This Action Alert has expired and can no longer be sent. Many thanks to those who participated.

Authentication:
Request Token: lBiE8BtR7w9jlhgEMzhzYfT4o2bxIvasi4h2AGcmYD8
Action Alert: Implore President Obama to End Climate Appeasement by Supporting a Carbon Tax

There exists near unanimous scientific consensus that abrupt climate change is occurring, that it is caused by burning fossil fuels and clearing natural ecosystems, and that observable and escalating impacts indicate it may be worse than worst case predictions, threatening the habitability of our one shared biosphere. Almost certainly there is no way to stop entirely the warming and climate weirding; it is already too far progressed. Yet our immediate actions in the short term to cut – or fail to cut – carbon and greenhouse gas emissions will determine its severity, whether it will eventually stabilize or become runaway, and whether it is survivable. The single policy action that could occur most quickly, and significantly reduce emissions, is to place a price upon emitting carbon through a tax. The funds raised from a carbon tax can replace other taxes, be returned to low-income earners, and be used for other laudable goals including paying down the deficit, developing low-emission energy systems, and protecting and restoring global ecosystems. Abrupt climate change will not be appeased, but it can be taxed, and thus reduced, through first a national and eventually a global carbon tax.

By Climate Ark, a project of EcoInternet - November 15, 2012

Share on Facebook | |



Additional Background

When first elected, President Obama had a long history of rhetorical commitment to address climate change, and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize at least partially on this basis. During his first term, as global climate and ecosystems noticeably worsened, the president's administration never exerted much political capital to reduce America's greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, concern over jobs and the economy led to plans to significantly expand fossil fuel production and consumption, solidifying a new generation of fossil fuel addiction and resulting climate disruption.

The Obama administration has continued America's obstruction of global climate negotiations by backing off from any firm commitments for equitable emission cuts. During the recent presidential election, many Americans were shocked by the candidates' silence on climate change policy, a willful abdication of leadership on abrupt climate change, which was revealed as criminally negligent by Hurricane Sandy's climate change enhanced wind, rain, and storm surge. Instead of the dramatic emissions cuts which must begin immediately to minimize abrupt climate change, yesterday reelected President Obama indicated he only wants a national conversation on the topic. This failure of leadership - doing nothing during a national ecological emergency, proposing a conversation when action is needed, policy concessions that are too little and too late and don't reduce emissions - can only be described as climate appeasement.

A carbon tax on the carbon content of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) would allow carbon emissions to be efficiently and equitably reduced. The prices of fossil fuels don’t reflect their true costs of production, transportation, and burning. A permanent and increasing U.S. carbon tax will reduce the emissions that are driving global warming and generate revenue to help close looming budget gaps, which provides a large and unique constituency for the wise policy. An initial carbon tax equating to 10 cents a gallon on gasoline, but applied to all U.S. fossil fuel burning, would bring in roughly $55 billion a year in revenue, and could continue to be similarly scaled-up. A carbon tax is the most economically efficient means to convey crucial price signals that spur carbon-reducing investment. Carbon taxes can be phased in so businesses and households have time to adapt, and can be structured to be revenue-neutral, and to soften the impacts of added costs by distributing tax revenues to households (“dividends”) or reducing other taxes (“tax-shifting”). Support for a carbon tax is growing steadily, while it is acknowledged that proposals for cap-and-trade with offsets cannot deliver the same needed emissions reductions as efficiently or quickly. Global ecological sustainability requires immediate and dramatic carbon emission cuts, and a carbon tax is the best way to start now.


(privacy)

I do not wish to receive occasional short notifications of new action alerts (~3 a month)

In addition to new action alerts, inform me of major forest and climate policy developments (~2/month), and provide original environmental analysis (~2/month) (more information)


Your message is going to recipients. You may receive out of office or other emailed replies from protest email recipients.

Review and Edit Message

Abrupt climate change won't be appeased, but it can be taxed
Abrupt climate change won't be appeased, but it can be taxed  (link)

Message Title - please edit title and personalize message below (no URLs)

Your Message:


YOUR NAME, EMAIL & COUNTRY ADDED AUTOMATICALLY

bcc: YOU



Discuss

" data-num-posts="4" data-width="470">
"

   Earth Action Network Protest Participants

    People from 83 countries have sent 216,424 protest emails

D Steele - United States
L M Elliott - United States
E S Hussey - United Kingdom
L C Jones - United States
L Michelsen - United States
A Dudgeon - United Kingdom
M Dyer - United States
A G Panetta - United States
Paulx - United States
S Bermannova - Czech Republic
A Brundu - Italy
S Smith - United Kingdom
V Escobar - United States
V Edward - Belgium
P Wallén - Sweden
L Kegler - United States
S Overton - United Kingdom
M Carvajal - Chile
H Kirk - United Kingdom
M Fossard - France
Y Schofield - Australia
D Beatty - United States
F J Trejo - México
R Peace - Canada
B Grand - United States
            

** This alert requires JavaScript. Please let us know immediately if you are having difficulties sending the alert