SFI – TAKING A FIRM STANCE AGAINST DEFORESTATION/FOREST DEGRADATION

SFI, along with others worldwide, shares the vision of ensuring forests remain as forests. The SFI Forest Management Standard does not allow deforestation and has strong requirements to prevent forest degradation. The SFI Fiber Sourcing and SFI Chain of Custody Standards also have requirements to ensure SFI-certified organizations avoid sourcing from controversial sources, which includes conversion sources originating from regions experiencing forest area decline.

While the SFI Forest Management Standard has strong requirements to prevent forest degradation, definitions on “deforestation” as well as “forest degradation” were added this spring to strengthen SFI’s position on these critical topics. Additional guidance was also adopted to link the new definitions to SFI standard requirements.

SFI 2022 Fiber Sourcing Standard With Supplemental Requirements to Support EUDR Compliance Module

SFI Standards Prevent Deforestation

The SFI Forest Management Performance Measure 1.3 specifies SFI’s commitment to no-deforestation, indicating that “Forest lands converted to other land uses shall not be certified to this SFI Standard.” These restrictions are intended to apply to the conversion of forest land and recently deforested land that is capable of regenerating to forest but is preventing from doing so. Furthermore, if a SFI certified organization plans to convert one forest cover type to another forest cover type, they must conduct an assessment of the potential ecological impacts to ensure it does not significantly impact Forests with Exceptional Conservation Values, old growth forest, and/or forest critical to threatened and endangered species.

The SFI Fiber Sourcing Standard and the SFI Chain of Custody Standard also require SFI-certified organizations to assess the risk of sourcing forest fiber from controversial sources including from conversion sources originating from regions experiencing forest area decline. If a SFI-certified organization determines they are sourcing from such sources, they will need to mitigate this risk of sourcing this forest fiber.

SFI Standards Prevent Forest Degradation

The SFI Forest Management Standard prevents forest degradation through five core areas which act to limit lasting and significant direct anthropogenic impacts to the structure, composition, or function of the forest. Below are those areas and the key requirements of the SFI Forest Management Standard.

1. PRODUCTIVITY (e.g., growing stock, non-timber forest products)

  • Prompt forest regeneration after harvest: Performance Measure (PM) 2.1.
  • Maintenance of forest soils and stocks: PM 2.3.

2. BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (e.g., ecosystem state, forest fragmentation, species, species functional groups)

  • Protection and maintenance of native biodiversity: PM 4.1.
  • Conservation of species at risk and rare communities: PM 4.2.
  • Identification and protection of ecologically important sites: PM 4.3.

3. DISTURBANCES (e.g., alien invasive species, fire, water quantity)

  • Protection of water values: PM 3.2.
  • Avoidance of negative effects of biological agents: PM 2.4.
  • Limitations of forest degradation from wildfire and restore forest post-wildfire: PM 10.1.

4. CARBON STORAGE

  • Enhancement of opportunities for carbon capture on forests that are owned or managed: PM 9.2.

5. PROTECTIVE FUNCTIONS (e.g., soil erosion, water quality)

  • Maintenance of forest soils and stocks: PM 2.3.
    Protection of water values: PM 3.2.

Furthermore, SFI Performance Measure 1.2 lays out specific constraints on conversion of one forest cover type to another forest cover type, which in turn also prevents forest degradation. In particular, PM 1.2 precludes conversion of one forest cover type to another forest cover type in the absence of objectives for long-term outcomes that support maintaining native forest cover types and ecological function. This includes where conversion puts rare; ecologically important, native forest cover types at risk of becoming rare, or where conversion creates significant adverse impacts on Forests with Exceptional Conservation Value, old growth forests, or forests critical to threatened and endangered species.

SFI Board Policy Cutoff Date

In March 2024, the SFI Board officially adopted a policy which reconfirms SFI’s commitment to no deforestation and no forest degradation by explicitly prohibiting certification to the SFI Forest Management Standard on lands that are deforested and on practices that are causing forest degradation after December 31, 2020. With these enhancements, SFI’s Forest Management Standard is well positioned to demonstrate compliance with any regulatory requirements focused on deforestation and forest degradation.

SFI Module with Supplemental Requirements to Support EUDR Compliance

With the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) accelerating these global conversations, it’s also important we develop tools specifically for those organizations looking to demonstrate compliance with EUDR. In March 2024, SFI introduced an optional module for companies certified to the SFI Fiber Sourcing and Chain of Custody Standards. This optional EUDR module applies to the manufacturing facilities and therefore can provide relevance directly in the supply chain for products going into the EU. Because this module was developed for EUDR compliance specifically, the module integrates EUDR definitions as well as EUDR’s due diligence system. SFI-certified organizations can add this module to the scope of their existing SFI Fiber Sourcing or Chain of Custody certification. While the optional EUDR module requires geolocation, SFI leaves it up to the organization to choose their preferred geolocation technology solution and provider.

Forests are essential to all life on earth, contributing to the maintenance of biodiversity, the sequestration of carbon and regulation of the earth’s climate, the production of oxygen worldwide, the purification of fresh water, the production of a wide range of forest products, and the provision of a variety of spiritual, aesthetic, and recreational values. Forests and the benefits they provide to the world are immeasurable.

Permanent loss of forest cover is a global concern that society has been struggling to prevent for many years, with government, industries and NGOs working in many countries to detect, prevent, and de-incentivize forest cover loss, and incentivize forest conservation, restoration, and protection. Several market-based initiatives have been developed to reduce deforestation, and foremost among them is forest certification.

In North America, deforestation reduction efforts have largely been effective, with U.S. forestland area stabilized since roughly 1910-19202, and deforestation in Canada is reported as being less than 1⁄2 of 1% over the last decade3, averaging 0.1 to 0.14%4.

Credible forest certification programs like SFI are an important element in achieving no-deforestation. The SFI 2022 Forest Management Performance Measure 1.3 specifies SFI’s commitment to no-deforestation, indicating that “Forest lands converted to other land uses shall not be certified to this SFI Standard.” These restrictions are intended to apply to the conversion of forest land and recently deforested land that is capable of regenerating to forest but is preventing from doing so.

Note that the definition of deforestation does not apply to activities needed to achieve sustainable forest management which includes forest lands used for forest and wildlife management such as wildlife food plots or infrastructure such as forest roads, log processing areas, trails etc. This is consistent with Performance Measure 1.3, Indicator #1 in the SFI 2022 Forest Management Standard.

The SFI 2022 Fiber Sourcing Standard and the SFI 2022 Chain of Custody Standard also require SFI-certified organizations to assess the risk of sourcing forest fiber from controversial sources including from conversion sources originating from regions experiencing forest area decline. If a SFI-certified organization determines they are sourcing from such sources, they will need to mitigate this risk of sourcing this forest fiber.

Recently, discussion points around forests have shifted from deforestation to the less well defined, “forest degradation.” Forest degradation is a much more nuanced concept than “forest cover loss” and requires a more detailed review and analysis.

While there are well over 100 published definitions of “forest degradation”5, the concept can be broadly defined when anthropogenic disturbance impacts a forest landscape to the point where it is unable to recover and deliver its expected range of ecosystem services.

Any list of ecosystem services provided by a forest would be lengthy but suffice it to say it would include the filtering and recharge of freshwater, flood control, carbon sequestration, oxygen production and air filtration, wood fiber production, biodiversity maintenance, provision of non-timber forest products, along with the provision of recreational, aesthetic, and spiritual values.

While metrics do not exist to readily measure all of these, there are indicators for many of them, and one must presume that the more of them that are maintained, the higher the likelihood of the others being maintained.

Further, many of these values are variable in space and time, and several are not coincidental in space; a regenerating fire scar or clear cut may have low aesthetic value for a few years but still have reasonably high carbon sequestration rates, especially after silvicultural treatment, and an old-growth stand may have low carbon sequestration, but high spiritual value. Further, the diversity of a young stand may be similar to an old stand, but have very different species composition, meaning that at a broader scale, both are required to maintain biodiversity. In short, many of these ecosystem values need to be considered over large spatial and temporal scales covering the entire life-cycle of the forested landscape.

Catastrophic large-scale disturbance such as fires, insect outbreaks and windthrow are not considered forest degradation, if the forest is restored, even though some may have root causes in anthropogenic climate change or past forest management decisions. Where these disturbances do occur, silvicultural activities such as salvage logging and regeneration activities can have a positive effect on forest health.

Some forest management activities may be considered to have lasting and direct positive anthropogenic effects. These may include positive impacts on biodiversity through restoration, assisted migration, or fire management, among others. Such activities would not be considered degradation, although they may differ from natural processes.

The SFI 2022 Forest Management Standard prevents forest degradation through five core areas which act to limit lasting and significant direct anthropogenic impacts to the structure, composition, or function of the forest.

>Below are those areas and the key requirements of the SFI 2022 Forest Management Standard.

  1. PRODUCTIVITY (e.g., growing stock, non-timber forest products)
  • Prompt forest regeneration after harvest: Performance Measure (PM) 2.1.
  • Maintenance of forest soils and stocks: PM 2.3.
  1. BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (e.g., ecosystem state, forest fragmentation, species, species functional groups)
  • Protection and maintenance of native biodiversity: PM 4.1.
  • Conservation of species at risk and rare communities: PM 4.2.
  • Identification and protection of ecologically important sites: PM 4.3.
  1. DISTURBANCES (e.g., alien invasive species, fire, water quantity)
  • Protection of water values: PM 3.2.
  • Avoidance of negative effects of biological agents: PM 2.4.
  • Limitations of forest degradation from wildfire and restore forest post-wildfire: PM 10.1.
  1. CARBON STORAGE
  • Enhancement of opportunities for carbon capture on forests that are owned or managed: PM 9.2.
  1. PROTECTIVE FUNCTIONS (e.g., soil erosion, water quality)
  • Maintenance of forest soils and stocks: PM 2.3.
  • Protection of water values: PM 3.2.

Furthermore, SFI Performance Measure 1.2 lays out specific constraints on conversion of one forest cover type to another forest cover type, which in turn also prevents forest degradation. In particular, PM 1.2 precludes conversion of one forest cover type to another forest cover type in the absence of objectives for long-term outcomes that support maintaining native forest cover types and ecological function. This includes where conversion puts rare; ecologically important, native forest cover types at risk of becoming rare, or where conversion creates significant adverse impacts on Forests with Exceptional Conservation Value, old growth forests, or forests critical to threatened and endangered species.

Since 2015 the SFI Forest Management Standard prohibits deforestation and forest degradation through multiple requirements in the Standard.

The SFI Board reconfirmed its commitment to no deforestation and no forest degradation on March 20, 2024, by explicitly prohibiting certification to the SFI 2022 Forest Management Standard on lands that are deforested and on practices that are causing forest degradation after December 31, 2020.

In the spirit of rehabilitating degraded lands and/or non-forest lands to sustainably managed forests, certification to the SFI 2022 Forest Management Standard is allowed, as long as the current SFI certified organization did not cause the deforestation, and is rehabilitating the lands, and is meeting the requirements of the SFI 2022 Forest Management Standard.

The conversion of forest land to non-forest land use.
 New forest certification standards offer nature-based solutions to the climate crisis

FEATURED ARTICLE

NEW FOREST CERTIFICATION STANDARDS OFFERS NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS
The Sustainable Forestry Initiative’s (SFI) updated forest certification standards provide solutions to some of the world’s most pressing sustainability challenges. Sustainable forest management and the procurement of wood products from sustainably managed sources are critical tools that help avoid deforestation.