mexican girlfriend combed the mountains of western Mexico - until

they finally spotted an orange-and-black cloud.

 

The monarchs winter in massive clusters that hang like Spanish moss

from the boughs of Michoacan fir forests, a habit Brower now thinks

may be a defensive strategy.

 

"The only butterflies that remained dry (in the freezing rain) were

the ones deep inside the clusters," Brower said. Describing the scene

at the mountains in January, Brower described reaching into piles of

dead monarchs a foot deep.

 

"Sticking my hand to gently pull out the beautiful delicate creatures

I've worked with for 25 years, there was an almost overwhelming

feeling of sadness," Brower said.

 

The issue is sensitive for Mexico, which has taken great pains in

recent years to try to protect fir forests shrunken by 40 percent by

illegal cutting.

 

Solis, the reserve manager, sticks by the lower death-toll estimate.

 

"The higher numbers must be an error, or bad faith," he said, adding

that many immobile, hibernating butterflies died when the tree

branches they were resting on fell because of high winds.

 

"This is a natural climate phenomenon, which has to be viewed as part

of nature's balance," Solis said.

 

Brower said deforestation may have made the die-off worse by reducing

temperature-regulating forest canopy. But Brower agrees that Mexico

has taken important steps to protect the forest, and agreed with Solis

that protection for the monarch should not be focused exclusively on

Mexico, nor on the reserves here.

 

"In the past, they were all over the place, they were probably better

distributed," said Brower. In the fall some monarchs can be seen

flitting around Mexico City.

 

Solis said that "the numbers that come here each year depends more on

what happens in their summer homes, in the United States and Canada."

Brower adds, "I think the big lesson is that in the United States ...

the real threat are the herbicides killing the milkweeds and other

plants the monarchs use for food."

 

 

ITEM #3

Title:  Logging Threatens Monarch Butterflies in Mexico

Source:  Copyright 2002 Reuters

Date:  February 15, 2002  

Byline:  Pav Jordan

 

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexico could do little to prevent a cold snap

that killed about 250 million Monarch butterflies last month, but

naturalists say the government can do something about an even greater

threat to their survival: illegal logging.

 

The red and black butterflies, which winter in Mexico each year after

a migration from Canada, died on Jan. 12 and 13 after they were soaked

by bitter rain and assailed by freezing cold.

 

"We can't do anything about these (natural) catastrophes," said Dr.

Ernesto Enkerlin, president of Mexico's National Commission for

Protected Natural Areas, a government body.

 

"But we can do something to ensure a better habitat so that butterfly

populations are better able to resist when these things occur."

 

The Monarchs need full, healthy and old forests to shield them from

moisture and cold nights. The trees hide them from the rain and help

keep in the warmth left by the sun during the day.

 

Since 1968, about 44 percent of the Monarch sanctuary woods region in

hilly Michoacan state has been depleted, mostly by rampant illegal

logging, the study said.

 

And the study by scientists at Mexico City's National Autonomous

University shows that the rate of depletion between 1986-99 was faster

than in the 1968-86 period.

 

"The situation is getting worse," said Dr. Lincoln Brower, considered

one of the world's foremost specialists in the annual Monarch

butterfly migrations from Canada to Mexico.

 

About 500 million of the butterflies arrived this year at the

Michoacan reserve, around Mexico's Day of the Dead celebrations in

November. For many in the region, the Monarchs represent the souls of

their departed loved ones.

 

The monarch butterfly is not considered an endangered species but if

the logging in Michoacan continues unabated, experts fear they may

abandon the reserve all together.

 

DEFORESTATION TAKES ITS TOLL

 

Weather claims butterfly victims in most years, although events like

the January cold front show the impact of deforestation on the

colorful insect species.

 

Last year, millions of butterflies in younger woods outside the

sanctuary perished in a cold snap that did not kill their brethren in

sturdier parts of the forest.

 

Illegal loggers continue to operate in the region, despite the risk of

being thrown in jail if caught and receiving economic incentives to

leave the trees alone.

 

The World Wildlife Fund in Mexico and the government have established

a $6 million fund to help people who live on the butterfly sanctuaries

and buffer zones to look to other industries to make a living.

 

Using only the interest on the fund, in 2000, the WWF began paying

owners of land used by the butterflies to halt logging. In June, the

group plans to pay $18 per 2.5 acres to landowners who agree not to

cut down their trees.

 

But Enkerlin and Brower say that's not enough to pay off would-be

loggers in the region.

 

"Only when the Monarch is worth more to them than the trees will they

stop," said Enkerlin.

 

The government is working to help people in buffer areas -- the forest

perimeter -- move into other industries like eco-tourism and crafts,

he added.

 

In a separate program, the government plans to plant trees over 24,700

acres of buffer area in the coming two years.

 

Scientists like Brower complement that initiative, even though the

consensus is that it will be many years before the forest acquires its

former density.

 

The question for many is whether it may be too late.

 

"The pressure is on and usually the environment loses when it's up

against the logging industry," Brower said.

 

###RELAYED TEXT ENDS### 

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is

distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior

interest in receiving forest conservation informational materials for

educational, personal and non-commercial use only.  Recipients should

seek permission from the source to reprint this PHOTOCOPY.  All

efforts are made to provide accurate, timely pieces, though ultimate

responsibility for verifying all information rests with the reader. 

For additional forest conservation news & information please see the

Forest Conservation Portal at URL= http://forests.org/ 

Networked by Forests.org, Inc., gbarry@forests.org