This Action Alert has expired and can no longer be sent. Many thanks to those who participated.

Action Alert: Call on U.S. Government to Halt Ecologically Misguided Support for Large Scale Biofuel

Fuel from food and already overstressed terrestrial ecosystems is immoral and unsustainable. The Obama administration must start by rejecting the proposal to increase the corn ethanol fuel blend limit from 10-15%.

By Rainforest Rescue (Rettet den Regenwald) - March 23, 2009

In partnership with Ecological Internet

Share on Facebook

1.) Inform Yourself

  QUICK JUMP: ENTER INFO (2) | SEND (3)


NOTE: This is a protest, not a petition, sending emails to many real decision makers on matters vital to the Earth.

Biofuel from food and already stressed ecosystems is immoral and unsustainable
Caption: Biofuel from food and already stressed ecosystems is immoral and unsustainable (link)

Update April 2nd, 2009

This alert has already led to partial success, as the decision on whether to increase the corn ethanol blend from 10% to 15% has been delayed for a year. It is highly likely this protest was instrumental in delaying what had appeared to be certain approval for the proposal. Let's use this reprieve to continue organizing to resist agrofuels at the expense of food, people, ecosystems and climate.


Please support US environmental and social justice groups calling upon the new Obama administration to halt financial and policy support for large scale biofuel production. In particular, the Obama government's potential support for agrofuel expansion -- making of transportation fuels from food -- runs counter to their aim to urgently address climate change and threatens to cause more deforestation, hunger, human rights abuses, and degradation of soil and water.

The Obama administration promised to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to support renewable energy. Unfortunately, a large part of their solution involves further boosting agrofuel production, both in the US and abroad. The new administration must heed the overwhelming evidence that agrofuels worsen climate change through further deforestation and the destruction of other ecosystems; drive food prices up, forcing more and more people worldwide into hunger and malnutrition; and decimates biodiversity and ecosystems.

Corn-based ethanol fuel is ranked at the bottom of alternative energy sources "with respect to climate, air pollution, land use, wildlife damage and chemical waste." And it is morally abhorrent that in a hungry, impoverished world, it diverts food from people to cars. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack is aggressively seeking to increase the amount of ethanol in gasoline from 10 to 15 percent. Corn ethanol receives billions in subsidies despite conclusive science indicating its inefficient production provides little or no additional energy other than what is used for its production, and its ecological destructiveness in terms of land, water and climate.

So called "next generation" advanced fuels from non-food plants and plant parts, including forest biomass, will not resolve these problems. All industrially produced biofuel crops, edible or not, still require land, soil, water, fertilizer and other finite inputs. Biofuels based upon further expansion of unsustainable, industrial agriculture policies will intensify deforestation, toxic pollution and dependence upon fossil fuel based fertilizers worldwide. It is clear that industrial biofuels are not "renewable energy" given that soils, water, land and fertilizers are all in limited supply.

This is the first instance of the Obama administration violating their pledge to base policy upon science. Obama and farm-belt Democrats are serving the political agendas of agribusiness, rather than honouring commitments to address climate change and bring science based change to Washington. Science based biofuel policy will be further weakened if the Renewable Fuel Standard grants waivers to emissions from indirect land use change. If Obama's "New Green Economy" runs on agrofuels it will further lead to a dangerous "Ecological Bubble" of unrealistic promises from unsustainable industries.

Rainforest Rescue and Ecological Internet are concerned with America's growing ethanol industry, and the implications it has in setting a precedent for massive agricultural industrialisation of the world's remaining rainforests and other natural wildlands. We concur with the growing ecological consensus that large-scale industrial production of transport fuels and other energy from plants such as corn, sugar cane, oil palm, soya, trees, grasses, or so-called agricultural and woodland waste; threatens forests, biodiversity, food sovereignty, community-based land rights and will worsen climate change.

Environmental and social justice groups in the US have written an Open Letter to Barack Obama and his government, calling for policy makers to repeal rather than expand US biofuel targets. Instead of supporting biofuel industries, they propose alternative policies such as investing in genuinely clean decentralised wind and solar energy, dramatically reducing consumption, and protecting forests, biodiversity and the rights of indigenous peoples as just and effective solutions to climate change.

This email alert supports the call made by those groups and also calls on the US government to drop pursuit of further agrofuel expansion in collaboration with Brazil and throughout Latin America as envisioned by a “Western Hemisphere Energy Pact” and an “Energy Partnership of the Americas”.  Social movements and organisations throughout Latin America, including MST and Via Campesina in Brazil, have condemned the export-oriented sugar-cane ethanol model for their impacts on Brazilian land reform and agriculture.

Indeed, US agrofuel policies are already a major cause of Amazon deforestation, as US farmers switching from soya to corn is boosting soya expansion in Brazil and other South American countries. And increasingly the scourge of oil palm is poised to decimate the Amazon as well. In spite of these impacts, Obama, in a recent visit with Presiduent Lula provided assurances that cooperation to expand ethanol markets would be forthcoming.

Please respectfully request that expansion of biofuel industries be halted, policies and incentives driving this expansion be eliminated, beginning immediately with rejection of the proposed increase of the ethanol blend.

  •   | Discuss Alert



Sample Email Sent


Please commit to eliminating agrofuels


Dear President Obama,

I am writing to you in support of US environmental and
social justice organisations calling for an end to US
government support for agrofuels. The Open Letter by US
groups can be found at:
www.globaljusticeecology.org/connections.php?ID=244

In particular, while noting the temporary delay, I ask you
to permanently reject the proposed ethanol blend increase
from 10-15% which will only further investment in
infrastructure supporting agrofuel expansion, and sets a
terrible global precedent of increasing biofuel production
from food, and at the expense of already stressed
terrestrial ecosystems. Further, I ask you to include
indirect land use change in assessments of greenhouse gas
emissions from agrofuel production so that a realistic
assessment of climate impacts is possible. Finally, halt
plans for engaging other countries, particularly Brazil, in
agreements to supply biofuels such as the proposed “Western
Hemisphere Energy Compact” and “Energy Partnership of the
Americas”.

As the Open Letter demonstrates, there is overwhelming
evidence that agrofuels accelerate climate change. They are
pushing the agricultural frontier further into forests and
other ecosystems, which are essential for regulating the
climate, and they are increasing fertiliser use and thus
nitrous oxide emissions. This and numerous other adverse
ecological impacts from industrial biofuels, including
questioning whether corn ethanol production even results in
a net energy benefit, have been confirmed by a series of
scientific studies. Soya has been shown to be the main
driver of Amazon deforestation and the US government
support for corn ethanol has triggered large-scale soya
expansion across South America as US farmers are switching
from soya to corn. This is one of the main reasons why the
Amazon deforestation rate sharply increased in 2007/08.
Indications are that oil palm, the scourge of Asian
rainforests, is becoming established in the Amazon as well.

Second-generation biofuels are likely to exacerbate, not
mitigate the situation. All industrially produced biofuel
crops, edible or not, still require land, soil, water,
fertilizer and other finite inputs. Industrial tree
plantations, including GE trees, are expected to become one
of the major sources for future cellulosic ethanol or
synthetic biodiesel. In South-east Asia, for example, both
palm oil and acacia plantations are the two main drivers
behind the destruction of rainforests and peatlands. The
carbon dioxide emissions linked to this destruction are so
high that they have turned Indonesia into the third biggest
contributor to greenhouse gas emissions worldwide.
Furthermore, one of the worst recent human rights abuses
against Indonesian communities has been the fire-bombing
and destruction of a village linked to a tree plantation
company which is part of the Sinar Mas group that also
invests in palm oil (tinyurl.com/bn6ptq).

Agrofuels have been amongst the main causes behind the rise
in global food prices. According to the UN Food and
Agriculture Organisation, more than one billion people are
now going hungry. Agrofuels are linked to the displacement
of indigenous peoples and small farmers, often involving
violent evictions and human rights abuses. In Brazil, for
example, a large number of social movements and NGOs have
rejected the sugar-cane ethanol model, which is linked to
degrading working conditions, the use of slave labour,
violent evictions, increasing hunger and poverty, and to
the pollution of soils, air and water and to biodiversity
losses (tinyurl.com/arc9wu and tinyurl.com/apr7vk).

There are many options for addressing climate change and
energy security which are far less damaging than agrofuels
and I hope you will turn your attention to these, including
massive improvements in energy efficiency and public
transport, support for truly clean energy from
decentralised wind and solar power, support for small scale
organic agricultural practices and local food production,
effective measures to protect biodiverse natural forests
and the rights of indigenous peoples. And overall, it is
essential that your climate and energy policies stress
reduced consumption, particularly of energy and forest
products.

Yours sincerely,


   Earth Action Network Protest Participants

    People from 73 countries have sent 25,800 protest emails

M Leino - Finland
M Kraatz - Australia
J Roach - United States
F Brondex - France
S Isokangas - Finland
J Amala - Australia
M.A.Kypta - Austria
C Spoors - United Kingdom
D Chapdelaine - United States
C Frazier - United States
D Gakeler - United States
A Regnicoli - Italy
V Barrett - New Zealand
S Carty - Australia
D McKelvey - United States
J Wiley - United States
D Miller - United States
M A M J Denison - United States
P J Pan - United States
A Falise - Belgium
E Horstman - Ecuador
M Blais - Canada
V Pascal - France
E Collins - United States
D Muni - India
           



** This alert requires JavaScript, and currently Firefox and Internet Explorer are the only tested browsers. Please let us know immediately if you are having difficulties sending the alert