{"id":441,"date":"2010-03-05T18:57:07","date_gmt":"2010-03-05T23:57:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.goodforforests.com\/?p=441"},"modified":"2023-03-24T08:51:50","modified_gmt":"2023-03-24T12:51:50","slug":"opening-the-usgbcs-leed-standard-whats-missing-from-the-discussion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forests.org\/fr\/opening-the-usgbcs-leed-standard-whats-missing-from-the-discussion\/","title":{"rendered":"Opening the USGBC\u2019s LEED Standard \u2013 What\u2019s Missing From the Discussion"},"content":{"rendered":"

Opening the USGBC\u2019s LEED Standard \u2013 What\u2019s Missing From the Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n

An online magazine just posted a piece on the USGBC revision of the LEED standard and unfortunately, the reporter really gets lost in the woods.\u00a0\u00a0 I can\u2019t post a comment on their forum, so I\u2019ll use my own!<\/p>\n

The Emagazine.com piece starts out well, with stats on the tremendous growth of green building in the United States (2% of the construction market in 2005, projected to be 20% by 2013).\u00a0 Before you have a chance to reflect approvingly on that progress, they quickly shift to a focus on the \u201cheated fight\u201d and \u201clong-running rivalry\u201d between SFI and FSC and the \u201ccontroversial effort\u201d by the USGBC to open its system to other forest certification standards.<\/p>\n

SFI doesn\u2019t see FSC as a rival \u2013 when 90% of the world\u2019s forests are not certified at all, where is the value in rivalry?\u00a0 Less than 20% of the certified fiber in North America is FSC \u2013 the remaining 80% is certified to other standards that are recognized by governments and organizations around the world.\u00a0 SFI wants the USGBC to create fair science-based benchmarks that will open up the credit to ALL credible forest certification systems used in North America \u2013 a long running controversy just doesn\u2019t make sense.<\/p>\n

A quote at the end of the article, by a character not unknown to SFI, implies that opening the USGBC standard would doom FSC and \u201cthe future of many things green.\u201d\u00a0 What a load of nonsense. That quote really makes it sound like Mr. Goldman (who is FSC\u2019s lawyer and the author of the Forest Ethics and Sierra Club complaints mentioned in the article) is more concerned with the fate of FSC\u2019s monopoly over LEED green building points for the certified wood credit than encouraging responsible forestry.<\/p>\n

Besides the hyperbole about SFI and FSC and the impact of any changes, what\u2019s missing from this story is any balance (save for one quote about how maintaining the status quo with the standard will give an unfair advantage to wood from offshore sources).\u00a0 The reporter doesn\u2019t acknowledge the views of many others who are urging USGBC to accept all credible forest certification standards.\u00a0 That includes the National Association of State Foresters (NASF), a group of state forestry officials from all fifty states.<\/p>\n

NASF has called on green building programs to accept all credible forest certification programs, naming SFI, FSC and ATFS.\u00a0 These are the real experts \u2013 they are the state forestry officials who see firsthand how the standards work on the ground.\u00a0\u00a0 The group unanimously passed a resolution that said:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe ATFS, FSC, and SFI systems include the fundamental elements of credibility and make positive contributions to forest sustainability. . . . No certification program can credibly claim to be \u2018best\u2019, and no certification program that promotes itself as the only certification option can maintain credibility. Forest ecosystems are complex and a simplistic \u2018one size fits all\u2019 approach to certification cannot address all sustainability needs.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Governors of several states have also called for an opening of the LEED standard, including Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, who a few weeks ago wrote to USGBC:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe USGBC should fairly assess and include all credible forest certification programs, including SFI and ATFS systems\u2026I urge you to quickly make a board decision to recognize well-managed wood from Minnesota and all credible forest certification programs. In doing so, USGBC can join other government agencies and green building rating programs in recognizing wood as an environmentally friendly building material.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

USGBC needs to start listening to these important voices. Readers of the Emagazine article need a grain of salt.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>

SFI EN BREF<\/a><\/h4>\r\nSIGN UP<\/b><\/a> to receive our Monthly Newsletter.\r\n
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>