NEW EARTH RISING 2008: Please Support Ecological Internet in Our Fight to Defend the Earth

Ecological Internet's $70,000 Mid-Year Fund-Raiser. This is no time to let up on EI's successful information campaigns, knowledge tools & commentary for climate, rainforest and environmental sustainability action.

  12% - $8,440    63 donors.    $61,560 or 88% to go.    First $15,000 in gifts doubled, matched 100%!  Please Donate Now!
Ecological Internet (EI) provides for free the most successful Internet based environment portals and international Earth advocacy network ever, regularly achieving environmental conservation victories around the world. Your tax-deductible donation to EI will support one of the leanest most effective environmental advocacy efforts in existence.   Thank you, Dr. Glen Barry, President, Ecological Internet  | Dismiss This Message

Forest Conservation Blog Archive

« March 2005 | Main | May 2005 »

April 27, 2005

Ecosystems Need Top Predators

Top predators (other than humans) are absolutely essential for the maintenance of ecosystems - be they terrestrial, aquatic or marine. When predators are absent - which is nearly always the case in the human dominated world - plant and smaller animal communities spiral out of control. Such chaotic plant and animal communities lead to unstable ecoystem composition, and is not sustainable. We must learn to live with all of Earth's species. And if we lose an occasional cow or even human life because of it, this is the cost of global ecological sustainability.

Without Top Predators, Ecosystems Turn Topsy-Turvy

...a classic cautionary tale of the dangers of removing top predators from an ecosystem. "Taking out predators has a cascade of effects on other populations, down to the plant life," said John Terborgh, a professor of environmental science at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.

April 22, 2005

Pygmies Emerge from Forests to Demand Equal Rights

Abuses against indigenous peoples by the dominant money-grubbing, Christ driven culture continue apace. Too often we place such issues in the past, when in fact the rape and pillage of traditional peoples and their lands continues towards an apocalyptic finale.

Pygmies emerge from forests to demand equal rights

About 2 500 pygmies emerged from their forest homes in northeast Democratic Republic of Congo on Thursday to demand equal rights in the vast Central African nation, the United Nations radio station in the country said. The pygmies, many of whom reportedly made their first trips outside their villages in the trek to the town of Isiro for the demonstration, decried killings and abuses committed against them by other ethnic groups, it said. "We also exist, the pygmies," "Justice, equality and rights for the pygmies in the DRC," and "Pygmy killers must be brought to justice like any other guilty person," read signs carried by demonstrators, Okapi radio reported.

April 21, 2005

VICTORY: Huge Brazilian Indian Reserve Established in Disputed Amazon Rainforest

President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil has ratified the Raposa Serra do Sol Indian Reserve, with a belated stroke of the pen granting protection to some 6,370 square-miles (16,498 square-kilometers) of Amazonian rainforest in Brazil's northern state of Roraima. After more than thirty years of struggle, the traditional land of 15,000 Macuxi, Patamona, Ingarico, Wapichana and Taurepang people has finally been officially and fully recognized as theirs.

Efforts to establish the Raposa Serra do Sol Indian Reserve have been one of the main struggles of the indigenous movement of Brazil for years. Violence and murder have marred this important justice and sustainability campaign, as ranchers and other economic interests have resisted the policy of recognizing and demarcating indigenous lands.

For over a decade Forests.org has been following and supporting this struggle, networking information on behalf of the campaign and helping to generate protest emails and letters. Grassroots efforts in Brazil coordinated by the Indigenous Council of Roraima (CIR) led the way, but international solidarity by the Rainforest Foundation - US, and to a lesser extent Forests.org and others, has certainly played its part.

Local indigenous communities are rejoicing at their victory. However, the situation remains tense as local politicians and rice growers continue to resist establishment of the reserve, with the local governor declaring a seven-day period of mourning! The threat of violence is very real.

Forests.org, working with Rainforest Foundation - US, will continue to monitor the situation in Roraima, letting the massive Forests.org worldwide network know of any new developments. But for now you are encouraged to celebrate this wonderful victory. Yet again global Internet based information and action networks have played a role in a major local human rights and environmental sustainability campaign victory.

The rainforest conservation movement of which YOU are a part is on a roll!
g.b.


More information from Rainforest Foundation - US:

Title: Raposa Serra do Sol, Brazil: President Lula da Silva Finally Puts Pen to Paper!
Source: Rainforest Foundation US - press release
Date: April 20, 2005

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 20, 2005

CONTACT:
Isabela Figueroa, Rainforest Foundation US
Tel: (212) 431 9098
Email: ifigueroa@rffny.org

On April 15th, President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva finally announced the much anticipated demarcation of Raposa Serra do Sol (RSS) in Roraima state in northern Brazil. His ratification of "Portaria 534" ends a struggle of over thirty years to officially recognize the 4,317,984 acres of traditional land of the 15,000 Macuxi, Ingarikó, Patamona, Wapichana and Taurepang people who call RSS home.

For over 30 years, RSS has been under constant threat from the aggressive expansion of ranching and other economic interests. The lack of government recognition of this area generated serious conflicts, resulting in violations of the rights of Roraima's indigenous peoples, the most recent being the razing of four indigenous villages, the shooting of one resident and the disappearance of another in November 2004.

The process of RSS demarcation

In 1998, then Brazilian Minister of Justice Renan Calheiros signed RSS into law with "Portaria 820." All that remained for full recognition was the President's signature, trough ratification's presidential decree. Meanwhile, several legal challenges were mounted against the "Portaria 820" by local landowners and state politicians, preventing Lula's ratification.

During the course of Lula's administration, the government announced ratification of the area three times, but the government stepped back each time due to pressure from the political class in Roraima. On April 13, a new "Portaria" was issued, demarcating RSS as 4,317,984 continuous acres. After that the Brazilian Supreme Court extinguished all judicial actions against the forming "Portaria", arguing they lost their legal subject. Then, on April 15, Lula signed a Decree ratifying the new "Portaria" and finally ending the process of demarcation.

Lula da Silva's government excluded from the indigenous land the urban area of the Uirmanută village; state and federal roads that cross the area; and stated that "Monte Roraima" National Park must be co-managed by the federal government and the Ingarikó People.

According to the Indigenous Council of Roraima, Conselho Indígena de Roraima (CIR), there are still a few pending issues with the demarcation. However "the most important thing is that RSS was recognized as a continuous area, and not broken into islands," declared Marinaldo Trajano, CIR's General Coordinator.

"The communities are very happy, but the politicians here are really angry. We hope we don't experience a violent scenario." Joenia Wapichana, CIR's lawyer, stated that ""IR will observe the implementation of necessary measures to make the demarcation effective and ensure that the interest of indigenous people inside and outside the demarcated area are protected."

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

In 2004, CIR and RF-US took the struggle to another level by co-filing a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) regarding demarcation of RSS. On December 6, 2004, the IACHR issued precautionary measures to the Brazilian government asking that it take appropriate steps to protect the life and integrity of community members, and to ensure that they can live and freely move about their land without fear of threat.

"Raposa Serra do Sol's demarcation was, no doubt, a great victory, but Brazil's government has to implement effective measures to avoid violence against the indigenous peoples," explains Isabela Figueroa, RF-US' Program Director for Legal Initiatives. "In the past, Roraima's political class and the rice farmers reacted aggressively, justifying last December's precautionary measures that OAS required Brazil to implement. The governor of Roraima already declared that the state is ?mourning' because of Raposa's demarcation. The Federal government must act in the face of these threats."

A Victory for Amazon Peoples

The demarcation of RSS has been one of the main priorities of the Brazilian indigenous movement for many years. The international community has responded to repeated calls for support by writing letters, signing petitions, and even sending the President pens. While there are still challenges ahead in both the anti-indigenous atmosphere of Roraima and on the national level in Brazil, the ratification of RSS is a tremendous victory.

Since 1999, the Rainforest Foundation US (RF-US) has worked in close partnership with the Indigenous Council of Roraima, Conselho Indígena de Roraima (CIR) -- the most important indigenous organization in the state, representing its 40,000 indigenous people. Over the course of the past five years, RF-US has provided financial, legal, and technical support to the organization, whose main priority has been the demarcation of Raposa Serra do Sol. CIR has coordinated extensive efforts on the ground to have the area recognized, including grassroots organizing, legal work, and lobbying in Brasilia. RF-US has been their main partner in the US for international campaigns and advocacy. In addition, RF-US has supported the ground-breaking work of CIR's legal department, run by Joęnia Carvalho Wapichana, Brazil's first female indigenous lawyer and recipient of the 2004 Reebok Human Rights Award.

The Rainforest Foundation US is dedicated to preserving the rights of indigenous and traditional peoples of the rainforest. It achieves this goal by creating and supporting projects in collaboration with partner organizations and grassroots groups. At the request of these groups, our work in recent years has focused on land tenure issues with an emphasis on legal and policy initiatives.

April 18, 2005

UPDATE: World Bank Policies Harm Forests

The World Bank is seemingly unable to put its house in order regarding ensuring its funding does not damage forest and water ecosystems necessary for both ecological and economic sustainability. A new report - entitled "Broken Promises" - says that the Bank has failed to implement its own Forest "Safeguard" Policy, adopted in 2002, and that not one of the conditions the Bank promised to fulfill has been met. Across the World ? from Cambodia to India, from Brazil to the Democratic Republic of Congo ? the World Bank continues funding projects that are destroying tropical forests.

Over the past several years Forests.org has been instrumental in highlighting the threat posed to the World?s remaining ancient forests by the Bank?s then proposed, and subsequently adopted, change in lending criteria - which once again allowed funding of industrial forestry in ancient rainforests. Just as predicted, World Bank forestry programs meant to "promote sustainable development" are threatening rainforests and harming their inhabitants. A new report detailed below found that "The World Bank has reverted to the bad old ways of the 1980s when forest destruction and the trampling of local communities was considered the price of development".

The World Bank remains a dangerous organization that threatens global ecological sustainability like no other. This is simply unacceptable, and must not be left unanswered. Having once worked as a consultant in the belly of the beast, I have come to the conclusion that the Bank is probably irredeemable and may need to be smashed and dismantled.


A press release from the coalition that released the report:

Title: World Bank is contributing to destruction of world?s forests
Source: The Rainforest Foundation, Global Witness, CDM Watch, Down to Earth, Sinkswatch, Forest Peoples Programme, Environmental Defense, World Rainforest Movement
Date: April 11, 2005

A new independent report published today finds that programmes funded by the World Bank Group are causing destruction of the world?s remaining forests and harming poor people dependent on forests for their survival. The report - entitled "Broken Promises" [1] - says that the Bank has failed to implement its own Forest "Safeguard" Policy, adopted in 2002, and that not one of the conditions the Bank promised to fulfil has been met [2].

The report finds that:

§ The World Bank's private sector and insurance arms known as the International Finance Corporation (IFC), and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) have not adopted the new Forest Policy;

§ The IFC has pushed ahead a raft of dubious projects, all of which threaten forests and forest peoples, notably in the Brazilian Amazon and Indonesia;

§ There are no mechanisms to address forests and forest peoples under programmatic loans, such as "Structural Adjustment Credits";

§ There is a serious lack of transparency in the Bank's External Advisory Group which is meant to provide independent advice on the application of the Bank's Forest Policy;

§ So-called "Community Forest Management" projects in India, meant to alleviate poverty, have ignored World Bank safeguard policies and trampled the rights of indigenous peoples;

§ Policy changes to promote industrial logging in the Congo Basin have been pushed through with the assistance of the World Bank without required public consultation and without measures to secure local community rights;

§ High profile initiatives in Cambodia to stamp out forestry corruption have floundered for lack of Bank commitment;

§ Projects to promote carbon markets have despoiled landscapes and ruined livelihoods;

§ Conservation projects funded through the Global Environment Facility and implemented by the World Bank have imperiled traditional livelihoods and marginalised communities.

"In spite of all its past promises, the World Bank continues to be a major actor in the destruction of forests, and is pushing forest peoples into dispossession and poverty", said Ricardo Carrere from the World Rainforest Movement. "The Bank has blatantly breached its own policies regarding forest conservation and forest peoples' rights".

Broken Promises also exposes how the Bank's involvement in forestry violates its stated mission to "fight poverty" and promote sustainable development.

Simon Counsell, Director of the Rainforest Foundation UK said "The Bank appears to have learned nothing from its disastrous forays into the forests of countries such as Cameroon and Gabon, and is now on course to facilitate the destruction of the world's second largest rainforest, that of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Bank's plans for DRC?s forests are likely to damage or destroy the livelihoods of tens of millions of the world's poorest people, trample on the rights of indigenous forest people, and promote conflict and corruption along the way. The Bank?s management must closely investigate how its staff could have made such appalling mistakes".

ends

Notes:

[1] "Broken Promises: How World Bank Group policies and practice fail to protect forests and forest peoples' rights" will be issued in Washington, DC, on the 14th of April 2005, and will be available thereafter on the websites listed below. Advance copies are available to bona fide journalists.

[2] In 2002, the World Bank?s new "Forests Strategy" and Operational Policy on Forests were adopted, under a volley of criticism from civil society and indigenous peoples, who found that their key demands were far from met. In response to this criticism, the Bank's Board of Directors only approved the controversial new Forests Policy with a number of conditions to be met by the Bank.

For more information, please contact

Jon Buckrell
Global Witness
jbuckrell@globalwitness.org
+44 (0) 207 272 6731
www.globalwitness.org

Ricardo Carrere
World Rainforest Movement
rcarrere@wrm.org.uy
+598 2 413 2989
www.wrm.org.uy

Marcus Colchester
Forest Peoples Programme
marcus@forestpeoples.org
+44 (0) 1608 652 893
www.forestpeoples.org

Simon Counsell
Rainforest Foundation-UK
simonc@rainforestuk.com
+44 (0) 207 251 6345
www.rainforestfoundationuk.org

Liz Chidley
Down to Earth
dtecampaign@gn.apc.org
www.dte.org

Korinna Horta
Environmental Defense
khorta@environmentaldefense.org
+1 201 387 3500
www.environmentaldefense.org

Jutta Kill
Sinkswatch
jutta@fern.org
+44 (0) 1608 652 895
www.sinkswatch.org

Ben Pearson
CDMWatch
cdmwatch@ozemail.com.au
www.cdmwatch.org

April 16, 2005

VICTORY: Chile Drops Reservation to CITES Trade Ban on Endangered Trees

The rainforest movement and Forests.org have registered another major victory, as the government of Chile has decided to safeguard from logging the endangered and ecologically special alerce tree - withdrawing reservations for CITES Appendix 1 listing. The alerce, Fitzroya cupressoides, is unique to the coastal temperate rainforests of southern Chile and the mountains of western Argentina - only 15 percent of the habitat remains. The slow growing species can live for thousands of years, and the trees are a national monument in Chile. Local Chilean activists tirelessly exposed major illegal logging of this species, and asked their government for additional protections for the species.

In September of 2004, Forests.org's network (including YOU) requested that the Chilean government immediately end the extraction and commercialization of the ALERCE. ( http://forests.org/action/zold/chile/ ). And this is what has been achieved. It is very much hoped that the government's withdrawal of reservations for CITES Appendix 1 listing for the alerce is a first step in major protections for Chile's Valdivian rainforest - the alerce's primary remaining habitat. The Valdivian rainforest is one of only five remaining temperate rainforests in the world and the only one in South America.

According to local activists, Forests.org's massive email protest network was substantially responsible for successfully stopping a road through the Valdivian rainforest a few years ago. This current victory again demonstrates that Forests.org's network is alive, well and growing in effectiveness - despite having enlarged our focus as Ecological Internet (EI) to other ecological sustainability issues. As a project of EI, Forests.org remains well connected with local forest conservation movements throughout the world, and together the world's largest little forest conservation network is being heeded by government's worldwide.

The era when ancient forests and their species are devastated with impunity is drawing to an end. Thank you for your participation - onward and forward to global forest conservation and ecological restoration!
g.b.

April 10, 2005

Most Biodiverse Rainforests Threatened by Aerial Spraying

There are valid reasons to be concerned about the drug trade and the ravages of drug addiction. But this does not justify spraying toxic chemicals upon some of the most biodiverse rainforests habitats on the Planet found in Colombia, that are tens of millions of years old. Who can forget the suffering caused by similar spraying of Agent Orange? Certainly not the maimed and poisoned victims. It is not fair nor just that America's drug habit leads to widespread destruction of rainforest habitats necessary for global ecological sustainability and local livelihoods. If drugs are to be fought, there must be another way short of imposing chemical laden ecocide upon a region of evolutionary and ecological brilliance.

April 9, 2005

Poachers Empty Indian Wildlife Park of Tigers

Protected areas are too small and unconnected in most of the World to provide long-term permanent protection for their species - particulary wide ranging predators (other than humans). Protected areas must be expanded from 10% to 50% of most land masses to maintain viable populations of all species and ecosystem services that make all life possible. Anything less is museum-like and prone to episodes such as poaching of an entire species' population - as happened below to Indian tigers in one particular park.

Poachers empty Indian wildlife park of tigers

One of India's most prestigious national parks has been emptied of tigers by poachers, prompting international wildlife conservation experts to order an emergency census of the country's tiger population. All 18 tigers in the Sariska Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan were taken between July and December last year. The scandal has led to allegations of government corruption and negligence over the tigers' protection.

April 6, 2005

Dawning of the Age of Restoration

Clearly the Earth has lost too much of its terrestrial, aquatic and marine ecosystems to sustain all life including humankind in the long-term. And if there is money to be made in there restoration, all the better. Movement towards regenerating ecosytems as a business must be commended with some small caveats. It will always be more cost and ecologically effective to preserve important intact ecosystems in the first place. While restoration can reconstruct much of the structure, function, dynamics and composition of a native ecosystem; it does not get it all. Valuable genetic strains are lost and often communities are not complete. Nonetheless, the growth of the ecological restoration industry is very exciting, a cause to which Ecological Internet is devoted. Could this be the dawning of the Age of Ecological Restoration?

Eco-firms see growing profits

Just a niche market in the 1980s, ecosystem restoration has surged in the past five years, with announced multi-year projects exceeding $70 billion worldwide and annual revenues in the US of more than $1 billion a year, industry sources say.